Skip to content
teamed.

EOR comparisons

Teamed vs the field.

Side-by-side comparisons that show the math, the model, and the moments competitors don’t cover. Pick a type below to filter.

How does Teamed compare itself to other EOR providers?

Side-by-side hubs that compare on structural differences: FX disclosure, specialist vs ticket queue, graduation model. Not feature checklists. Every claim cites a primary source; we acknowledge competitor strengths where accurate.

Teamed, head to head

Head-to-head

Teamed vs ADP, an honest comparison

ADP's global EOR is partner-delivered via G-P, not owned entities. Core ADP strengths are US PEO at scale and multi-country payroll consolidation. Teamed is a direct EOR with its own entities in 57 countries, a flat $599 fee, and real HR and legal experts on every plan.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Atlas, an honest comparison

Both headline at $599. Atlas markets itself as a 'Direct EOR' in 160+ countries; Teamed reaches 180+ through 57 owned entities plus vetted partners. The decision turns on FX visibility, support responsiveness, HRIS fit and who helps you move to your own entity when the time comes.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Boundless in 2026

Teamed publishes $599 USD flat and absorbs FX at zero markup on every invoice. Boundless publishes 600 EUR per employee per month and does not disclose its FX spread. Boundless is Europe-first and now a Payoneer subsidiary; Teamed reaches roughly 180 countries and tells you when EOR is no longer the right model.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Deel, an honest comparison

Both headline at $599, and coverage is broad on both sides (Teamed 180+ countries, Deel 150-plus), so this is not a price or coverage race. We score the two on the dimensions a real buyer weighs, and we lose the ones we honestly lose. Teamed leads cost honesty, human support, HRIS fit and the path to your own entity. Deel leads all-in-one platform depth and brand. Coverage, compliance and benefits are draws.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Globalization Partners in 2026

Teamed publishes its $599 fee and absorbs FX at zero markup on every invoice. G-P does not publish pricing; every engagement starts with a custom quote. The structural difference: Teamed is built for rapidly growing companies; G-P's model is designed for large enterprise.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Gusto, an honest guide to global hiring

Gusto leads US payroll and HR, with global EOR as a Remote-powered bolt-on covering roughly 12 countries. Teamed is a dedicated global EOR across 180+ countries at $599 flat, FX absorbed at zero markup. For serious multi-country employment, they're not the same product.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Horizons (now Remote People), an honest comparison

Horizons (now Remote People) opens at $199 per employee per month, $400 below Teamed's flat $599. The honest gap is in the FX line: Horizons publishes no EOR currency-conversion policy. Teamed absorbs FX at zero markup and shows the applied rate on every invoice. Choose on whether the headline or the total cost matters more.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Insperity, EOR or PEO for a growing company

Insperity is the largest dedicated US PEO. It co-employs your US team and pools Fortune-500-level benefits. Teamed is a global EOR at $599 flat, FX absorbed at zero markup, in 180+ countries. The moment you hire outside the US, Insperity stops.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Justworks, an honest comparison

Both headline at $599, so this isn't a price race. Justworks is a US PEO with EOR as a newer bolt-on. Teamed is EOR-first and global-native. The choice turns on where you hire, whether you can see the FX, and which model fits the HRIS you already run.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Multiplier, the full-cost head-to-head

Multiplier publishes a base of roughly $400 per employee per month. Teamed is $599. Multiplier doesn't disclose its currency-conversion fee upfront; third-party reviews report a spread that can run high. Teamed absorbs FX at zero markup and shows the applied rate against mid-market on every invoice.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Native Teams, an honest comparison

Native Teams starts at $99 per employee per month; Teamed is $599 flat. That gap is real and we say so. But price is one dimension of five. Teamed leads FX transparency, real HR and legal expert access, and HRIS integration. Native Teams leads contractor payments breadth and sticker price.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Omnipresent, after the Deel acquisition

Omnipresent is no longer an independent EOR. Deel acquired it in October 2025, and the omnipresent.com website is now offline. Clients are migrating to Deel. Teamed is a stable, independent EOR at $599 flat, with zero FX markup and real HR and legal experts on every plan.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Oyster, two approaches to global EOR compared

Oyster publishes a $599 to $699 range, is a certified B-Corp, and leads on automated onboarding. Teamed is flat at $599, absorbs FX at zero markup, owns its German entity, and tells you the month EOR is no longer the right model.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Papaya Global, advisory depth vs enterprise payroll platform

Papaya Global is enterprise payroll infrastructure; Teamed is an advisory EOR for growing companies. Three differences matter: whether FX is absorbed at zero markup on your invoice, whether you can reach a real HR or legal expert directly, and whether your provider tells you when EOR stops fitting.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Remofirst, an honest comparison

Remofirst headlines at $199 and Teamed at $599. The $400 gap is real, and Remofirst wins it. The rest of this comparison is about what that gap buys: FX transparency, legal depth in complex markets, and a path to your own entity. Teamed leads all three.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Remote, the $599 head-to-head

Both headline at $599. Remote's $599 requires annual billing (month to month is $699), and its FX is a disclosed variable spread rather than zero markup. Teamed is flat at $599, absorbs FX at zero markup, and tells you when EOR is no longer the right model.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Rippling EOR, the 2026 head-to-head

Rippling EOR bundles global hiring into an HR and IT platform but doesn't publish its EOR price, covers fewer countries than dedicated providers, and layers a base platform fee on top. Teamed is $599 flat, FX absorbed at zero markup, and tells you when EOR is no longer the right model.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Safeguard Global in 2026

Teamed publishes its $599 fee and absorbs FX at zero markup on every invoice. Safeguard Global does not publish pricing; every engagement starts with a custom quote. Safeguard has 18 years of EOR history and emerging-market depth. Teamed is built specifically for rapidly growing companies that need cost transparency from day one.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Skuad, a full cost-and-service comparison

Skuad (now Payoneer Workforce Management) starts from $199 per employee per month and brings a broad all-in-one platform with a genuinely strong contractor stack. Teamed is $599 flat, FX absorbed at zero markup and shown against mid-market on every invoice. The headline gap is real. So are the adds on the Skuad side: an undisclosed FX conversion run through Payoneer's rails, a required deposit, payroll pre-funding and bolt-on modules. Model the full landed cost before you decide.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs TriNet, an honest comparison

TriNet is a strong US PEO with deep US benefits and payroll. Its international EOR is delivered through a third-party partner (Multiplier), not TriNet-owned entities. Teamed is a native global EOR with transparent $599 flat pricing, real HR and legal experts on every plan, and a path to your own managed entity.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Teamed vs Velocity Global (Pebl), the $599 head-to-head

Velocity Global starts at $599 but G2 reviewers put the real cost 30 to 50% higher in practice. Teamed is flat at $599, absorbs FX at zero markup, and tells you when EOR is no longer the right model. The difference shows up on your invoice.

Read more →

Best EOR by country

By country

The best EOR providers in Albania in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a rubric built around Albania's rules: social contributions, the Labor Code, and the crossover to your own entity. Teamed leads on cost transparency and lifecycle. Oyster leads on onboarding. G-P leads on compliance depth. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Argentina in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Argentina's rules: the Ley de Contrato de Trabajo, mandatory aguinaldo, generous severance indemnification, and the peso volatility that makes FX transparency unusually important here. Teamed leads on Argentine employment-law depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Armenia in 2026

No single winner. Eight EOR providers scored on a published rubric built around Armenia's rules: RA Labour Code compliance, mandatory funded pensions and AMD FX transparency. Teamed leads on compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Multiplier lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Australia in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Australia's rules: the Fair Work Act, the eleven National Employment Standards, Modern Awards, and the 12% superannuation guarantee. Teamed leads on compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Austria in 2026

No single winner. Eight providers scored on Austrian employment law, Sonderzahlungen handling, Betriebsrat exposure and FX transparency. Teamed leads on Austrian compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding speed. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Bangladesh in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Bangladesh's rules: the Labour Act 2006, festival leave entitlements, gratuity and the Workers' Profit Participation Fund. Teamed leads on employment-law expertise and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel leads on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Belgium in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Belgium's rules: Works Council law, the joint-committee CLA web, double holiday pay, and the month your own BV/SRL beats EOR. Teamed leads on Belgian compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding speed. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Brazil in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Brazil's rules: CLT employment law, eSocial reporting and an employer burden of roughly 55 to 70% above gross salary. Teamed leads on Brazilian employment-law expertise and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Bulgaria in 2026

No single winner. Eight EOR providers are scored on a published rubric built around Bulgaria's rules: the Labour Code, NRA registration, the BGN/EUR currency-board peg, and the month your own EOOD beats EOR on cost. Teamed leads on cost transparency and lifecycle. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Canada in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Canada's rules: ten provinces each with their own Employment Standards Act, Quebec's Civil Code and French language requirements, and the month your own Canadian corporation beats EOR. Teamed leads on compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in China in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric: Labor Contract Law compliance, employer social contributions of 30 to 40% in major cities, and the path to your own Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise (WFOE). G-P leads on China compliance depth. Teamed leads on cost transparency and lifecycle. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Colombia in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Colombia's rules: parafiscales, prima de servicios, cesantias and the month your own SAS beats EOR. Teamed leads on Colombian compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Egypt in 2026

No single winner. Eight EOR providers scored on one published rubric covering Egyptian Labour Law, social insurance, work permits and the path to your own company. Teamed leads on compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in France in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around France's rules: Conventions Collectives, CSE obligations, and the month your own SAS beats EOR. Teamed leads on French compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Germany in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Germany's rules: Works Council law, termination protection, and the month your own GmbH beats EOR. Teamed leads on German employment-law expertise and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Hong Kong in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Hong Kong rules: MPF contributions, the Employment Ordinance, and the point your own HK Limited company makes more sense than EOR. Teamed leads on cost transparency and lifecycle to entity. Deel and Rippling lead on platform. Oyster leads on onboarding.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in India in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around India's rules: Provident Fund, Employee State Insurance, state-level Professional Tax, Gratuity, and the month your own Pvt. Ltd. beats EOR. Teamed leads on India compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Indonesia in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Indonesia's rules: Omnibus Law terminations, BPJS Ketenagakerjaan and Kesehatan contributions, THR before Eid al-Fitr, and the month your own PT PMA beats EOR. Teamed leads on compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Ireland in 2026

Eight providers, one rubric. Teamed owns an Irish entity and leads on compliance depth and cost transparency. Deel and Remote lead on platform breadth, Oyster on onboarding speed. No single winner. Pick the column that fits your Ireland hire, then read the write-ups.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Italy in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Italy's rules: CCNL selection, TFR management, employer social contributions, and the month your own Srl beats EOR. Teamed leads on Italian employment-law expertise and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Japan in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a Japan-focused rubric: the 36 Agreement, Labor Standards Act termination rules, FX transparency on JPY conversions, and the month your own Kabushiki Kaisha beats EOR. Teamed leads on Japan compliance and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The 8 best EOR providers in Kenya in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Kenya's demands: the Employment Act 2007, NSSF obligations, the Affordable Housing Levy, and KES FX on salary conversions. Teamed leads on compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel leads on platform. Read the column that matters to your hire.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Malaysia in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Malaysia's rules: EPF contributions, SOCSO and EIS obligations, the Employment Act 1955 post-2022 amendment, and the crossover to your own Sdn. Bhd. Teamed leads on cost transparency and the lifecycle to your own entity. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Mexico in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Mexico's rules: IMSS contributions, PTU profit sharing, aguinaldo, and REPSE compliance since the 2021 outsourcing reform. Teamed leads on Mexican legal depth and cost transparency. Oyster and Deel lead on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Morocco in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Morocco's rules: Code du Travail compliance, CNSS and AMO social contributions, and the month your own SARL beats EOR. Teamed leads on cost transparency and lifecycle. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in the Netherlands in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Dutch rules: the transitievergoeding from day one, WAB permanent vs flex costs, and the month your own BV beats EOR. Teamed leads on Dutch compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers for hiring in Nigeria in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Nigeria's demands: the Labour Act, the Contributory Pension Scheme, NSITF contributions, and NGN FX on a volatile currency. Teamed leads on compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding speed. Deel and Rippling lead on platform. Read the column that matters most to your hire.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Norway in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Norway's rules: the Working Environment Act, employer national insurance at 14.1% in Zone 1, and the month your own AS beats EOR. Teamed leads on Norwegian employment-law depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Pakistan in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Pakistan's framework: dual-track federal and provincial labor law, EOBI contributions, and the month your own Private Limited Company beats EOR. Teamed leads on Pakistan employment-law depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in the Philippines in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around the Philippines' rules: SSS, PhilHealth and Pag-IBIG contributions, the mandatory 13th month pay, and the month your own Philippine corporation beats EOR. Teamed leads on cost transparency and compliance depth. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Poland in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Poland's rules: ZUS social contributions, PPK enrollment, Kodeks Pracy protections, and the month your own sp. z o.o. beats EOR. Teamed leads on Polish compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Portugal in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a rubric built around Portugal's rules: 13th and 14th month salary obligations, 23.75% employer social contributions, and the month your own Lda beats EOR. Teamed leads on employment-law expertise and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Romania in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Romania's rules: employer CAM contributions, Codul Muncii protections, the IT income tax exemption removal from January 2024, and the path to your own SRL. Teamed leads on Romanian compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Saudi Arabia in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on one published rubric: Nitaqat Saudization quotas, Kafala/Iqama sponsorship for expat hires, end-of-service gratuity, and the month your own Saudi entity beats EOR. Teamed leads on Saudi compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Singapore in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Singapore's rules: CPF contributions, Employment Pass COMPASS assessments, and the month your own Pte. Ltd. beats EOR. Teamed leads on cost transparency and the lifecycle to your own entity. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The 8 best EOR providers in South Africa in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around South Africa's demands: the Labour Relations Act, BBBEE requirements, and ZAR FX on salary conversions. Teamed leads on compliance depth and cost transparency. Remote leads with an owned South African entity. Deel leads on platform. Read the column that matters to your hire.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in South Korea in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around South Korea's rules: mandatory severance, the four major insurances, and the month your own Korean entity beats EOR. Teamed leads on Korean employment-law depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Spain in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Spain's rules: Convenio Colectivo law, termination indemnification, and the month your own Sociedad Limitada beats EOR. Teamed leads on Spanish compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Sweden in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Sweden's rules: employment protection law (LAS), collective agreements, and the month your own AB beats EOR. Teamed leads on Swedish employment-law expertise and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Switzerland in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Switzerland's rules: BVG pension enrollment, CCT/GAV collective agreements, and the month your own AG beats EOR. Teamed leads on Swiss compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Turkiye in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around Turkiye's rules: Is Kanunu termination law, SGK social contributions and Turkish Lira volatility. Teamed leads on Turkish employment-law depth and FX transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Ukraine in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built for Ukraine: martial law employment obligations, UAH FX transparency, and the month your own TOV beats EOR. Teamed leads on Ukraine employment-law depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Remote lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in the UAE in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around UAE rules: EOSB accruals, Wages Protection System compliance, and the month your own UAE entity beats EOR. Teamed leads on UAE compliance depth, cost transparency and the lifecycle to your own entity. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in the United Kingdom in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around UK rules: IR35 off-payroll working, PAYE and employer National Insurance, right-to-work checks, and the month your own UK Limited company beats EOR. Teamed leads on UK compliance depth and cost transparency. Oyster leads on onboarding speed. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in the United States in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on one published rubric: US state compliance, benefits administration, platform depth, and the path to your own entity. Rippling leads on US compliance depth. Deel leads on platform and onboarding. Teamed leads on cost transparency and lifecycle to entity.

Read more →

By country

The best EOR providers in Vietnam in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a rubric built around Vietnam's Labor Code 2019 and the crossover to a Foreign-Invested Enterprise. Teamed leads on cost transparency, compliance depth and lifecycle. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

Best EOR by need

By need

The best EOR providers for agencies in 2026

No single winner. Eight EOR providers scored on one rubric built for how agencies hire: FX you can show your clients, contractor-to-employee conversion with misclassification cover, and a path to your own entity. Teamed leads on cost and lifecycle. Oyster leads on onboarding speed. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By need

The best EOR providers for consultancies in 2026

No single winner. Eight EOR providers scored on one rubric built for consultancies: mixed contractor-and-employee workforces, cost visibility you can pass to clients, fast project ramp-up and a clear path to your own entity. Teamed leads cost transparency and lifecycle, Deel on contractor flex, Oyster on onboarding speed.

Read more →

By need

The best EOR providers for hiring developers in 2026

No single answer. We scored eight providers on one rubric built for how dev teams hire: IP protection in employment contracts, FX transparency at engineer salary levels, contractor-to-EOR pathways, and the crossover to your own entity. Remote leads on IP protection. Rippling and Deel lead on platform and integrations. Teamed leads on cost transparency and lifecycle.

Read more →

By need

The best EOR providers for enterprise in 2026

Eight providers scored on one rubric built for enterprise: compliance depth, cost clarity at scale, enterprise HRIS integration, real governance and a path from EOR to owned entities. G-P and Teamed lead compliance. Rippling and Deel lead integrations. Teamed leads cost transparency and the entity lifecycle. Read the scorecard, then pick the column that fits your brief.

Read more →

By need

The best EOR providers for hiring in Europe in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on one published rubric: GDPR compliance, Works Councils, cross-border FX and the path to your own EU subsidiary. Teamed leads on compliance depth and cost transparency. Remote on owned-entity coverage. Oyster on onboarding. Deel and Rippling on platform.

Read more →

By need

The best EOR providers for fintech companies in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a rubric built around what fintech companies actually need: a vendor that clears a security review, transparent FX on six-figure engineering salaries, fast cross-border hiring, and a clear path to your own licensed entity. Rippling, G-P and Papaya lead on security certifications. Teamed leads on cost transparency and the lifecycle to your own entity. Oyster leads on onboarding speed. Deel and Rippling lead on platform.

Read more →

By need

Best EOR for nonprofits in 2026

No single provider wins every column. Teamed leads on cost transparency and the path to your own entity, Oyster on fast onboarding and B-Corp values alignment, Deel and Rippling on platform depth. Pick the column that fits your grant constraints and your mission countries.

Read more →

By need

The best EOR providers for recruitment agencies in 2026

Eight providers scored on a rubric built for agencies: speed to first payroll, FX clarity for client invoicing, contractor-to-EOR lifecycle, platform volume and compliance depth. Deel and Oyster lead onboarding speed. Teamed leads cost transparency and the lifecycle. Rippling and Deel lead platform. G-P leads compliance. Pick the column that fits your brief.

Read more →

By need

The best EOR providers for remote teams in 2026

No single answer. Eight EOR providers, one rubric built around what remote teams need: FX transparency across currencies, human support across time zones, multi-jurisdiction compliance depth, and a path from EOR to your own entity. Teamed leads on cost and lifecycle, Deel and Rippling on platform, Oyster on published support response time.

Read more →

By need

The best EOR providers for SaaS companies in 2026

No single answer. Eight EOR providers scored on one SaaS-focused rubric: IP protection in employment contracts, HRIS integration depth, onboarding speed, cost transparency and a lifecycle path. Rippling leads on integrations and onboarding. Remote leads on IP protection. Teamed leads on cost transparency and lifecycle to entity.

Read more →

By need

The best EOR for scaleups in 2026

Eight EORs scored on one rubric. Teamed leads on FX transparency and the path to your own entity. Deel leads on platform breadth. Rippling leads on integrations. Oyster leads on onboarding speed. Remote leads on owned entities. No single winner. Pick the column that matches where your company is heading.

Read more →

By need

The best EOR providers for small business in 2026

No single winner. Eight EOR providers scored on one rubric built for small-business buyers: cost fit, compliance advisory without a dedicated HR team, and a path to your own entity. Teamed leads on cost and compliance. Oyster leads on onboarding. Deel and Rippling lead on platform. Pick the column that matters most.

Read more →

By need

The best EOR providers for startups in 2026

No single answer. We scored seven EOR providers on one rubric built for how startups actually hire: burn-rate pricing, fast first hires, flexibility with no enterprise minimums, and a clear path to your own entity. Teamed leads on cost transparency and lifecycle. Deel and Rippling lead on platform. Native Teams and Remofirst lead on entry price.

Read more →

By need

The best EOR providers for tech companies in 2026

No single answer. We scored eight EOR providers on one rubric built around what tech teams actually need: IP protection in employment contracts, integration depth with engineering stacks, jurisdiction expertise in tech hiring markets, cost transparency and a clear path to your own entity. Rippling and Deel lead on platform. Remote leads on IP protection. Teamed leads on cost transparency and lifecycle.

Read more →

By need

The 8 best EOR services in 2026

It depends on your priorities. Teamed leads on cost transparency and lifecycle management. Deel leads on platform breadth. Remote on owned-entity depth in core markets. Oyster on onboarding speed. The eight providers here cover the realistic shortlist for growing companies hiring across borders in 2026.

Read more →

By need

The best EOR software in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight EOR software platforms on one published rubric: compliance depth, cost transparency, platform features, onboarding speed, and the path to your own entity. Deel and Rippling lead on platform. Oyster leads on onboarding. Teamed leads on compliance, cost transparency and lifecycle.

Read more →

By need

The 8 best global EOR providers in 2026

Eight global EOR providers scored on one published rubric. No single winner: Teamed leads on multi-region compliance depth and FX transparency, Deel leads on platform breadth, Oyster on onboarding speed. Pick the column that fits your international footprint, then read the write-ups.

Read more →

By need

The top EOR companies in 2026, scored on one rubric

Eight EOR companies scored on one published rubric. No single winner: Teamed leads compliance depth and cost transparency, Deel leads on platform, Oyster leads onboarding. Pick the column that matters to your business, then read the write-ups.

Read more →

Alternatives to a provider

Alternatives

The best Atlas alternatives in 2026

Eight Atlas alternatives scored on one published rubric. No single winner. Teamed leads on cost transparency and the path to your own entity. Deel leads on platform. Oyster on onboarding. G-P and Papaya on enterprise scale. Remote on owned-entity confidence and product polish. Pick the column that matters most.

Read more →

Alternatives

The best Deel competitors and alternatives in 2026

There's no single winner. We scored ten Deel alternatives on one published rubric. Teamed leads on cost transparency and the path to your own entity, Rippling on platform, Oyster on onboarding, G-P and Papaya on enterprise scale. Deel stays the broadest. Pick the column that matters to you, then read the write-ups.

Read more →

Alternatives

The 8 best Globalization Partners (G-P) alternatives in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight G-P alternatives on one published rubric. Teamed leads on compliance depth, cost transparency and the path to your own entity. Deel and Rippling lead on platform. Oyster leads on onboarding speed. Pick the column that fits your priorities, then read the write-ups.

Read more →

Alternatives

The 8 best Gusto alternatives for international hiring in 2026

Gusto is a strong US payroll and HR platform. Its international EOR product, Gusto Global, covers 12 countries via a Remote partnership at $699 per employee per month. Eight dedicated EOR providers cover up to 180 countries at comparable or lower fees, with real employment-law experts and clearer paths to your own entity. We scored all eight on one published rubric. No overall winner.

Read more →

Alternatives

The best Horizons alternatives in 2026

Eight Horizons alternatives scored on one published rubric. Teamed leads cost transparency and the path to your own entity, Deel and Remote on platform depth, Oyster on onboarding. Horizons carries a $199 entry price. Pick the column that matters, then read the write-ups.

Read more →

Alternatives

The 8 best Justworks alternatives in 2026

There's no single winner. We scored eight Justworks alternatives on one published rubric. Teamed leads on compliance depth, cost transparency and the path to your own entity. Deel leads on platform breadth. Oyster leads on onboarding. Pick the column that matches your priority, then read the write-ups.

Read more →

Alternatives

The 8 best Multiplier alternatives and competitors in 2026

There's no single winner. We scored eight Multiplier alternatives on one published rubric. Teamed leads on compliance depth, cost transparency and the path to your own entity. Deel and Rippling lead on platform breadth. Oyster leads on onboarding speed. Pick the column that matters most, then read the write-ups.

Read more →

Alternatives

The best Native Teams alternatives in 2026

There's no single winner. We scored eight Native Teams alternatives on one published rubric. Teamed leads on cost transparency and the path to your own entity, Rippling and Deel on platform and integrations, Remote on owned entities, Oyster on onboarding speed. Native Teams keeps the lowest entry price. Pick the column that matters to you.

Read more →

Alternatives

The best Omnipresent alternatives in 2026

Omnipresent was acquired by Deel in October 2025 and its website is now offline. Former clients are on Deel. We scored eight alternatives on one published rubric. Teamed leads cost transparency and lifecycle, Remote product polish, Oyster onboarding speed. Pick the column that fits your priority, then read the write-ups.

Read more →

Alternatives

The 8 best Oyster HR alternatives in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight Oyster HR alternatives on one published rubric. Teamed leads on compliance depth, cost transparency and the path to your own entity. Deel and Rippling lead on platform. Multiplier leads on onboarding speed. Pick the column that fits your priorities, then read the write-ups.

Read more →

Alternatives

The 8 best Papaya Global alternatives in 2026

No single winner. We scored eight Papaya Global alternatives on one published rubric. Teamed leads on compliance depth, cost transparency and the path to your own entity. Deel and Rippling lead on platform, Oyster on onboarding. Pick the column that fits your priorities, then read the write-ups.

Read more →

Alternatives

The best Remofirst competitors and alternatives in 2026

There's no single winner. We scored eight Remofirst alternatives on one published rubric. Teamed leads on cost transparency and the path to your own entity. Deel and Rippling lead on platform depth. Oyster leads on onboarding. Remote leads self-serve with owned entities. Pick the column that matters to you, then read the write-ups.

Read more →

Alternatives

The 8 best Remote alternatives and competitors in 2026

There's no single winner. We scored eight Remote alternatives on one published rubric. Teamed leads on compliance depth, cost transparency and the path to your own entity. Deel and Rippling lead on platform. Oyster leads on onboarding. Pick the column that matters most to you, then read the write-ups.

Read more →

Alternatives

The 8 best Rippling alternatives for global hiring in 2026

No single winner. Eight Rippling alternatives scored on one rubric. Teamed leads compliance depth, cost transparency and the path to your own entity. Deel leads EOR coverage. Oyster leads onboarding. None of them try to be a full HRIS. Pick the column that matters.

Read more →

Alternatives

The best Skuad alternatives in 2026

Seven Skuad alternatives scored on one published rubric. Teamed leads cost transparency and the path to your own entity, Deel and Rippling lead on platform, Oyster on onboarding, Remote on owned-entity coverage. The $199 Skuad headline is the floor, not the real cost. Pick the column that matters most.

Read more →

Alternatives

The 8 best Velocity Global alternatives in 2026

We scored eight Velocity Global alternatives on one published rubric. Teamed leads on cost transparency, compliance depth and the path to your own entity. Deel leads on platform breadth, Oyster on onboarding. Velocity Global's M&A practice is real, but its quote-led pricing is why most buyers look elsewhere. Pick the column that matters.

Read more →

Provider vs provider

Head-to-head

1099 contractor vs W-2 employee, the US classification explained

These are the two ways the United States classifies a worker, and the difference is not a preference you pick, it is a legal status that follows the facts of the relationship. A 1099 independent contractor runs their own business: the payer withholds no tax, provides no benefits, and the worker files and pays their own income and self-employment tax while controlling how the work is done. A W-2 employee is employed by the company: the employer withholds income, Social Security and Medicare tax, pays the employer share plus unemployment tax, provides statutory protections, and directs the work. The IRS decides status on common-law control, not on the label on the contract. Get it wrong and the cost is back taxes, penalties and statutory liabilities.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Contractor vs employee, how to decide which one the work needs

Engage an independent contractor when the work is short, clearly defined, and genuinely independent: the worker controls how and when it gets done, brings their own tools, and is free to serve other clients. Hire an employee when the work is ongoing, when you need to direct how it is done, or when you want to retain the person and own what they create. Contractors avoid employer taxes, benefits and statutory protections, but getting the line wrong is misclassification, which carries back taxes, penalties and benefit claims. The test is the substance of the relationship, not the label on the contract. An Employer of Record removes that risk by employing the person compliantly on your behalf where employment is the honest answer.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Deel vs Globalization Partners, compared on one rubric

G-P leads on owned-entity depth and compliance scale. Deel leads on platform maturity and onboarding speed. Neither publishes FX terms or a per-employee fee you can model before a sales call. Teamed, who produced this guide, is the disclosed alternative when cost transparency and real HR and legal expertise on all plans matter most.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Deel vs Multiplier: which EOR is right for global hiring?

Neither wins outright. Deel leads on platform breadth and one of the broadest native integration catalogues in the category. Multiplier leads on onboarding speed and has a lower published base fee. Neither publishes its FX terms. If transparent cost and compliance depth matter, Teamed, the publisher of this page, is the alternative worth running alongside both.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Deel vs Native Teams, scored on one rubric

Deel wins on platform breadth and the deepest integration catalogue. Native Teams wins on entry price ($99 a month) and contractor tooling. Neither publishes a numeric FX spread. For cost transparency and real experts on every plan, there's a third option worth reading.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Deel vs Oyster, compared on one rubric

Neither wins overall. Oyster leads on onboarding speed, dedicated CSM support and B-Corp certification. Deel leads on platform breadth and established EOR maturity. Neither discloses FX on salary conversions. Teamed, who produced this guide, is the disclosed alternative when cost transparency and real legal expertise matter more.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Deel vs Papaya Global, compared on one rubric

Neither wins overall. Deel leads on onboarding speed and dedicated EOR maturity. Papaya Global leads on enterprise payroll automation, 130+ payment currencies and multi-country finance reporting. Neither publishes FX terms on salary conversions. Teamed, who produced this guide, is the disclosed alternative when cost transparency and real legal expertise matter more than platform scale.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Deel vs Remote, the 2026 EOR head-to-head

Both headline near $599 per employee per month. Deel leads on platform breadth and the widest integration catalogue in the category. Remote leads on its owned-entity network and a named customer success manager on the base plan. Neither publishes an FX rate. Teamed, which wrote this, is the third option on the table and is built differently from both. It bills a flat $599, absorbs FX at zero markup and shows the applied rate on every invoice, owns its EOR entities in 57 countries, and puts real HR and legal experts on every plan.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Deel vs Rippling, compared on one rubric

Neither wins overall. Rippling leads on platform: 600+ integrations and unified HR, IT and payroll on one system. Deel leads on EOR maturity and onboarding speed across its established market footprint. Neither publishes FX terms. Teamed, who produced this guide, is the disclosed alternative when cost transparency and real legal expertise matter more than platform breadth.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Deel vs Velocity Global, compared on one rubric

Neither wins overall. Deel leads platform maturity and onboarding speed. Velocity Global leads owned-entity depth, with 65 entities across 185+ countries and real M&A and immigration expertise. Neither publishes FX terms. Teamed, who produced this guide, is the disclosed alternative when cost transparency and a path to your own entity matter more.

Read more →

Head-to-head

EOR vs AOR, which model fits the person you are hiring

An Employer of Record (EOR) legally employs your workers as their in-country employer and runs payroll, tax, benefits and compliance. An Agent of Record (AOR), sometimes called a Contractor of Record, engages and pays independent contractors on your behalf and shields you from misclassification on the contractor side, but it does not employ them. So the choice is not which is better, it is which matches the working relationship. Use an EOR for employees. Use an AOR for genuinely independent contractors. Many providers, Teamed included, offer both.

Read more →

Head-to-head

EOR vs global payroll, which one do you actually need?

They solve different problems. Global payroll PAYS people you already employ through your OWN legal entities, so it presumes you have an entity in every country you pay in. An Employer of Record IS the legal employer through its own entity, so you can hire in a country where you have no entity at all. Most scaling companies end up running both: an EOR in the countries where they have no entity, and global payroll where they already do. The honest answer is not one or the other, it is knowing which rung you are on, country by country.

Read more →

Head-to-head

EOR vs your own entity, an honest build-vs-buy guide

It is a build-vs-buy decision, not a right-or-wrong one. An Employer of Record (EOR) is the buy option: you hire in weeks with no entity, and the EOR is the legal employer that carries the local obligations. Your own legal entity is the build option: full control, but setup time and cost plus ongoing accounting, payroll and compliance that you carry. The deciding factor is headcount per country. Below the crossover point, EOR usually wins on speed, cost and risk. Above it, your own entity wins. Teamed models that crossover honestly and, when your own entity becomes the better structure, can set it up and keep running it for you in 90+ countries.

Read more →

Head-to-head

EOR vs PEO, which employment model fits your expansion

The deciding question is whether you already have a legal entity in the country. A PEO co-employs your people through your own registered entity, so it needs you to be set up there first. An EOR is the legal employer through its own entity, so you can hire in a country where you have no entity at all. Use an EOR to enter a new market quickly and compliantly. Use a PEO to outsource HR and payroll admin where you are already established, usually at home.

Read more →

Head-to-head

EOR vs staffing agency, which one do you actually need?

These are different tools for different jobs. An Employer of Record (EOR) legally employs a person you have already chosen, so you can direct their day-to-day work for the long term while the EOR runs compliant payroll, tax and benefits in their country. A staffing or recruitment agency sources and supplies workers it manages, usually for temporary or short-term cover. If you have picked your person and want them employed compliantly, you want an EOR. If you need short-term cover or you want someone to find candidates for you, a staffing agency is the better fit.

Read more →

Head-to-head

EOR vs umbrella company, which one do you actually need?

They solve different jobs, so this is not a head-to-head you win on price. An umbrella company employs UK contractors and runs their pay through PAYE, usually inside IR35 and usually via a recruitment agency on short-term work. An Employer of Record (EOR) is the full legal employer for a permanent hire in a country where you have no entity, most often abroad. If you are paying a UK contractor through an agency, you want an umbrella. If you are hiring someone permanently overseas, you want an EOR.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Multiplier vs Papaya Global, compared on one rubric in 2026

Neither wins overall. Multiplier leads on onboarding speed and self-serve access, with EOR from $400. Papaya Global leads on enterprise payroll infrastructure and platform depth, with EOR from $499. Neither discloses what it charges on salary conversions. We scored both on one rubric, then introduced Teamed as the disclosed publisher and recommended alternative.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Multiplier vs Velocity Global: which EOR fits your team?

Neither wins outright. Multiplier leads on onboarding speed and human support from day one. Velocity Global (now Pebl) leads on platform depth and integration breadth. Where both fall short is cost transparency: neither publishes its FX terms. That's where Teamed, the publisher of this comparison and the recommended alternative, earns its place on the rubric.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Native Teams vs Multiplier, compared on one rubric in 2026

Neither wins overall. Native Teams leads on the lowest published entry price, from $99, and a dedicated Entity Management product from $149 a month. Multiplier leads on compliance depth with 100+ in-house legal and tax experts. Neither publishes its FX terms clearly. Teamed, who produced this guide, is the disclosed alternative.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Oyster vs Multiplier, compared on one rubric in 2026

Neither wins overall. Oyster leads on onboarding speed, dedicated CSMs and B-Corp certification. Multiplier leads on platform depth and publishes a lower base from around $400. Neither discloses FX on salary conversions. We scored both on one rubric, then introduced Teamed as the disclosed publisher and recommended alternative.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Oyster vs Papaya Global, compared on one rubric in 2026

Neither wins overall. Oyster leads on onboarding speed, published flat pricing and B-Corp certification. Papaya Global leads on enterprise platform depth, a broad integration catalogue and a lower starting rate. Neither discloses its FX on salary conversions. We scored both on one rubric, then introduced Teamed as the disclosed publisher and recommended alternative.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Oyster vs Velocity Global, compared on one rubric in 2026

Neither wins overall. Velocity Global (now Pebl) leads on platform depth and a broad integration catalogue. Oyster leads on onboarding speed, dedicated support and B-Corp certification. Neither discloses its FX on salary conversions. We scored both on one rubric, then introduced Teamed as the disclosed publisher and recommended alternative.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Papaya Global vs Globalization Partners: which EOR wins in 2026?

They solve different problems. Papaya leads on enterprise payments and payroll platform. G-P leads on compliance certification depth and 180-plus country coverage. Neither publishes a transparent EOR price. We scored both on the same rubric and added Teamed, the publisher of this guide, as a disclosed alternative.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Papaya Global vs Multiplier: which EOR is right for your team?

Neither wins outright. Papaya Global leads on enterprise payroll automation and 130+ payroll currencies. Multiplier leads on onboarding speed and a lower published base fee. Neither discloses FX terms. If cost transparency and compliance depth matter, Teamed, the publisher of this page, is the alternative worth running alongside both.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Remote vs Globalization Partners, compared on one rubric

Neither wins overall. G-P leads on compliance scale: 180+ countries, 100+ entities and the deepest certification stack in this comparison. Remote leads on onboarding speed and a polished dedicated-EOR product at a published price. Remote discloses a variable FX spread; G-P publishes no EOR pricing at all. Teamed, who produced this guide, is the disclosed alternative when transparent FX and a path to your own entity matter most.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Remote vs Multiplier, compared on one rubric in 2026

Both reach roughly 180 countries. Remote leads on owned-entity compliance depth, with entities in 90+ core markets. Multiplier leads on onboarding speed and publishes a lower base from around $400. Neither shows the real FX on salary conversions clearly. We scored both on one rubric, then introduced Teamed as the disclosed publisher and recommended alternative.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Remote vs Oyster, compared on one rubric

Neither wins overall. Remote leads on owned-entity depth and platform maturity. Oyster leads on onboarding speed and B-Corp certification. Remote discloses a variable FX spread; Oyster does not separately itemise FX. Teamed, who produced this guide, is the disclosed alternative when cost transparency and real legal expertise matter more.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Remote vs Papaya Global in 2026

It depends on your team. Remote is the product-led pick: faster onboarding, $599 on annual billing, owned entities across 90+ markets and polished self-serve. Papaya Global is the enterprise-payroll pick: 130+ payroll currencies, multi-country consolidation and audit-ready filing. Different strengths for different buyers. Pick the column that matters.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Remote vs Rippling, compared on one rubric

Neither wins overall. Remote leads on EOR maturity and owned-entity compliance. Rippling leads on platform: 600+ integrations and unified HR, IT and payroll. Remote discloses a variable FX spread; Rippling doesn't publish EOR pricing. Teamed, who produced this guide, is the disclosed alternative when transparent FX and real legal expertise matter most.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Remote vs Velocity Global (now Pebl)

Remote owns entities in 90+ EOR markets and runs the more polished product. Velocity Global (now Pebl) publishes a flat $399 and broader reach across 185+ countries. Neither shows the FX on salary conversions. Remote leads compliance and platform; Velocity Global leads onboarding; Teamed, who produced this, leads cost transparency and lifecycle.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Rippling vs Multiplier, compared on one rubric in 2026

Neither wins overall. Rippling leads on platform, with 600+ integrations and HR, IT and payroll on one system. Multiplier leads on onboarding speed and publishes a lower base from around $400. Neither discloses the full cost clearly. This guide scores both, then introduces Teamed as the recommended alternative.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Rippling vs Oyster, compared on one rubric

Neither wins overall. Rippling leads on platform: 600+ integrations and unified HR, IT and payroll on one system across 80 EOR countries. Oyster leads on onboarding speed, a published flat price and a human SLA across 120+ EOR countries. Neither publishes FX terms. Teamed, who produced this guide, is the disclosed alternative when cost transparency and real legal expertise matter more than platform breadth.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Rippling vs Papaya Global, compared on one rubric

Neither wins overall. Rippling leads on platform: 600+ integrations, unified HR, IT and payroll across 80 EOR countries. Papaya Global leads on compliance depth and enterprise payroll scale at 160+ countries. Neither publishes FX terms. Teamed, who produced this guide, is the disclosed alternative when cost transparency and a real person on every plan come first.

Read more →

Head-to-head

Velocity Global vs Papaya Global in 2026

Neither wins outright. Velocity Global (now Pebl) leads on coverage breadth and a flat $399 headline. Papaya leads on enterprise payroll scale and a deeper certification stack. Both leave their FX terms unpublished. For a transparent invoice and a real person on every plan, a third provider is worth a look.

Read more →

Switching guides

Switching

Switching from Deel to Teamed

You have decided to leave Deel. This is the playbook for the move, not a pitch on which provider to pick. Most switches complete in four to six weeks, the operational plan is what takes the time, not the paperwork. You bring your current Deel MSA, Teamed maps the payroll calendar and the notice period (usually 30 to 90 days), keeps benefits continuous, handles the employee communications, ports the data, and runs a phased cutover one country or cohort at a time so nobody misses a payday.

Read more →

Switching

Switching from Globalization Partners to Teamed

If you have decided to leave Globalization Partners, the work is the operational cutover, not the paperwork. Most switches take about four to six weeks. Teamed maps the plan from your current G-P agreement: payroll-calendar sync, benefits continuity, employee communications, data portability and a phased cutover so your people never see a gap. Teams usually leave G-P because its EOR pricing is quote-only and process-heavy when they want published pricing, a readable invoice and a real human on every plan.

Read more →

Switching

Switching from Oyster to Teamed

You have decided to leave Oyster, so this is a migration plan, not a feature debate. Most switches take four to six weeks, and the operational sequence is what takes the time, not the paperwork. Teamed reads your current Oyster MSA, aligns the notice period, syncs the payroll calendar, holds benefits continuity, runs the employee communications and phases the cutover one country or cohort at a time so nobody misses a pay run. Teams usually move for three reasons: Oyster requires a refundable deposit for every EOR engagement, it charges a currency-conversion fee whose rate it does not publish, and its white-glove HR advisory is billed by the hour. If those are not your reasons, we say plainly below when staying on Oyster is the better call.

Read more →

Switching

Switching from Papaya Global to Teamed

You have decided to leave Papaya Global, so this is the migration playbook, not a sales pitch. Teams usually leave when they want a simpler, focused EOR instead of an enterprise payroll-automation platform priced and built for Fortune 500 buyers. The move takes about four to six weeks. The operational plan is the work, not the paperwork: align notice on your Papaya contract, sync the payroll calendar, carry benefits over, communicate with employees, port your data, then run a phased cutover so nobody sees a gap.

Read more →

Switching

Switching from Remote to Teamed

You have decided to leave Remote. This is the migration playbook, not a which-to-pick. Most switches complete in four to six weeks, and the operational plan is what takes the time, not the paperwork. The order that matters is bring your current Remote MSA, sync the payroll calendar, keep benefits continuous, plan the employee comms, port the data, then run a phased cutover inside your notice period so nobody misses a payslip. Teamed runs the cutover and keeps you out of a double-billing window.

Read more →

Switching

Switching from Rippling to Teamed

You have decided to leave Rippling's EOR. This is the migration playbook. Most switches take four to six weeks, and the operational plan is what takes the time, not the paperwork. Teamed maps the cutover from your current Rippling MSA: notice-period alignment, payroll-calendar sync, benefits continuity, employee communications and data portability, run as a phased cutover so your people never see a gap in pay or cover.

Read more →

Switching

The best EOR providers for companies switching in 2026

No single answer. We scored eight EOR providers on a published rubric built around what matters when you switch: transition support, compliance continuity, cost transparency, contract flexibility and long-term lifecycle fit. Oyster leads on transition. Teamed leads on cost and lifecycle. Remote leads on compliance. Read the rubric first, then the write-ups.

Read more →

More comparisons

Compare

Hiring in France vs Germany, an honest guide for 2026

France carries higher employer social contributions (roughly 40 to 45% of gross salary) versus Germany's 19 to 21%, but Germany triggers Works Council rights at just 5 employees while France's Comite Social et Economique starts at 11. Both are strong EU talent markets. The right choice turns on your talent pool, cost model and how many employees you plan to reach in each country.

Read more →

Compare

Hiring in the Netherlands vs Belgium, the practical employer guide

Both are Benelux markets with deep talent pools, well-established employment law, and EOR access without a local entity. The Netherlands runs lower employer on-costs (~22-25% vs Belgium's ~25-27%), offers the well-known 30% ruling for qualifying international hires, and requires a Works Council from 50 employees. Belgium delays that obligation to 100, runs a seniority-based notice formula, and has its own expat tax regime. The choice usually turns on where your hire lives, not which regime looks better on paper.

Read more →

Compare

Hiring in Spain vs Portugal, compared dimension by dimension

Spain has deeper talent in established tech and enterprise roles, but employer contributions run 30 to 33% and Convenio Colectivo compliance adds layer on layer of complexity. Portugal's employer TSU is 23.75%, termination exposure is lower, and Lisbon and Porto now compete hard for engineering and fintech talent. Neither wins on every count.

Read more →

Compare

Hire in the UK vs Germany, what the costs and rules actually look like

UK setup is faster and total employer social charges are lower. Germany gives EU market access, stronger statutory employee protections, and a deep engineering talent pool. Both markets are well-served via EOR at the same $599 Teamed fee. The right market depends on where your business needs roots, not just where the candidate lives.

Read more →

Compare

Hiring in the United States vs Canada, an honest guide

Both are English-speaking, EOR-friendly markets. The United States runs lower mandatory contributions and at-will employment in 49 states; Canada requires just cause for termination and adds ten provincial compliance layers on top of federal rules. Neither is clearly easier. The right choice depends on where your talent is and what your finance team needs to model.

Read more →

Questions about Teamed comparisons

  • Which EOR is the cheapest?
    It depends on what you mean by "cheapest". Headline fees run from ~$250/month (low-end providers) to $599/month (Deel Standard, Teamed EOR) to $899/month (Deel Enterprise). But the headline is rarely the full bill. FX markup on salary conversion typically adds 1.5 to 3%. On a $190K salary, that's $2,850 to $5,700/year per employee that never appears as a line item. Add setup fees, exit fees, "out-of-scope" charges, and the cheapest-looking provider often isn't. Teamed's EOR matches Deel's $599 headline ($599 USD or £479 GBP) with Zero FX absorbed in any currency pairing: the EOR fee bills flat in your chosen currency, no FX line at all.
  • Are all EOR providers basically the same?
    No, but most look the same in the demo because the structural differences don't show up in feature checklists. Three things decide the actual bill and the actual experience: (1) how FX margin is disclosed (most providers don't publicly disclose terms; Teamed publishes the applied rate against the mid-market reference on every invoice); (2) whether your account is handled by a real expert with local employment-law expertise or a ticket queue routed by chatbot; (3) whether the platform tells you when to graduate to your own entity, or stays silent because EOR is more profitable for them.
  • Can I switch EOR providers mid-contract?
    Yes, most EOR contracts are month-to-month or carry a 30 to 90 day notice period. The harder part is the operational cutover: cutover plan, data validation, payroll calendar alignment, benefits continuity, employee communications. Teamed runs phased cutovers (one country at a time, or one employee cohort at a time) so the overlap period is contained. Bring your current MSA to a working session and we'll map the operational plan and the deadlines.
  • How do I evaluate a competitor not yet listed here?
    Bring your current invoice to a 30-minute working session. We unbundle it line-by-line against the same model used on our live comparison hubs: gross salary, statutory at cost, platform fee, FX residual, setup/exit. The math comes out the same regardless of vendor name.

Comparing on a vendor not listed yet?

We model your real switch line-by-line. Bring your current invoice and we’ll unbundle it together. No demos, no decks.

Talk to a Specialist