Remote vs Multiplier · scored on one rubric · 2026
Remote vs Multiplier, compared on one rubric in 2026
Both reach roughly 180 countries. We scored Remote, Multiplier and Teamed on the same six-axis rubric: pricing transparency, compliance and entity coverage, platform and self-serve, security and certifications, service model and employment intelligence, and the path to your own entity. Remote leads compliance and entity coverage, with entities in 90+ core markets, and ties Teamed on pricing transparency. Multiplier leads platform and self-serve, with the fastest onboarding in this comparison. Remote and Multiplier both hold current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications; Teamed does not. Teamed leads employment intelligence and the path to your own entity. No provider sweeps every column.
1,000+ companies advised
- 3
- EOR providers scored on one rubric, no overall winner
- $599
- Remote headline fee on annual billing, matched by Teamed flat
- 6
- Rubric criteria scored per provider, no weighted total
Disclosure
This guide was produced by Teamed, which is one of the three providers scored below on the same rubric as the rest. We score Remote and Multiplier honestly, let each lead the columns it genuinely wins, and introduce Teamed only after as the disclosed publisher and recommended alternative. We don't crown an overall winner.
Remote vs Multiplier: which EOR should you choose in 2026?
Both reach roughly 180 countries. We scored Remote, Multiplier and Teamed on the same six-axis rubric: pricing transparency, compliance and entity coverage, platform and self-serve, security and certifications, service model and employment intelligence, and the path to your own entity. Remote leads compliance and entity coverage, with entities in 90+ core markets, and ties Teamed on pricing transparency. Multiplier leads platform and self-serve, with the fastest onboarding in this comparison. Remote and Multiplier both hold current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications; Teamed does not. Teamed leads employment intelligence and the path to your own entity. No provider sweeps every column.
What is the Remote vs Multiplier choice?
Remote and Multiplier are two well-reviewed Employer of Record (EOR) providers. Both legally employ your people in other countries, so you can hire compliantly abroad before you have a local entity. Remote headlines at $599 on annual billing and is owned-entity led in its core 90+ markets. Multiplier starts from around $400 and is built for speed, with a modern platform that onboards in days.
The surface similarity is real: both reach roughly 180 countries through a mix of owned entities and vetted local partners, and both have strong G2 ratings (Remote 4.6, Multiplier 4.7) and hold current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications. The differences appear in cost transparency, entity depth, and advisory support. Remote discloses its FX approach, even if the disclosed rate is a variable spread above mid-market. Multiplier's currency-conversion fee is not published upfront, so the low base may not be the real cost. Neither offers a managed path from contractor to EOR to your own entity on one system. That is where the category has room to improve, and why this guide scores all three on the same six-axis rubric, then introduces Teamed as the recommended alternative.
Methodology
How we scored this comparison
Each provider is scored 1 to 5 on six criteria. There's no weighted total and no overall winner. Remote leads compliance and entity coverage and ties Teamed on pricing transparency. Multiplier leads platform and self-serve. Remote and Multiplier both hold current security certifications, so Teamed concedes that column. Teamed, the publisher, leads employment intelligence and the path to your own entity. Teamed is scored on the same rubric and introduced as the recommended alternative after the direct comparison.
- Pricing transparency
- Whether the all-in cost of an EOR hire (the fee, the deposit, and onboarding or offboarding and termination terms) is stated up front and predictable. Scored on clarity, not on price level: a flat, published fee you can read beats a lower headline with unstated setup, notice and exit terms. The FX rate on salary conversions is one clause of that test, not the whole frame.
- Compliance and entity coverage
- Depth and legal robustness of in-country coverage: the owned-entity versus partner structure behind each provider's map, real HR and legal experts with country-specific employment-law credentials handling edge cases directly, and accuracy on contracts, payroll and statutory contributions. Broad-network providers can lead on raw breadth; Teamed leads on depth where it has an owned entity, DLA Piper as global counsel, and vetted in-country partners.
- Platform and self-serve
- Product surface, self-serve flows, integration and API depth, and speed to first payroll for teams that want to run global hiring themselves.
- Security and certifications
- ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II held today: the certifications a procurement or security review asks to see, checked against each provider on 22 July 2026.
- Service model and employment intelligence
- Ongoing human employment expertise plus AI assistance across the lifecycle: whether real HR and legal experts own the hard moments directly, and how well the system flags compliance changes and the crossover point before they reach you.
- Path to your own entity
- Whether the provider moves you from contractor to EOR to your own entity on one system, flags the crossover point proactively, and can set up the entity through a service like Global Entity and Employment Operations (GEMO).
How we gathered evidence
The six axes are pricing transparency, compliance and entity coverage, platform and self-serve, security and certifications, service model and employment intelligence, and the path to your own entity. Pricing came from each provider's own pricing page or the closest available public source (Remote verified 9 June 2026; Multiplier via g2.com on 9 June 2026 as no standalone pricing page publishes the full EOR rate; Teamed verified 16 June 2026). G2 ratings came from g2.com on 9 June 2026. Security reflects each provider's current published ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II status, checked 22 July 2026: Remote and Multiplier both hold current certifications; Teamed is ISO 27001 and SOC 2 aligned with accreditation in progress. Entity model and coverage claims came from each provider's own site. Teamed's claims come from teamed.global.
Considered & excluded
We scored Remote and Multiplier as the two providers buyers compare most directly on this query, with Teamed scored as the disclosed publisher and recommended alternative.
- Other EOR providers: This page focuses on the direct Remote vs Multiplier comparison, with Teamed as the recommended alternative. A full eight-provider best-of is at /compare/deel-alternatives.
How they score, criterion by criterion
There’s no overall winner. Each column is a different priority. Pick the ones that matter to you, then read the write-ups below.
| Provider | Pricing transparency | Compliance and entity coverage | Platform and self-serve | Security and certifications | Service model and employment intelligence | Path to your own entity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remote | Leads | Leads | Leads | |||
| Multiplier | Leads | |||||
| Teamed(us) | Leads | Leads |
Scored 1–5 on each criterion from the published rubric above. The highlighted cell leads that column. Teamed is scored on exactly the same criteria as every other provider.
#1
Remote
Best for: teams that want owned-entity compliance depth in their core markets, a polished self-serve platform, current security certifications, and pricing they can read and compare.
Remote is the owned-entity-led provider in this comparison. It owns its employing entities across its core 90+ markets, which means one accountable employer for payroll and statutory contributions in the countries you are most likely to hire in. Local partners extend the map to roughly 180 countries.
On pricing, Remote is more transparent than most of the category. The $599 headline is published, though it needs annual billing ($699 month to month), so the comparable cost depends on the commitment you can make. It also discloses its FX approach rather than leaving it unpublished, even though the disclosed rate is a variable spread above mid-market rather than a zero-markup line.
The fit is a team that wants to run global hiring as a product. Benefits administration and IP protection are genuinely mature, the self-serve flows hold up at scale, and onboarding runs in days to a few weeks per country. Remote also holds ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications today, which matters if your procurement or security review needs the certificate in hand now. Against Multiplier you trade a lower published base for owned-entity compliance depth. Against Teamed you trade a lighter advisory relationship for a more polished self-serve product.
- Countries
- ~180 via owned entities in 90+ core markets + local partners elsewhere
- Entity model
- Owned-entity led in its core countries; local partners elsewhere
- Onboarding
- Days to a few weeks per country
- Contractors
- Yes
- Pricing
- $599/mo on annual billing ($699 month to month) · verified 2026-07-22
- G2
- 4.6/5
Strengths
- Owns its employing entities in 90+ core markets, the most owned-entity-led provider in this comparison. Fewer partner hand-offs in the countries you are most likely to hire in.
- Discloses its FX approach rather than leaving it unpublished. The rate is a variable spread above mid-market, but it's on the table and comparable.
- Holds ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications today, so a procurement or security review gets the certificate in hand now rather than a promise of one later.
- A polished self-serve platform with strong benefits administration, IP-protection tooling and onboarding that runs in days to a few weeks. Published pricing, $599 on annual terms versus $699 month to month, so you can budget it without a sales call.
Watch-outs
- The $599 rate requires annual billing. Month to month is $699, so the comparable price depends on the commitment length you can make.
- The disclosed Remote FX rate is a variable spread above mid-market, not a zero-markup line. Model it on your actual salary volumes to see the real cost.
- Owned entities cover the core 90+ markets. Beyond them, delivery runs through local partners, so ask which of your countries are owned versus partner-served.
Source: remote.com/pricing
#2
Multiplier
Best for: fast-scaling teams that want a modern, well-supported platform with fast onboarding, current security certifications, and a lower published base, once the FX fee is pinned down in writing.
Multiplier is the speed-and-price alternative in this comparison. It covers about 180 countries through a mix that leans on local partners with some owned entities. The platform is modern and well-reviewed (G2 4.7 across roughly 1,300 reviews), support is responsive, and onboarding runs in days, not weeks. The published EOR base starts from around $400 per employee per month, and Multiplier holds ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications today.
The cost watch-out is the one that defines Multiplier in every comparison it appears in. The currency-conversion fee isn't published upfront. Third-party reviews report a spread that can run high, so the low base may not be the real cost on your salary volumes. Get the FX fee in writing, on your specific corridors, before comparing the headlines.
As a package the value proposition is real: a modern, certified platform, responsive support and the lowest published base in this comparison, with onboarding measured in days, the fastest route to first payroll here. The contractor and global-payroll products are strong enough to carry a mixed workforce on one platform while you scale. The undisclosed FX fee and the lighter lifecycle tooling are the two questions to resolve before signing. Against Remote you trade owned-entity depth for a lower base price and faster onboarding. Against Teamed you trade advisory depth for platform speed.
- Countries
- ~180 via local partners (some owned entities)
- Entity model
- Partner-led mix, some owned entities
- Onboarding
- Fast, typically days
- Contractors
- Yes, strong contractor and global-payroll product
- Pricing
- From ~$400 / employee / month (EOR); FX fee not disclosed · verified 2026-07-22
- G2
- 4.7/5 (1300)
Strengths
- Modern, well-reviewed platform (G2 4.7 across roughly 1,300 reviews) with responsive support and a strong contractor and global-payroll product. Onboarding typically runs in days, the fastest route to first payroll in this comparison.
- Holds ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications today, tied with Remote at the top of the security column.
- The lowest published EOR base in this comparison, from around $400 per employee per month.
- Contractor management and global payroll strong enough to carry a mixed contractor-and-employee workforce on one platform while you scale, backed by a large G2 review base of roughly 1,300 reviews.
Watch-outs
- The currency-conversion (FX) fee isn't disclosed upfront. Third-party reviews report a spread that can run high, so the low base may not be the real cost.
- Coverage leans more on partners than Remote, so ask which of your countries are owned versus partner-served before you weight the price.
- A lighter path from EOR to your own entity compared with advisory-led alternatives, which matters as your international headcount grows.
#3
Teamed
Us, scored on the same rubricBest for: rapidly growing companies with an international footprint that want the truth about FX, a real person to talk to, and one partner from first contractor to last entity.
Teamed is the advisory alternative to both Remote and Multiplier. The wedge is honesty: it shows the real FX on salary conversions against the mid-market reference and absorbs it at zero markup on the fee, and it tells you the month your own entity starts to beat EOR. Neither Remote nor Multiplier publishes either of those facts clearly.
Compliance runs through real HR and legal experts with country-specific employment law credentials who handle hard moments directly: a contested exit, a termination in a jurisdiction you haven't touched before, a compliance change that needs a fast, correct answer. Teamed owns entities in 57 countries, backs them with DLA Piper as global counsel and vetted in-country partners, so real HR and legal experts handle the hard local edge cases in-house. No AI bot wall, no support tier to unlock.
Teamed isn't trying to replace your HRIS. It plugs into the tech you already run, from your first contractor to your last legal entity via Global Entity and Employment Operations (GEMO), on one system with no re-onboarding. The self-serve platform is lighter than Remote or Multiplier, and Teamed is ISO 27001 and SOC 2 aligned, with accreditation in progress rather than the certificate in hand today. The advisory depth and the path to your own entity are the arguments for it.
- Countries
- 187+ countries covered (own entities in 57 countries + vetted partners)
- Entity model
- Own entities in 57 countries + vetted partners; sets up and runs your own entity in 100+ countries via GEMO
- Onboarding
- As little as 24 to 48 hours
- Contractors
- Yes, with misclassification cover (Guard / Protect)
- Pricing
- $599 USD / £479 GBP / employee / month, flat, FX absorbed · verified 2026-07-22
- G2
- 4.8/5
Strengths
- Shows the applied FX rate next to the mid-market reference and absorbs it at zero markup on the fee. Tells you the month your own entity beats EOR. Neither Remote nor Multiplier publishes either.
- Real HR and legal experts with country-specific employment law credentials handle edge cases directly, backed by owned entities in 57 countries, DLA Piper as global counsel, and vetted in-country partners. No AI bot wall, no Enterprise tier to unlock.
- One partner from first contractor to EOR to your own entity on one system, with crossover monitoring and no re-onboarding. Built to plug into your stack, not replace it.
- Proactive employment intelligence: quarterly reviews flag compliance changes before they become surprises, and Teamed models the month where your own entity makes more sense than EOR. There's no incentive to keep you on the model that no longer fits.
Watch-outs
- Lighter self-serve platform than Remote or Multiplier. The model is advisory, not dashboard-first, so it suits teams that want a partner over a product.
- ISO 27001 and SOC 2 aligned, with accreditation in progress, so the certificate isn't in hand today. Both Remote and Multiplier hold current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications; if your security review needs the badge issued now, ask Teamed for its current audit timeline.
- The advisory depth earns its weight across multiple countries or a growing headcount. If you have one hire in one country and no plans to add more, a faster self-serve platform may suit you better.
Source: teamed.global/pricing
Why the shortlist matters
Behind every line item is a real person, in a real place.
The fee, the FX and the support model are not abstractions. They decide whether the person you hired in Barcelona or Rome is paid right, on time, by someone who knows their employment law. That is what the ranking is really measuring.
What each stakeholder evaluates
| Criterion | Legal | Finance | People Ops | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing and FX on salary | Ask for the FX policy in writing before signing. Confirm whether salary conversion uses mid-market, a disclosed spread, or an undisclosed margin. | Remote discloses a variable FX spread above mid-market. Multiplier's currency-conversion fee is not published upfront. Teamed shows the applied rate against mid-market and absorbs it at zero markup, tying Remote on pricing transparency. Run the math on your salary corridors before comparing headlines. | An itemised FX line on every invoice avoids per-country reconciliation work when salary changes or headcount grows. | A timestamped rate against a published reference is an auditable record. An undisclosed spread isn't. |
| Owned entity or partner | Ask whether the provider hires via an owned entity or a vetted partner in each country you hire in. It changes who carries the employer obligations. | An owned entity removes a partner margin layer in that country. Every provider in this comparison runs a mix, so price the chain country by country. | Real HR and legal experts with direct accountability beat a generalist partner queue at the hard moments: a contested termination or a compliance change. | Owned entity means one data-processing chain rather than a partner sub-processor. |
| Security certifications | Ask each provider for its current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certificate and audit date, not just a claim of being "in progress." | A stalled procurement or security review can push a signing date back by weeks if the certificate is not in hand. Remote and Multiplier can produce one today. Teamed is aligned with accreditation in progress. | If your own security team runs a vendor review, confirm which certifications it actually requires before ruling a provider out on this column alone. | ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II are the two most-requested audits in an EOR vendor review. Ask for the report, not just the badge. |
| Service model and human support access | Ask who handles a contested termination: a dedicated expert team or an anonymous ticket queue. | Check whether real support access is gated behind a higher plan. Remote has strong customer-success scores. Multiplier is praised for responsive support. Teamed includes real HR and legal expert access at every tier. | You want a real person at the hard moments, not a bot wall. Teamed is rated 4.8 on G2. Remote has strong customer-success scores. Multiplier is well-reviewed for support responsiveness. | A dedicated contact and clear escalation path beat a rotating ticket queue for incident response. |
Decision checklist
- Read the small print before you sign. Most EORs require a deposit and many layer on setup, offboarding, minimum-term, no-exit, termination or admin fees. Teamed takes a one-month refundable deposit, charges no onboarding or offboarding fees (an early-exit fee may apply if you leave within 3 months, set out in your contract), and sets the costs out up front.
- Choose Remote if owned-entity compliance depth in your core markets matters most, you want a polished self-serve product with mature benefits and IP tooling, current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certification, and you can make the annual commitment for the $599 rate.
- Choose Multiplier if you want a modern, certified platform, fast onboarding in days, and the lowest published base in this comparison, and you will pin down the FX fee in writing before signing.
- Choose Teamed if you want the real FX shown and absorbed on every invoice, a real HR or legal expert at any support tier with no AI bot wall, and a partner that models the move to your own entity before you need to ask.
- Get the FX in writing from Multiplier before comparing it to Remote or Teamed. The base headline looks attractive. The salary-conversion cost is where the real comparison lives.
- Ask every provider the same question: can I reach a real HR or legal expert when something goes wrong, or does it go to a queue? The answer tells you more than the pricing page.
- Ask for the current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certificate and audit date if your procurement process needs one in hand now. Remote and Multiplier can provide it today. Teamed's accreditation is in progress.
Honest take
When Remote or Multiplier is the better fit.
- Choose Remote if you want owned entities in your core markets, a polished self-serve product with strong benefits and IP, current security certifications, and you can commit to annual billing for the $599 rate.
- Choose Remote over Teamed if you want a product-led experience rather than an advisory relationship, prefer a larger G2 review base, or need a certified security posture today.
- Choose Multiplier if you want a modern, certified platform, onboarding in days, and a lower published base, and you have confirmed the FX fee in writing.
- Choose Multiplier over Teamed if speed to first payroll or a certified security posture is the top priority and you have a single country or a small headcount where advisory depth is less critical.
Teamed leads employment intelligence and the lifecycle to entity, and ties Remote on pricing transparency. It concedes platform to Multiplier and security to both rivals here. A buyer with different priorities should pick differently. We'd rather lose the deal than mismatch the engagement.
Frequently asked questions
Remote vs Multiplier: which is better?
Neither is universally better. Remote leads on compliance and entity coverage, with entities in 90+ core markets, and discloses its FX approach. Multiplier leads on platform and self-serve, with the fastest onboarding in this comparison and a lower base from around $400. Both hold current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications. Remote's FX is a variable spread above mid-market. Multiplier's currency-conversion fee is not disclosed upfront. For a team that wants the truth about cost alongside ongoing employment intelligence and a managed path to its own entity, Teamed is the alternative to score.Does Remote or Multiplier own its entities?
Both use a mix of owned entities and local partners. Remote is owned-entity led in its core 90+ countries, which means one accountable employer for payroll and statutory contributions without a partner layer in those markets. Local partners extend the map to roughly 180 countries. Multiplier covers about 180 countries through a mix that leans more on local partners, with some owned entities. Every EOR in this category, including Teamed, delivers through this kind of mix. Ask each provider directly whether your specific country is owned or partner-served.Is Multiplier cheaper than Remote?
Multiplier's published base starts from around $400, lower than Remote's $599 headline on annual billing. But the real cost comparison is in the FX line. Remote discloses a variable spread above mid-market. Multiplier's currency-conversion fee is not published upfront, and third-party reviews report a spread that can run high. Get the FX in writing from both before comparing them. Teamed matches Remote's $599 headline and absorbs FX at zero markup, with the applied rate shown against the mid-market reference.Which has better support, Remote or Multiplier?
Both are well-reviewed for support. Remote consistently receives strong customer-success scores and is praised for a polished onboarding experience. Multiplier is praised for responsive support and its 4.7 G2 rating across roughly 1,300 reviews reflects broad satisfaction. Teamed's real HR and legal expert access is included at every tier with no AI bot wall or ticket queue, which is the employment intelligence column this page scores separately.Do Remote or Multiplier hold security certifications?
Yes. Both Remote and Multiplier hold current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications, checked 22 July 2026. That makes them the two providers on this page a procurement or security review can clear fastest on paper. Teamed is ISO 27001 and SOC 2 aligned, with accreditation in progress rather than the certificate in hand today. If your review needs the badge issued now, ask each provider for its current audit report and date.Who should use Teamed instead of Remote or Multiplier?
Teamed suits a rapidly growing company with an international footprint that wants three things: the real FX shown on every invoice, a real HR or legal expert at any support tier with no bot wall, and a clear model for when EOR stops being the right answer. It's lighter on self-serve platform depth than Remote or Multiplier, and it doesn't hold Remote's or Multiplier's current security certifications today. The advisory relationship is the argument for it, not the dashboard.How current is this comparison, and how was it scored?
Remote pricing was verified on 9 June 2026. Multiplier pricing was verified on 9 June 2026 via g2.com. Teamed pricing was verified on 16 June 2026. G2 ratings came from g2.com on 9 June 2026. Security certifications were checked against each provider on 22 July 2026. Each of the three providers is scored 1 to 5 on six criteria with no weighted total and no overall winner. We review the page quarterly and re-verify pricing monthly.
Common questions
Remote vs Multiplier, which global EOR platform should I choose?
It depends on your priorities. Remote leads compliance and entity coverage in its core 90+ markets and discloses its FX approach (a variable spread above mid-market). Multiplier leads platform and self-serve with the fastest onboarding and publishes a lower base from around $400, but its FX fee isn't disclosed upfront. Both hold current security certifications. Teamed ties Remote's pricing transparency at $599, absorbs FX at zero markup with the rate shown, and adds real HR and legal expert access at any tier. Choose Remote for entity depth, Multiplier for speed and a lower base, or Teamed for employment intelligence and lifecycle advisory.What is the difference between Remote and Multiplier?
Remote and Multiplier both reach roughly 180 countries and both hold current security certifications. Key differences: Remote is owned-entity led in 90+ core markets, Multiplier leans on local partners. Remote discloses a variable FX rate, Multiplier doesn't publish its FX fee upfront. Remote headlines at $599 on annual billing, Multiplier starts from around $400. Remote leads compliance and coverage, Multiplier leads platform and self-serve.
For the buying committee
Share with your team
Send this page to legal, finance, or HR for review. They will see the same statutory data and source citations you did.
The honest path
Want this scored for your countries?
Tell us your headcount and where you're hiring. A real HR or legal expert sends back a quote and a like-for-like breakdown. No demo, no deck.
