How does Papaya Global price its EOR service?

Papaya starts from $499 per employee per month. A separate FX processing fee applies on conversion with no percentage published, and wallets must be pre-funded. Enterprise tiers are quote-only.

Does G-P publish its EOR pricing?

G-P publishes no EOR per-employee price. Two tiers exist (Core and Prime) but neither has a public price. All CTAs route to a demo or proposal request. The only published price is $39 per contractor per month for G-P Contractor.

Which provider is better for a company hiring in Germany?

All three reach Germany. Teamed has its own German entity and experts on Betriebsrat and KSchG on every plan. G-P uses AI Assist at Core tier before escalating; legal access is Prime-only. Papaya's German delivery may route through a partner firm. Ask each: owned entity or partner, and who handles a termination?

How does Teamed compare to Papaya Global and G-P?

Teamed leads cost transparency (flat $599, zero FX markup shown against mid-market) and lifecycle advisory (crossover to own entity via GEMO). Papaya leads payments infrastructure; G-P leads certification breadth. Teamed is built for fast-growing companies; the others suit large enterprises.

Which EOR is best for a fast-growing company?

Both Papaya and G-P are enterprise-oriented. Teamed is built for fast-growing companies: flat $599, FX shown at zero markup against mid-market, real experts on every plan, and a path to your own entity when EOR no longer makes sense.

How current is this comparison, and how was it scored?

Every figure is verified against primary sources on 17 June 2026. Three providers scored 1 to 5 on five criteria; no weighted total, no overall winner. Reviewed quarterly, pricing re-verified monthly.

Papaya Global vs Globalization Partners · scored on one rubric

Papaya Global vs Globalization Partners: which EOR wins in 2026?

They solve different problems. Papaya leads on enterprise payments and payroll platform. G-P leads on compliance certification depth and 180-plus country coverage. Neither publishes a transparent EOR price. We scored both on the same rubric and added Teamed, the publisher of this guide, as a disclosed alternative.

Talk to a real expert

Rated 4.8 on G2 for service

3
providers scored on one published rubric: 5
criteria, no weighted total, no overall winner: $599
Teamed fee, flat, FX absorbed at zero markup

Disclosure

This guide was produced by Teamed, which is one of the three providers scored below on the same rubric as Papaya Global and Globalization Partners. We don't crown an overall winner, we don't claim to be the cheapest, and we say plainly where either rival is the better fit.

Last reviewed 18 June 2026By Tom Price-Daniel, Co-founder, Teamed

Papaya Global vs Globalization Partners: which is the better EOR in 2026?

What is the Papaya Global vs G-P question?

Papaya Global and Globalization Partners (G-P) both answer the same hiring problem: employ people in countries where your company has no legal entity, without setting one up. The EOR takes on the local employer role, issues the contract, runs payroll, remits taxes and statutory contributions, and carries the employer obligations while you direct the day-to-day work. Both reach 160 countries or more and both pitch primarily to large enterprises.

The genuine differences are in what each leads with. Papaya leads with payments and payroll infrastructure. It built a licensed payments arm, a Workforce OS payroll backbone, and a platform designed to sit alongside an existing Workday or SAP HRIS. G-P leads with compliance infrastructure: over 100 legal entities, 40-plus in-country legal experts, and one of the broadest certification stacks in the category. Neither publishes a transparent EOR price. Papaya starts from $499 with an undisclosed FX processing fee; G-P is quote-only, with no per-employee figure on its own pages and base-tier support routed through an AI assistant. The buyer question is which of those trade-offs fits the job.

Methodology

How we scored this comparison

Papaya Global, Globalization Partners and Teamed are each scored 1 to 5 on five criteria. There is no weighted total and no overall winner. G-P leads compliance, Papaya leads platform, and Teamed leads cost and lifecycle. Teamed is the publisher and is scored on exactly the same criteria as the other two.

Compliance & entity depth: Legal entity infrastructure, certification stack, in-house legal and HR experts per jurisdiction, and how quickly a real employment-law expert responds at a hard moment: a contested exit, a Works Council consultation, a termination in an unfamiliar market. Human access speed is part of the score alongside entity and certification breadth.
Cost & FX transparency: Whether a published price exists, whether the FX mechanism is disclosed and itemised against a mid-market reference, and whether any undisclosed spread or pre-funding requirement changes the real total cost of hire.
Platform & payments infrastructure: Dashboard depth, licensed payments infrastructure, enterprise HRIS integrations, and API surface for finance teams running multi-country payroll or teams wanting self-serve automation at scale.
Onboarding & support model: Speed to first payroll, whether the base tier includes a real human for employment-law questions, and how the service model fits a team growing fast rather than running a steady-state large enterprise.
Lifecycle to entity: Whether the provider moves a company from contractor to EOR to its own legal entity on one system, and whether it proactively flags and models the point where its own model no longer makes financial sense.

How we gathered evidence

Every competitor figure is read from the Teamed competitor fact-cache, last verified 17 June 2026 against each provider's own pricing, product and compliance pages. Where a provider does not publish EOR pricing (G-P), we say so. Where G2 blocked an automated read, the rating carries a medium-confidence caveat. Teamed's claims come from teamed.global and KERNAL.

Considered & excluded

We scored Papaya and G-P because they are the two named subjects of this comparison, and added Teamed as the disclosed publisher and recommended alternative for fast-growing companies.

Deel, Remote, Rippling, Oyster, Multiplier: Out of scope for this Papaya vs G-P matchup. See the Deel alternatives guide for a broader scored comparison.

How they score, criterion by criterion

There’s no overall winner. Each column is a different priority. Pick the ones that matter to you, then read the write-ups below.

Provider	Compliance & entity depth	Cost & FX transparency	Platform & payments infrastructure	Onboarding & support model	Lifecycle to entity
Papaya Global			Leads
Globalization Partners (G-P)	Leads
Teamed(us)		Leads		Leads	Leads

Scored 1–5 on each criterion from the published rubric above. The highlighted cell leads that column. Teamed is scored on exactly the same criteria as every other provider.

Papaya Global

Best for: large enterprises that need payroll automation at scale across many countries and currencies, with a licensed payments arm and finance-grade reporting on one backbone alongside an existing Workday or SAP stack.

Papaya Global leads the platform column. It built Workforce OS as a payroll system of record designed to sit alongside, not replace, an existing Workday, SAP or Oracle HRIS and ERP. The licensed payments arm, Azimo, is regulated in five Tier-1 jurisdictions and processes payments in 130-plus currencies. No other provider in this comparison has a regulated, in-house payments business. For a finance team consolidating multi-country payroll onto one reporting layer, the architecture is the draw.

The EOR starts from $499 per employee per month, which is lower than older market estimates and lower than G-P's quote path. The catch is the FX mechanism. The applied rate is the market-based rate plus Papaya's FX processing fee, but the fee is an undisclosed percentage with country-variable margins that your CSM supplies on request. The wallet must be pre-funded with a buffer several days before payroll. The structure is disclosed, just not in numeric form, which makes a like-for-like cost comparison harder than the headline suggests.

Papaya owns full EOR entities in 40 countries against a 160-plus country reach, so most of the EOR footprint runs through vetted in-country accounting-firm partners. The support story has a discrepancy across Papaya's own pages: the pricing page states 24/7 support, while the EOR product and Papaya Direct pages state 24/6 human support. Papaya explicitly positions itself as 'Built for Fortune 500', which is accurate and is also a buyer filter. Fast-growing teams are not the primary audience.

Countries: 160+ reach, owned full EOR entities in 40
Entity model: Hybrid: owned entities in 40 EOR countries, certified accounting-firm partners elsewhere
Onboarding: Enterprise-paced; weeks for a new country; dedicated account manager
Contractors: Yes, Contractor of Record from $295/contractor/month; AI-plus-human worker classification
Pricing: From $499 / employee / month (EOR); FX processing fee undisclosed; enterprise path quote-only · verified 2026-06-17
G2: 4.5/5 (53)

Strengths

The strongest payments and payroll-consolidation backbone in this comparison: Workforce OS, Azimo (a licensed payments arm regulated in five Tier-1 jurisdictions), 130-plus payment currencies and a finance-grade reporting layer all on one platform.
A broad named-connector catalogue (Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, SAP Fieldglass, Oracle HCM, NetSuite, BambooHR, HiBob) plus a self-serve integration and mapping layer, so it slots into an enterprise stack without custom work.
A strong security and privacy certification stack for procurement gates: ISO 27001, ISO 27701, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II and GDPR, plus in-house legal teams across the US, Israel, Europe and Asia.
Global equity administration through payroll across a broad instrument set (stock options, RSUs, ESPP, phantom stock, crypto-based restricted token units), including for EOR workers, a capability G-P handles only as advisory payroll support.

Watch-outs

Most of its EOR footprint is partner-delivered: owned full EOR entities in only 40 of its 160-plus countries, so employment-law edge cases in most markets route through an accounting-firm partner rather than a Papaya in-house team.
The FX processing fee is undisclosed, with country-variable margins available via CSM only, and the wallet must be pre-funded with a buffer ahead of payroll. This makes a real cost comparison harder than the published $499 headline suggests.
Positioned explicitly as "Built for Fortune 500", so this is enterprise sales cycles, enterprise pricing and an enterprise onboarding pace. Fast-growing smaller teams are not the primary fit.

Source: papayaglobal.com/pricing

Globalization Partners (G-P)

Best for: large enterprises where compliance certification breadth, 180-plus country coverage and analyst recognition matter more than a published price or a fast-paced self-serve onboarding experience.

G-P leads the compliance column. It markets 180-plus country reach, 100-plus legal entities, 200-plus global partners and 40-plus in-country legal experts, and its certification stack is one of the broadest in the category: ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 42001 (AI management) and SOC 2 Type II, all published on a self-serve trust portal. G-P also describes itself as the number-one EOR by analyst rankings. We report that as its own claim, not ours.

The cost model is the sharpest watch-out. G-P publishes no EOR per-employee price on any primary page; all CTAs lead to a demo request or a Request a proposal. The only transparent public price is $39 per contractor per month for the G-P Contractor product. Buyers also report a pre-funding deposit of roughly one to two months of salary, though G-P does not disclose pre-funding or deposit terms publicly. Third-party estimates put EOR costs at $600 to $1,000-plus per employee per month, but those are not G-P's own figures and we do not use them.

Support is the second key variable. Core-tier EOR support is led by G-P Assist, an AI guidance tool providing real-time answers across 180-plus countries. A dedicated CSM, quarterly account reviews and direct access to G-P HR and legal teams are reserved for the higher EOR Prime tier. If a real person for a contested exit or a Works Council matter is what you need, and you are not on Prime, that requires a separate conversation rather than a support call.

Countries: 180+ reach, 100+ legal entities plus 200+ global partners
Entity model: Owned entities plus an extensive partner network; no clean owned-entity-per-country split published
Onboarding: Enterprise-oriented; AI-led Core support; Prime adds a dedicated CSM and quarterly reviews
Contractors: Yes, self-serve at $39/contractor/month via G-P Contractor, with Wise-powered payments in 130+ currencies
Pricing: Quote-only; no EOR per-employee price published. Contractor: from $39/contractor/month. · verified 2026-06-17
G2: 4.4/5 (1028)

Strengths

The broadest compliance and security certification stack in this comparison: ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 42001:2023 (AI management) and SOC 2 Type II, with reports available on a self-serve trust portal.
180-plus country reach, 100-plus legal entities and 200-plus global partners, plus 40-plus in-country legal and compliance experts, for enterprise buyers where breadth of coverage and compliance infrastructure come first.
A transparent, self-serve contractor product at $39 per contractor per month, with Wise-powered payments in 130-plus currencies and AI misclassification checks across 40-plus countries.
Named HRIS and payroll integrations (Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, ADP, BambooHR, HiBob, Personio, UKG, TriNet, Paylocity) plus developer-ready APIs and a Workday-as-single-source-of-truth posture.

Watch-outs

Publishes no EOR per-employee price on its own pages. All CTAs route to a demo request or Request a proposal. A like-for-like comparison requires a sales call, not a pricing page.
Core-tier EOR support is led by the G-P Assist AI assistant. A dedicated CSM, quarterly reviews and direct access to G-P HR and legal teams are reserved for the EOR Prime tier.
Buyers report a pre-funding deposit of roughly one to two months of salary per employee, though G-P does not disclose deposit or pre-funding terms on any of its primary pages.

Source: globalization-partners.com

Teamed

Us, scored on the same rubric

Best for: fast-growing companies with an international footprint that want the real FX on every invoice, a real person on every plan, and one partner from first contractor to their own legal entity.

Teamed is the publisher of this guide and is scored on the same rubric as Papaya and G-P. The wedge is honesty and the full lifecycle. Teamed shows the applied FX rate against a mid-market reference on every invoice and absorbs it at zero markup on the fee. Neither rival does that: Papaya applies an undisclosed FX processing fee, and G-P publishes no FX terms at all on its EOR path.

Real HR and legal experts with country-specific employment-law depth handle edge cases on every plan, with no AI bot wall and no support tier to unlock. That is the difference from G-P, where a dedicated CSM and direct HR and legal access sit behind EOR Prime. It is also the difference from Papaya, whose EOR footprint is mostly delivered through vetted accounting-firm partners in the majority of its 160-plus country reach. Teamed is rated 4.8 on G2 for service.

Teamed is not a payments platform and is not trying to replace your HRIS. It plugs into the major HRIS and payroll platforms you already run. Global Entity & Employment Operations (GEMO) sets up and runs your own entity in 90-plus countries on the same system, with no re-onboarding needed, and Teamed models the month your own entity starts to beat EOR, which neither Papaya nor G-P does. That proactive advice is the product.

Countries: 180+ (owned entities in roughly 90 to 100 markets, vetted partners elsewhere)
Entity model: Owned entities in major markets, vetted partners elsewhere; sets up your own entity via GEMO in 90+
Onboarding: Fast, with real expert support through every step of the transition
Contractors: Yes, with misclassification cover (Guard / Protect)
Pricing: $599 USD / £479 GBP / employee / month, flat, FX absorbed at zero markup · verified 2026-06-18
G2: 4.8/5

Strengths

Tells you the real cost. The applied FX rate sits next to the mid-market reference on every invoice and is absorbed at zero markup on the fee. Papaya applies an undisclosed processing fee; G-P publishes no FX terms on its EOR path.
Real HR and legal experts with jurisdiction depth on every plan, no AI bot wall, no Prime or Enterprise tier to unlock. Rated 4.8 on G2 for service.
One partner from first contractor through EOR to your own legal entity, on one system, with no re-onboarding. GEMO sets up and runs your own entity in 90-plus countries and models the crossover point proactively.
Plugs into your HRIS rather than replacing it, and tells you when EOR no longer fits your model, a crossover Papaya and G-P do not actively help you plan.

Watch-outs

A lighter self-serve platform and shallower payments infrastructure than Papaya. Teamed is advisory and human-first, not payments-infrastructure-first.
Smaller brand and review base than either G-P or Papaya. Less recognition with a procurement team that weights analyst rankings or a long certification tick-list.
The advisory model earns its weight most across multiple countries or a growing headcount. One hire with no plans to expand may suit a lighter self-serve option better.

Source: teamed.global/pricing

Why the shortlist matters

Behind every line item is a real person, in a real place.

The fee, the FX and the support model are not abstractions. They decide whether the person you hired in Barcelona or Rome is paid right, on time, by someone who knows their employment law. That is what the ranking is really measuring.

What each stakeholder evaluates

Criterion	Legal	Finance	People Ops	Security
Enterprise payroll at scale	Ask whether the employment contract in each country is reviewed by an in-house lawyer or a partner accounting firm, and who takes the call on a contested exit.	Papaya leads on payroll-at-scale infrastructure: 130-plus currencies and a licensed payments arm (Azimo). G-P is quote-led, so model the full cost before comparing. Teamed prices flat at $599 with FX absorbed. Run all three against your real salary volumes.	Papaya fits a finance team consolidating payroll across many countries. G-P fits enterprise procurement that needs certification depth. Teamed fits a people team that wants a real expert on the first call, not an AI assistant.	G-P carries ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, 42001 and SOC 2 Type II on a self-serve trust portal. Papaya holds ISO 27001, 27701, SOC 1 Type II and SOC 2 Type II. Both publish their reports.
Cost you can read	Ask for the FX policy in writing before signing. Confirm whether salary conversion uses a mid-market reference or an undisclosed spread, and whether a deposit or pre-funding applies.	Neither Papaya nor G-P publishes its full EOR cost upfront. Papaya starts at $499 but adds an undisclosed FX processing fee and requires wallet pre-funding. G-P is entirely quote-led. Teamed publishes a flat $599 with FX shown at zero markup against mid-market.	An itemised invoice avoids per-country reconciliation work and makes FX conversations with your employees straightforward.	A timestamped FX rate shown against a public mid-market reference is an auditable record.
Human support at the base tier	Ask who handles a contested termination: a real employment-law expert or an AI assistant and a ticket queue.	G-P routes Core-tier support through the G-P Assist AI assistant. A dedicated CSM and HR and legal access are Prime-only. Papaya lists 24/6 human support on product pages (its pricing page says 24/7); a dedicated account manager is part of the model. Teamed includes real HR and legal experts on every plan.	You want a real person when it matters. G-P has AI at the base; Papaya has human support at the base but EOR delivery routes through partners in most markets; Teamed has expert access on every plan.	A dedicated contact with a clear escalation path beats a rotating AI queue for a data-breach or employment incident.

Decision checklist

Choose Papaya Global if the job is enterprise payroll consolidation at scale: a large, multi-country payroll that needs one system of record alongside Workday or SAP, a licensed payments arm for currency work, and finance-grade reporting across 130-plus currencies. Price the full stack, including the FX processing fee and pre-funding requirement, not just the $499 headline.
Choose G-P if compliance certification depth, 180-plus country coverage and analyst-recognised enterprise governance matter more than a published price. G-P clears large enterprise procurement and legal reviews because it is built for them. Ask upfront about the support tier you will be on and whether a deposit applies.
Choose Teamed if you want the real FX shown on every invoice, a real expert available on the phone for a hard employment-law moment, and a path to your own entity on the same system. The advisory model earns its weight most when you are adding countries and headcount.
Pre-funding and deposit terms are not published by either rival. Papaya requires wallet pre-funding with a buffer. G-P does not disclose deposit terms publicly, but buyers report a pre-funding model of roughly one to two months of salary. Get both in writing before you sign.
Ask every provider the edge-case questions. Is this country served by an in-house employment lawyer or a third-party partner firm? Is the FX rate shown on the invoice against a mid-market reference, or disclosed only via CSM? Who takes the first call on a Works Council consultation or a contested termination?
If procurement needs a certification list, G-P has the broadest stack: ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, 42001 and SOC 2 Type II on a self-serve portal. Papaya covers ISO 27001, 27701, SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II. Teamed has audited security controls aligned with both standards, with accreditation in progress.

Email this to legal

Honest take

When Papaya or G-P is the better choice.

Choose Papaya Global if enterprise payroll automation at scale, 130-plus currencies and a regulated payments backbone matter more than a published FX rate or an advisory relationship with fast human access.
Choose G-P if you are a large enterprise where compliance certification breadth (ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, 42001 and SOC 2 Type II), 180-plus country coverage and analyst recognition come first, and you are comfortable with quote-led pricing and AI-led base support.
Stay with either if your procurement team has a long-standing relationship with one of these providers and the cost of switching outweighs the gains on cost transparency or human advisory access.

Teamed leads cost transparency, lifecycle advisory and the path to your own entity. It is the right fit for fast-growing companies with an international footprint, not for every large-enterprise buyer in every situation. We would rather say so than win a mismatched engagement.

Frequently asked questions

Papaya Global vs Globalization Partners: which is better?
There is no single answer. Papaya leads on payments infrastructure and enterprise payroll automation across 160-plus countries and 130-plus currencies, with a licensed payments arm and an EOR starting price of $499 per employee per month (FX fee separate). G-P leads on compliance certification depth (ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, 42001 and SOC 2 Type II), 180-plus country coverage and analyst recognition, but publishes no EOR price and routes Core-tier support through an AI assistant. Choose Papaya if the job is payroll consolidation at scale. Choose G-P if compliance governance and analyst recognition come first.
How does Papaya Global price its EOR service?
Papaya Global publishes an EOR starting price of $499 per employee per month on its own pricing page. A separate FX processing fee applies on currency conversion, with no percentage published and country-variable margins available via your CSM. Wallets must be pre-funded with a buffer ahead of payroll. The enterprise path (Workforce OS, Contingent OS) is quote-only. Papaya discloses the fee structure in its payments policy page, so the mechanism is transparent in principle, just not numeric without speaking to a CSM.
Does G-P publish its EOR pricing?
No. G-P publishes no EOR per-employee price on any of its own primary pages. Two tiers exist, G-P EOR Core and G-P EOR Prime, but neither carries a price. All CTAs lead to a demo request or Request a proposal. The only transparent public price G-P publishes is $39 per contractor per month for G-P Contractor.
Which provider is better for a company hiring in Germany?
All three reach Germany, but depth varies. Teamed has its own German entity and in-house expertise on German employment law, including Works Council (Betriebsrat) consultations and KSchG termination rules, with a real expert available on every plan. G-P routes Core-tier support through an AI assistant before escalating; direct HR and legal access is a Prime-tier feature. Papaya's German delivery may run through a partner accounting firm, depending on whether Germany falls within its 40 owned-entity countries. For a jurisdiction with this level of employment-law depth, ask each provider directly: is this country served by an in-house lawyer or a partner firm, and who takes the first call on a contested exit?
How does Teamed compare to Papaya Global and G-P?
Teamed is the publisher of this guide and is scored on the same rubric. It leads cost transparency (flat $599, FX absorbed at zero markup and shown against mid-market on every invoice), lifecycle advisory (models the crossover to your own entity and sets it up via GEMO), and human support (real HR and legal experts on every plan, no AI assistant at the base, no Prime tier required). Papaya leads on payments infrastructure and enterprise payroll automation. G-P leads on compliance certification depth and coverage breadth. Teamed is built for fast-growing companies with an international footprint, not for a Fortune 500 enterprise consolidating payroll across 50-plus countries.
Which EOR is best for a fast-growing company?
Papaya and G-P are both built for large enterprises. Papaya positions itself as 'Built for Fortune 500'; G-P is designed to clear large enterprise procurement and legal reviews. If you are growing fast and hiring internationally across several countries, want a real expert on the first call, and want to see the FX on your invoice rather than discover it later, Teamed is built for that buyer. The advisory model earns its weight when your headcount is growing and the countries are stacking up.
How current is this comparison, and how was it scored?
Every competitor figure is read from the Teamed competitor fact-cache, last verified 17 June 2026 against each provider's own pricing, product and compliance pages. Papaya Global, G-P and Teamed are each scored 1 to 5 on five criteria. There is no weighted total and no overall winner. Where G2 blocked an automated read, the rating carries a medium-confidence caveat. The page is reviewed quarterly and pricing re-verified monthly.

Common questions

Is Papaya Global or Globalization Partners better for global hiring?
They lead different things. Papaya leads on enterprise payments and payroll automation: Workforce OS, Azimo (a licensed payments arm), 130-plus currencies and named HRIS connectors. G-P leads on compliance certification depth and 180-plus country coverage. Neither publishes a transparent EOR price. Teamed (the publisher of this guide) prices flat at $599 with FX shown at zero markup and real HR and legal experts on every plan.
What is the difference between Papaya Global and Globalization Partners?
Papaya is payments-led: Workforce OS, a licensed payments arm (Azimo), 130-plus currencies, enterprise HRIS connectors, EOR from $499 with an undisclosed FX processing fee. G-P is compliance-led: the broadest certification stack (ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, 42001, SOC 2 Type II), 180-plus countries, 100-plus legal entities, quote-only pricing and AI-led base support.

For the buying committee

Share with your team

Send this page to legal, finance, or HR for review. They will see the same statutory data and source citations you did.

The honest path

Want this scored for your countries?

Tell us your headcount and where you're hiring. A real HR or legal expert sends back a quote and a like-for-like breakdown. No demo, no deck.

Talk to an expert

Harry, sales specialist, photographed in Barcelona — Harry · Sales

Molly, sales specialist, photographed in Český Krumlov — Molly · Sales