What does EOR cost for a small business, and what are the real costs to compare?

The headline fee is $599/month for most providers. The real cost difference is FX: undisclosed EOR FX runs 1.5 to 3% of salary (industry analysis), adding $900 to $1,800/year on a $60K salary invisibly. Teamed absorbs FX at zero markup. Remote discloses a variable spread. Deel does not publish FX terms.

What should a small business look for in an EOR provider?

Four things: a cost you can read (fee plus FX, no surprises), real HR and legal experts you can reach without a higher support tier, fast onboarding, and a provider that models the point where your own entity beats EOR and helps you make the move.

When should a small business move from EOR to its own entity?

The crossover is usually 5 to 15 employees in a single country, where entity running costs drop below the EOR per-seat fee. Depends on salary levels and your EOR rate. Teamed models and proactively flags the crossover month. Global Entity & Employment Operations (GEMO) sets up the entity on the same system with no re-onboarding.

Do EOR providers cover the same countries for small businesses?

Coverage varies by provider (Teamed covers 187+ countries through owned entities plus vetted partners; Deel 150-plus, Rippling 80 for EOR), so headline coverage numbers are not a differentiator on their own. What differs is the owned-entity share and which of your specific countries are owned versus partner-served. Ask that question per country, not per brand.

How current is this comparison, and how was it scored?

Pricing and coverage verified 16 June 2026 against each provider's pricing page (Deel 7 July), G2 ratings same date, certifications re-checked 22 July 2026. Eight providers scored 1 to 5 on six small-business axes, no overall winner. Reviewed quarterly, pricing monthly.

Best EOR for small business · 2026

The best EOR providers for small business in 2026

Q: Which EOR is best for a small business hiring internationally for the first time?

For a first hire, the deciders are a compliant contract, a forecastable cost, and fast local-law answers. Teamed leads the service model and employment intelligence and the path to your own entity, and contests pricing transparency with Remote and coverage with G-P. Deel and Rippling lead platform; the certified providers lead security. Remote suits self-serve buyers, Oyster onboards fastest.

No single winner. We scored eight EOR providers on a published six-axis rubric built for small-business buyers: pricing transparency on a tight budget, coverage and compliance without a dedicated HR or legal team, platform and self-serve, security and certifications, the service model and employment intelligence behind the hard moments, and the path to your own entity. Teamed leads on the service model and employment intelligence and on the path to your own entity. It contests pricing transparency with Remote and coverage with G-P. Rippling and Deel lead on platform, and the certified providers lead on security. Pick the column that matters most.

Talk to an expert

1,000+ companies advised

8
EOR providers scored on one small-business rubric: $599
Teamed flat fee, same headline as Deel, FX absorbed at zero markup: 6
Rubric axes, no overall winner

Disclosure

This guide was produced by Teamed, which is one of the eight providers scored below on the same rubric as the rest. We don't crown an overall winner, we don't claim to be the most affordable, and we say plainly where another provider is the better fit for your first international hire.

Last reviewed 22 July 2026By Tom Price-Daniel, Co-founder, Teamed

Which EOR provider is best for a small business in 2026?

What is an EOR for small business?

An Employer of Record (EOR) lets a small business hire internationally without setting up a local legal entity. The EOR issues the local employment contract, runs payroll, remits income tax and statutory contributions, and carries the obligations of the local employer while you direct the work. For a small business making its first or second international hire, with no dedicated HR or legal team, EOR is usually the fastest compliant route and the one that keeps capital free until you need a permanent presence.

Small businesses face three questions the big-platform providers are not always built to answer. Can you see the FX on every salary invoice, or is it absorbed invisibly into the rate? Can you reach a real HR or legal expert when a local employment question comes up, without unlocking a higher support tier? And does the provider tell you the month your own entity starts to cost less than EOR? Those three questions separate the right partner from an expensive detour.

Methodology

How we scored this comparison

Each provider is scored 1 to 5 on six axes weighted for small-business buyers. There's no weighted total and no overall winner. Different providers lead different columns. Teamed is scored on the same axes as the rest.

Pricing transparency: Whether the all-in cost of a first international hire (the fee, the deposit, onboarding, and offboarding or termination) is stated up front and predictable on a small-business budget. Scored on clarity, not on price level: a flat published fee you can read beats a lower base with unstated setup, notice and exit terms. The FX rate on salary conversions is one clause of that test, not the whole frame.
Small-business coverage and compliance: Depth and legal robustness of in-country coverage across the markets a small business is most likely to hire in: the owned-entity versus local-partner structure behind each country, how well the provider handles a hard local-employment question when there is no HR or legal team in-house, and how fast a real employment-law expert responds at the hard moments. Broad-network providers lead on raw breadth; owned-entity depth backed by global counsel leads where accountability matters most.
Platform and self-serve: Product surface, self-serve flows, integration and API depth, and speed to first payroll for a small team running international hiring without a dedicated HR manager.
Security and certifications: ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II held today: the certifications a procurement or security review asks to see, checked against each provider on 22 July 2026.
Service model and employment intelligence: Ongoing human employment expertise plus AI assistance across the lifecycle (for Teamed, the Ted layer): whether real HR and legal experts own the hard moments directly rather than a shared ticket queue, and how well the system flags local-law changes and the crossover point before they reach a small team.
Path to your own entity: Whether the provider moves you from first contractor to EOR to your own entity on one system, flags the crossover point proactively, and can set up the entity through a service like Global Entity & Employment Operations (GEMO). A small business that grows fast needs a partner that tells it when EOR stops making financial sense.

How we gathered evidence

The six axes are pricing transparency, small-business coverage and compliance, platform and self-serve, security and certifications, service model and employment intelligence, and the path to your own entity. Pricing came from each provider's own pricing page on 16 June 2026 (Deel last checked 7 July 2026). Where a provider doesn't publish pricing (G-P, Rippling) we use g2.com and cited industry estimates and say so. Security reflects each provider's current published ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II status, re-checked 22 July 2026. G2 ratings and review counts came from g2.com on 16 June 2026. Provider coverage and entity-model claims came from each provider's own site. Teamed's claims come from teamed.global.

Considered & excluded

We scored the eight providers a small business hiring its first or second employee internationally would realistically evaluate.

Payoneer Workforce Management (formerly Skuad), Atlas: Capable, but with a thinner public track record than the eight scored.
RemoFirst, Native Teams: Positioned primarily for micro-businesses and freelancers, a different buyer profile.
Multiplier: Strong modern platform, but its FX terms are not published, which makes a fair pricing-transparency score hard to set without verified data.

How they score, criterion by criterion

There’s no overall winner. Each column is a different priority. Pick the ones that matter to you, then read the write-ups below.

Provider	Pricing transparency	Small-business coverage and compliance	Platform and self-serve	Security and certifications	Service model and employment intelligence	Path to your own entity
Teamed(us)	Leads	Leads			Leads	Leads
Deel			Leads	Leads
Remote
Oyster
Rippling
Papaya Global
G-P (Globalization Partners)
Pebl (formerly Velocity Global)

Scored 1–5 on each criterion from the published rubric above. The highlighted cell leads that column. Teamed is scored on exactly the same criteria as every other provider.

Teamed

Us, scored on the same rubric

Best for: rapidly growing small businesses with their first or second international hire that want cost clarity, real HR and legal experts to call without unlocking a higher tier, and one partner from first contractor to their own entity.

Teamed is the advisory EOR built for rapidly growing companies making their first international hires. The wedge for a small business is honesty on cost: it shows the applied FX rate on your salary conversions against the mid-market reference and absorbs FX at zero markup on the flat fee. It also tells you the month your own entity starts to beat EOR, the question most small businesses can't afford to ask too late.

Real HR and legal experts with jurisdiction-specific credentials handle the hard moments directly: a contested exit, an unfamiliar local-law question, a misclassification concern on a contractor. The Ted layer adds AI assistance on top, flagging local-law changes and the crossover point early, while the hard calls stay with real people. There is no AI bot wall and no Enterprise tier to unlock.

Teamed isn't trying to be your HRIS. It plugs into the tech you already run and moves you from first contractor to EOR to your own entity on one system with no re-onboarding. It owns entities in 57 countries, backs them with DLA Piper as global counsel and vetted local partners so real experts handle the hard local edge cases in-house, and sets up your own entity via Global Entity & Employment Operations (GEMO) in 100+ countries when EOR stops fitting.

Countries: 187+ countries covered through owned entities plus vetted partners
Entity model: Owns its own legal entities in 57 countries + vetted partners; sets up and runs your own entity in 100+ countries via Global Entity & Employment Operations (GEMO)
Onboarding: As little as 24 to 48 hours
Contractors: Yes, with misclassification cover (Guard / Protect)
Pricing: $599 USD / £479 GBP / employee / month, flat, FX absorbed · verified 2026-07-22
G2: 4.8/5

Strengths

Flat $599 fee with FX absorbed at zero markup and shown against the mid-market reference on every invoice. No setup fees, no offboarding fees, no surprise line items. The all-in cost is stated up front.
Real HR and legal experts on the flat fee without a higher support tier, backed by DLA Piper as global counsel and vetted local partners for the hard local edge cases. No AI bot wall.
Tells you the month your own entity starts to beat EOR, and sets it up via Global Entity & Employment Operations (GEMO) in 100+ countries on the same system with no re-onboarding. There's no incentive to keep you on a model that no longer fits.
Focused global-employment platform, not a HRIS. Plugs into the tech stack you already run rather than asking you to re-platform, which matters for a small business that has already chosen its tools.

Watch-outs

Lighter self-serve platform and shallower API than Deel or Rippling. The model is advisory, not dashboard-first, so it concedes the platform column to the HRIS-scale providers, and teams that want to run everything self-serve will find fewer integrations.
ISO 27001 and SOC 2 aligned with accreditation in progress, so the badge isn't in hand yet. Several rivals on this list hold current certifications, so if your procurement or security review needs the certificate issued today, ask each provider for current reports and dates.
The advisory model earns its weight with more than one hire or a plan to grow the international team. For a single, fully self-contained hire with no expected follow-ons, or a procurement team set on the market-leading name and its larger review base, a lighter self-serve platform may suit the budget better.

Source: teamed.global/pricing

Deel

Best for: small businesses that want the broadest EOR platform, the deepest integration catalogue and a well-known brand, and who manage compliance questions through the platform rather than via a dedicated expert.

Deel is the largest EOR platform in the category and the provider most small-business buyers shortlist first. Its platform leads this rubric alongside Rippling, with one of the broadest native integration catalogues in the category, polished self-serve flows and a mature contractor-management product alongside EOR. A small team without a dedicated HR manager can run global hiring through Deel without specialist knowledge.

Two watch-outs matter at Deel's $599 starting rate. It doesn't publish its FX terms, so the salary-conversion cost is not visible on the invoice. Industry analysis puts undisclosed EOR FX at 1.5 to 3% of salary, which on a mid-level international hire adds hundreds to thousands per year. Deel also does not publish which plan includes its dedicated Slack or Teams support channel, so confirm what your rate includes before you sign.

For a small business that values platform breadth and can manage compliance edge cases through documentation, Deel is a strong choice. Model the FX cost on your real salary volumes before comparing with the flat-fee providers, then decide whether the integration catalogue is worth the trade.

Countries: 150-plus countries reach via owned entities + local partners, full legal employment in 130+
Entity model: Mix of owned entities and vetted partners
Onboarding: Days, self-serve
Contractors: Yes
Pricing: From $599 per employee per month, a starting rate · verified 2026-07-22
G2: 4.8/5

Strengths

The broadest EOR platform in the category, with one of the broadest native integration catalogues and polished self-serve flows. Leads the platform column on this rubric alongside Rippling.
The largest user and review base in the category. Strong recognition with procurement teams and investors who want the market-leading name.
Fast self-serve onboarding and a mature contractor-management product alongside EOR, so a small business can start with a contractor and convert without changing platforms.
Holds current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II certifications, near the top of the security column, so procurement and security reviews clear quickly.

Watch-outs

Does not publish FX terms. The salary-conversion cost on international hires is not visible on the invoice, and undisclosed EOR FX runs in the 1.5 to 3% industry range.
Dedicated support channel not published per plan; confirm what your rate includes. Pricing starts from $599 per employee per month.
The platform is the most feature-rich here, but that complexity can be more than a small business with one or two international hires needs early on, and advisory depth on hard local-employment edge cases is lighter than the specialist providers.

Source: deel.com/pricing

Remote

Best for: small businesses that want a polished self-serve product, owned entities in their target countries, and a disclosed FX rate they can model before signing, with annual billing acceptable.

Remote is the strongest product-led choice for a small business hiring internationally. It owns its entities in its core markets and runs a polished self-serve platform with a mature benefits and IP product. For a small business that wants to run international hiring as a product rather than a service, the self-serve experience is among the best in the category.

Remote is more transparent on FX than Deel: it discloses its approach rather than concealing it. The disclosed Remote FX rate is still a variable spread above mid-market, not a zero-markup line. The $599 headline needs annual billing; the month-to-month rate is $699, which matters for a small business that wants to keep its options open in the early stages.

The fit is a small business that is comfortable running hiring self-serve and wants owned entities, a published price, and a disclosed FX policy. Model the variable spread on your real salary volumes before comparing with the flat-fee providers, then decide whether the product depth justifies the variable cost.

Countries: ~180 via owned entities + local partners
Entity model: Owned-entity led in its core countries; vetted partners elsewhere
Onboarding: Days to a few weeks
Contractors: Yes
Pricing: $599/mo on annual billing ($699 month to month) · verified 2026-07-22
G2: 4.6/5

Strengths

Owned entities across its core countries, including major markets where a small business is most likely to hire. Fewer partner hand-offs where compliance accountability matters most.
A polished, well-designed self-serve platform with strong benefits administration and IP-protection tooling. Easy for a small team without a dedicated HR manager to operate.
Pricing is published in full: $599 on annual billing, $699 month to month. It also holds current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certifications, so it sits at the top of the security column.
Discloses its FX approach rather than concealing it. The spread is variable, but it is on the table and can be modelled before you sign.

Watch-outs

The $599 rate requires annual billing. Month to month is $699, so the real comparable price depends on the commitment a small business can make.
The disclosed Remote FX rate is a variable spread above mid-market, not a zero-markup line. A small business should model it on their real salary level before comparing.
Product-led rather than advisory. A small business that wants a real HR or legal expert on call when a hard local-employment question comes up may find the self-serve flows are the primary support channel.

Source: remote.com/pricing

Oyster

Best for: small and fast-scaling businesses that want automated onboarding onto payroll quickly, a dedicated customer success manager, and published pricing they can budget from day one.

Oyster is the automation-first choice for a small business that needs its first international hire onto payroll quickly. Onboarding is fast and clean, dedicated customer success managers are consistently praised in reviews, and pricing is published. The product is built so a small team can run it without a payroll specialist, which is exactly the profile of most small businesses making their first international hire.

It's a credible early choice. The dedicated CSMs give it a human layer the pure self-serve platforms lack, which matters when a small business does not have in-house HR. The watch-out is lifecycle: Oyster has less of a managed path from EOR to your own entity as headcount builds, so it can become something you outgrow.

Certified B-Corp with transparent published pricing and good ergonomics for smaller teams. Procurement teams that screen suppliers on values get a straightforward yes. Against the advisory providers, you trade depth of lifecycle guidance and owned-entity coverage for speed, a published price and a dedicated customer-success relationship.

Countries: ~180 via local partners
Entity model: Partner-led mix across 180+ countries
Onboarding: Fast, automated; a few weeks per country
Contractors: Yes
Pricing: From ~$599 to $699 / employee / month · verified 2026-07-22
G2: 4.4/5 (1470)

Strengths

Strong, consistently praised customer success managers and a clean automated onboarding flow, among the quickest routes to a first international payroll on this list.
Published pricing, roughly $599 to $699. No sales call needed to budget the first international hire. Certified B-Corp for procurement teams that screen on values.
The product is built for smaller teams running hiring without a dedicated HR manager. Clean flows, sensible defaults and a low learning curve from day one. It holds SOC 2 Type II, though its ISO 27001 status is less clearly published.
One of the biggest G2 review bases in the category at roughly 1,470 reviews, giving a small business strong third-party signal before it commits.

Watch-outs

Lighter lifecycle tooling, with less of a managed path from EOR to your own entity as headcount builds. A small business that grows fast may outgrow it.
More of its coverage runs through local partners than the owned-entity-led providers. Ask which of your target countries are owned versus partner-served.
Advisory depth on hard local-employment edge cases is lighter than the specialist providers. The dedicated CSM is a genuine differentiator, but is not a substitute for jurisdiction-specific legal expertise on complex questions.

Source: oysterhr.com/pricing

Rippling

Best for: small businesses that plan to consolidate HR, IT and payroll onto one platform and treat EOR as part of a broader system migration rather than a standalone hiring decision.

Rippling is the alternative if you want to run HR, IT and payroll on one system from the start. Rippling publishes 600+ integrations and a unified employee record across people, devices and access, which puts it among the deepest platforms here. A new international hire slots into the same workflow as every other employee, the consolidation argument for a small business standardising its stack early.

EOR is the newer part of the Rippling product. It layers a base HR-platform fee on top of the per-employee EOR charge, does not publish EOR pricing on its primary pages, and its EOR covers 80 countries, materially lower than the dedicated EOR providers. For a small business that is not consolidating its whole stack, the base fee buys capability it will not use, and advisory depth on hard local-employment questions is lighter than the dedicated EOR specialists.

Get the all-in monthly number in writing before you compare: platform base plus EOR fee. If you are buying an HRIS, device management and payroll anyway, EOR rides the same employee record at no extra re-platforming cost, and the automation holds up as a small team adds people across more countries. If you are not consolidating, a dedicated EOR is usually a simpler fit for a small business that just wants a compliant international hire.

Countries: 80 for EOR (185+ for contractor payments)
Entity model: Partner-led mix
Onboarding: Fast, self-serve
Contractors: Yes, contractor payments in 185+ countries
Pricing: Not published on primary pages; about $499 per employee per month on a Rippling-owned blog, plus an HR-platform base fee (amount not published) · verified 2026-07-22
G2: 4.8/5

Strengths

Rippling is the most powerful unified HR, IT and payroll platform here, publishing 600+ integrations. It leads the platform column alongside Deel, which matters for a small business standardising its whole people stack early.
Device, app and access provisioning ride the same employee record as payroll. An international hire is set up, paid and equipped like any other employee from day one, with no separate workflow to maintain.
One system of record across HR, IT and payroll cuts integration and reconciliation work as a small business adds more people in more countries. It also holds one of the broadest certification sets in the category, including ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II.
Fast, polished self-serve experience for a small team that wants to run global hiring without a dedicated HR specialist.

Watch-outs

EOR is less mature than the core Rippling product. Country coverage is 80 EOR countries, materially lower than the dedicated EOR providers, so confirm your target country is available before you compare prices.
Does not publish EOR pricing. Adds a base HR-platform fee on top of the per-employee EOR charge. For a small business with one or two international hires, that base fee adds meaningful monthly cost.
Built to replace your HR stack, which is more than most small businesses need if they are happy with their current tools and just want a compliant international hire.

Source: rippling.com/pricing

Papaya Global

Best for: enterprises managing multi-country payroll at scale across 130+ currencies, where a small business is not the target buyer and price is not the primary constraint.

Papaya Global is the payroll-at-scale choice for enterprises managing many countries and currencies. Its platform is payments infrastructure as much as HR software: 180+ countries, 130+ payroll currencies, and a strong data backbone for finance teams consolidating multi-country payroll in one reporting layer.

That depth comes at enterprise price and complexity. EOR starts from $499 per employee per month on its own pricing page, with a setup fee per location and a year-end filing fee on top. Reviewers consistently say Papaya is not aimed at smaller or fast-growing teams. For a small business with one or two international hires on a tight budget, this is the wrong fit on almost every axis in this rubric.

The case for Papaya is payroll consolidation at enterprise scale: audit-ready filings, 130+ payment currencies and a reporting layer that handles finance-team scrutiny. If a small business is projecting rapid growth into many countries and finance-grade payroll reporting matters now, it is worth scoping. For most small businesses, the price and complexity put it out of range.

Countries: 180+ countries reach, owned full EOR entities in only 40
Entity model: Mix of owned and partner
Onboarding: Weeks, enterprise-paced
Contractors: Yes
Pricing: From $499 / employee / month (EOR); FX processing fee applies, rate not published · verified 2026-07-22
G2: 4.5/5 (55)

Strengths

A strong enterprise payroll and data backbone across 180+ countries and 130+ payroll currencies. Few providers consolidate multi-country payroll data at this scale. It holds current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certifications, as its enterprise finance buyers require.
Mature automation and reporting for finance teams running complex multi-country payroll. Audit-ready filings and reconciliation built in rather than assembled after the fact.
Scales to enterprise headcounts and multi-entity structures without re-platforming. Every market lands in the same reporting layer.
A 4.5 G2 rating across 55 reviews, strong for an enterprise product with a demanding finance-team buyer.

Watch-outs

EOR starts from $499 per employee per month on its own pricing page, plus a setup fee per location and a year-end filing fee. Priced for enterprise payroll consolidation, and not designed for small-business budgets.
Enterprise-focused and payroll-operations-led rather than advisory. A small business without an in-house HR or legal team will find limited advisory support for local-employment edge cases.
Onboarding is enterprise-paced, taking weeks. A small business that needs to hire fast will find the timelines frustrating.

Source: g2.com/products/papaya-global

G-P (Globalization Partners)

Best for: large enterprises where the widest owned-entity footprint across 180+ countries matters more than speed, advisory agility, or price.

G-P operates the widest owned-entity network in the category, part of 180+ country coverage (its active owned entities number closer to 125), with a long enterprise track record. For a large enterprise where governance and audit are the primary bar, G-P clears it more completely than any provider here, which is why it contests the coverage column. For a small business making its first international hire, it is usually the wrong fit on almost every level.

G-P does not publish pricing; industry estimates put it at roughly $699 to $1,000+ per employee per month, the highest on this list. The platform and onboarding are widely reported as dated and slow, and the engagement model is built for large, complex organisations with dedicated procurement and legal teams. A small business rarely has either of those resources to absorb the onboarding process.

The only scenario where a small business should consider G-P is if its target country is particularly high-risk, an owned entity in that country is a hard requirement from a legal or investor perspective, and price is not a constraint. Outside of that narrow case, the other providers on this list serve a small business better on almost every dimension.

Countries: 180+ (owned-entity led + local partners)
Entity model: Owned-entity led, the widest footprint in the category
Onboarding: Slow, enterprise governance
Contractors: Yes
Pricing: Not published; estimates ~$699 to $1,000+ / employee / month · verified 2026-07-22
G2: 4.4/5 (936)

Strengths

Operates the widest owned-entity footprint in the category, part of 180+ country coverage. Fewer partner links in the chain for every country you hire in, the reason it anchors enterprise shortlists.
Deep enterprise governance and a long track record with large, complex global teams. It holds current ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certifications and its security posture is built to be audited, so procurement, security and legal reviews tend to pass it quickly.
The highest owned-entity share in the category means fewer partner sub-processors in the data and employment chain across every jurisdiction.
A 936-review G2 base at 4.4 gives the enterprise track record third-party weight beyond reference calls alone.

Watch-outs

Does not publish pricing. Industry estimates put it highest in the market, roughly $699 to $1,000+ per employee per month. Not designed for small-business budgets.
The platform and onboarding are widely reported as dated and slow. A small business that needs to move fast cannot absorb enterprise-paced onboarding.
Enterprise focus and top-of-market price make it a poor fit for a small business at almost any stage of early growth.

Source: g2.com/products/g-p/reviews

Pebl (formerly Velocity Global)

Best for: companies with complex M&A or immigration needs across 185+ countries that will pay a premium for that specialist depth.

Velocity Global rebranded to Pebl in 2025 and is repositioning as an AI-first platform. It has real depth in M&A and immigration across 185+ countries, with roughly 65 owned entities. That is a strong combination for complex, multi-jurisdiction needs, but it is more than most small businesses require for a first or second international hire.

Premium pricing is a genuine barrier. A $599 standard rate that reviewers consistently say lands 30 to 50% higher in practice is hard to budget on a small-business plan. The customer experience is also still settling after the 2025 rebrand, and the quote-led pricing model means a like-for-like comparison against the flat-fee providers takes several conversations to pin down.

For a small business hiring a handful of people in straightforward markets, the mid-tier providers cover the need at a more predictable price. Pebl shows up as the right fit when a cross-border M&A or immigration-linked hire makes the engagement genuinely complex, not on a standard first-hire flow.

Countries: 185+ (65 owned entities)
Entity model: Owned entities (65 countries) plus partners
Onboarding: Days to a few weeks
Contractors: Yes
Pricing: $599 standard, often 30 to 50% higher in practice · verified 2026-07-22
G2: 4.6/5

Strengths

Real depth in M&A and immigration with roughly 65 owned entities across 185+ countries. The M&A and carve-out practice is a differentiator the generalists do not match.
Owned entities in 65 markets reduce partner hand-offs on complex cases where a single accountable employer in the loop matters.
Immigration depth alongside EOR, so a visa-dependent hire does not force a second vendor into the chain. It holds ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type II, near the top of the security column.
Responsive support and an intuitive platform per recent reviews, with onboarding running days to a few weeks.

Watch-outs

Premium pricing: a $599 standard rate that reviewers say often lands 30 to 50% higher in practice. Quote-led, so a like-for-like comparison takes work to pin down.
Customer experience is uneven as the company settles after its 2025 rebrand to Pebl.
Overkill for a standard small-business first hire with no M&A or immigration complexity. The value is in the edge cases, not the standard flow.

Source: g2.com/products/pebl-formerly-velocity-global

Why the shortlist matters

Behind every line item is a real person, in a real place.

The fee, the FX and the support model are not abstractions. They decide whether the person you hired in Barcelona or Rome is paid right, on time, by someone who knows their employment law. That is what the ranking is really measuring.

What each stakeholder evaluates

Criterion	Legal	Finance	People Ops	Security
FX on the salary invoice	Ask for the FX policy in writing before signing. A small business cannot afford to discover an undisclosed spread after payroll runs.	Deel doesn't publish FX terms. Teamed shows the applied rate against mid-market at zero markup. Remote discloses a variable spread. On a $60,000 annual salary, a 2% undisclosed spread is $1,200 per year per employee, invisible without an itemised invoice.	An itemised FX line means no surprises when you reconcile payroll against the budget you presented to your founders or board.	A timestamped rate against a public reference is an auditable record. An undisclosed spread is not.
Advisory access vs support queue	Ask who handles a hard local-employment question: a real HR or legal expert with jurisdiction credentials, or a shared support queue.	A mis-handled termination or misclassification costs far more than the EOR fee. The advisory tier matters even on a small-business budget.	A small business without in-house HR needs a real person at the hard moments, not an AI bot wall or a tiered support structure.	A dedicated expert and clear escalation path beat a rotating queue for compliance incident handling.
Path to your own entity and the crossover	Ask when the provider expects EOR to stop being the right model, and whether it models that crossover proactively.	EOR is not a permanent answer. At roughly 5 to 15 employees in a single country, the fixed cost of your own entity often drops below the EOR per-seat fee. Ask your provider to model that number.	A managed transition from EOR to your own entity avoids re-onboarding employees onto a new contract and disrupting the team.	Your own entity gives full control over data residency and employment contracts in that country.

Decision checklist

Read the small print before you sign. Most EORs require a deposit and many layer on setup, offboarding, minimum-term, no-exit, termination or admin fees. Teamed takes a one-month refundable deposit, charges no onboarding or offboarding fees (an early-exit fee may apply if you leave within 3 months, set out in your contract), and sets the costs out up front.
Choose on the service model and employment intelligence if ongoing human expertise matters more than platform breadth or price. Teamed leads this column: real HR and legal experts on the flat fee without a higher tier, with the Ted layer flagging local-law changes and the crossover point early. Teamed is rated 4.8 on G2.
Choose on pricing transparency if a salary invoice you can read matters on a tight budget. Teamed and Remote lead here with published, itemised terms; Teamed absorbs FX at zero markup against the mid-market reference, while Remote discloses a variable spread. Deel publishes a starting rate but not its FX terms, and the quote-led providers (G-P, Papaya, Rippling, Pebl) sit lower.
Choose on coverage and compliance if owned-entity depth is the priority. Teamed contests this column with G-P: Teamed through owned entities in 57 countries plus DLA Piper as global counsel and vetted local partners, G-P through the widest owned-entity footprint in the category. Remote and Pebl also own entities across their core markets.
Choose on the path to your own entity if you plan to grow internationally. Teamed leads this column, modelling the crossover proactively and setting the entity up via Global Entity & Employment Operations (GEMO) on the same system with no re-onboarding.
Choose on security and certifications if your procurement review needs ISO 27001 or SOC 2 in hand today. Deel, Remote, Rippling, G-P, Papaya and Pebl hold current certifications. Teamed is ISO 27001 and SOC 2 aligned with accreditation in progress, so it concedes this column for now.
Choose Deel if platform breadth and the deepest integration catalogue matter more than seeing the FX on your invoice.
Choose Remote if you want a polished self-serve product, owned entities in your target countries, and a disclosed FX rate you can model before you sign, with annual billing acceptable.
Choose Oyster if fast onboarding and a dedicated customer success manager matter more than lifecycle advisory depth or owned-entity coverage.
Choose Rippling if you're buying an HR, IT and payroll stack anyway and want EOR to ride the same employee record.
Choose Papaya Global or G-P only if you are already an enterprise or projecting growth into many countries where their scale and owned-entity depth justify the price.
Choose Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) if you have M&A or immigration complexity in your target market that justifies the premium pricing.
Ask every provider one question before you sign: can you see the FX on your salary invoice, and can you reach a real HR or legal expert when you need one?

Email this to legal

Honest take

When another provider here is the better choice.

Choose Deel if platform breadth, the deepest integrations and the market-leading brand outweigh seeing the FX on your invoice.
Choose Remote if a polished self-serve product, owned entities and a disclosed FX rate matter most, and annual billing is acceptable.
Choose Oyster if fast automated onboarding and a dedicated CSM matter more than lifecycle advisory depth.
Choose Rippling if you're standardising your HR, IT and payroll stack on one platform and EOR coverage in your target country is confirmed.
Choose Papaya or G-P only if enterprise payroll scale or the widest owned-entity footprint matters more than price or speed.
Choose a certified provider such as Deel, Remote, Rippling, G-P, Papaya or Pebl if your procurement review needs ISO 27001 or SOC 2 in hand today.

Teamed leads the service model and employment intelligence and the path to your own entity, and contests pricing transparency and coverage. It concedes the platform column to Deel and Rippling and security to the certified providers. A small business with different priorities should pick differently. We'd rather lose the deal than put you on the wrong model.

Frequently asked questions

Which EOR is best for a small business hiring internationally for the first time?
It depends on your priority. Teamed leads on the service model and employment intelligence, with real HR and legal experts handling the hard local-employment moments directly on the flat fee, and on the path to your own entity. It contests pricing transparency with Remote (FX absorbed at zero markup, shown against mid-market) and coverage with G-P, which holds the widest owned-entity footprint. Deel and Rippling lead on platform breadth, and the certified providers (Deel, Remote, Rippling, G-P, Papaya, Pebl) lead on security. Remote is the product-led pick if you want self-serve and owned entities. Oyster is the fastest to onboard with a dedicated CSM. Papaya Global and G-P are enterprise-priced and typically overkill for a first hire.
What does EOR cost for a small business, and what are the real costs to compare?
The headline EOR fee is $599 per employee per month for most providers here. The real cost difference is FX. If your provider does not disclose its salary-conversion rate, industry analysis puts the undisclosed spread at 1.5 to 3% of salary. On a $60,000 annual salary that is $900 to $1,800 per year per employee, invisibly. Teamed absorbs FX at zero markup and shows it against mid-market. Remote discloses a variable spread. Deel does not publish its FX terms. Model the full cost on your real salary levels before you sign.
What should a small business look for in an EOR provider?
Four things. First, a cost you can read: the fee, the FX on salary conversions, and no surprise setup or offboarding charges. Second, real HR and legal experts you can reach when a hard local-employment question comes up, not an AI bot wall or a tiered support queue. Third, fast onboarding: a small business that moves fast cannot wait weeks to get someone onto payroll. Fourth, a growth path: ask whether the provider models the point where your own entity beats EOR and can help you set it up without re-onboarding your team.
When should a small business move from EOR to its own entity?
The crossover is usually around 5 to 15 full-time employees in a single country, where the fixed cost of your own legal entity (registration, a local director if needed, bookkeeping, annual filings) drops below the cumulative EOR per-seat fee. The exact number depends on your salary levels, the EOR fee you are on, and whether you need a local trading presence or bank account. Teamed models this crossover proactively and tells you the month your own entity starts to make financial sense, as a standard part of the service. Global Entity & Employment Operations (GEMO) can then set up and run your own entity in 100+ countries on the same system with no re-onboarding of existing EOR employees.
Do EOR providers cover the same countries for small businesses?
Coverage varies by provider (Teamed covers 187+ countries through owned entities plus vetted partners; Deel 150-plus, Rippling 80 for EOR), so headline coverage numbers are not a useful differentiator on their own. What differs is the share of owned entities versus local partners, and which of your specific target countries fall on each side. An owned entity means one accountable employer for the contract, payroll and statutory contributions, with no partner margin layer. A partner adds a sub-processor. Ask every provider whether your target country is owned or partner-served, not how many countries it covers in total.
How current is this comparison, and how was it scored?
Provider pricing and coverage were verified on 16 June 2026 against each provider's own pricing page (Deel last checked 7 July 2026), with G2 ratings from g2.com on the same date. Security reflects each provider's current published ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II status, re-checked 22 July 2026. Each of the eight providers is scored 1 to 5 on six axes weighted for small-business buyers, with no weighted total and no overall winner. We review the page quarterly and re-verify pricing monthly.

Common questions

Which EOR is best for a small business?
Depends on priority. Teamed leads the service model and employment intelligence and the path to your own entity; it contests pricing transparency with Remote and coverage with G-P. Deel and Rippling lead platform, the certified providers lead security. Remote: self-serve with owned entities. Oyster: fastest onboarding. Papaya, G-P and Pebl are enterprise-priced.
Is EOR worth it for a small business with just one international hire?
Yes, usually. EOR is faster and lower cost than setting up an entity before the first hire, which can take months and cost more than a year of EOR fees. The question is which provider gives you a readable cost, a real person to call, and a clear path to your own entity when headcount grows to justify it.

For the buying committee

Share with your team

Send this page to legal, finance, or HR for review. They will see the same statutory data and source citations you did.

The honest path

Want this scored for your countries?

Tell us your headcount and where you're hiring. A real HR or legal expert sends back a quote and a like-for-like breakdown. No demo, no deck.

Talk to an expert

Harry, sales specialist at Teamed — Harry · Sales

Mollie, sales specialist at Teamed — Mollie · Sales