White-label EOR providers · scored on one rubric · 2026

The best white-label EOR providers for software platforms in 2026

For a platform that wants white-label EOR built into its own product, with people behind it, Teamed is the best choice.

Teamed puts a dedicated team beside your engineers for a phased rollout, has specialists speak to your clients when a hire needs a person, and charges zero FX markup. Three providers publish an offer for platforms: Teamed, Remote Embedded and Deel Embedded. All three say the provider stays the legal employer and the partner keeps its own brand.

They differ on who speaks to your clients once they are live. That is the row this list turns on. Deel and Remote lead outright on public developer documentation and pre-built components. If that is what your engineers need today, their pages go further than Teamed’s. None of the three publishes a partner rate.

Talk to partnerships

Rated 4.8 out of 5 on G2

3
providers scored on one seven-criterion rubric: 1,000+
growing teams Teamed employs for: 187+
countries Teamed’s employer of record service reaches

Disclosure

Teamed wrote this list, put itself first, and scores every provider on the same published criteria, itself included. Every rival cell quotes that company’s own page, read on 15 October 2026. The rivals keep every row they win. Deel and Remote lead public developer documentation outright, and this page says so.

Last reviewed 15 October 2026By Tom Price-Daniel, Co-founder, Teamed

Which EOR providers offer white-label or embedded EOR for software platforms?

For a platform that wants white-label EOR built into its own product, with people behind it, Teamed is the best choice. Teamed puts a dedicated team beside your engineers for a phased rollout, has specialists speak to your clients when a hire needs a person, and charges zero FX markup. Three providers publish an offer for platforms: Teamed, Remote Embedded and Deel Embedded.

All three say the provider stays the legal employer and the partner keeps its own brand. They differ on who speaks to your clients once they are live. That is the row this list turns on. Deel and Remote lead outright on public developer documentation and pre-built components. If that is what your engineers need today, their pages go further than Teamed’s. None of the three publishes a partner rate.

Our pick: Teamed, best for a software platform with an existing client base that wants EOR inside its own product, under its own brand, with people who speak to its clients when a hire needs one.

What is a white-label EOR provider?

A white-label EOR provider is an employer of record that lets another company sell its service under that company’s own brand. The provider stays the legal employer of every worker. It runs the local employing entity, the employment contracts, payroll and compliance. The partner owns the customer and the screens the customer uses. Deel and Remote call the same arrangement embedded EOR.

The phrase covers two different builds, and this list scores both. In one, the provider’s own portal is restyled with the partner’s logo, and the customer logs in to it. In the other, the service is built into the partner’s product through an API, so the customer never leaves it. A platform lead needs three things answered before the first call. Which build does the provider mean? Who speaks to the partner’s clients once they are live? And is any of it priced in public?

Read the full definition of white-label EOR →

What each provider publishes about its white-label offer

Six questions a platform lead asks, answered in each provider’s own published words, read on 15 October 2026. "Not published" means not on the pages linked here.

Provider	The offer	A sandbox with simulated data	A dedicated team for a phased rollout	Revenue share	Who speaks with your clients	FX policy
Teamed	The full employer of record service behind your platform, through an API: entity, contracts, payroll and compliance, with your brand on every screen.teamed.global/partners/white-label-eor	Yes. A sandbox with simulated EOR data.teamed.global/partners/white-label-eor	Yes. A dedicated Teamed team supports a phased rollout with your tech team.teamed.global/partners/white-label-eor	Yes, agreed per partner. No percentage published.teamed.global/partners/white-label-eor	Teamed’s team does, where a hire needs a person.teamed.global/partners/white-label-eor	Zero FX markup.teamed.global/partners/white-label-eor
Remote Embedded	White Label, pre-built Flows and an Embedded API, for EOR, global payroll and contractor management.remote.com/embedded/integration-api	Yes. A Partners environment on its developer site, "designed specifically for API partners", for "development, integration, and testing".developer.remote.com, Environment setup	A dedicated team, yes: "a dedicated team supporting you from implementation through to go-to-market outcomes". A phased rollout is not published.remote.com/embedded	On its partner page, yes: "options like revenue sharing, referral bonuses, discounts for your customers". Not on its Embedded pages.remote.com/partners	Not published for your clients. The support described is for the partner: "a direct connection to our product and engineering teams".remote.com/embedded	Yes, as a policy, not a markup figure: a fixed monthly "Remote FX rate" applied to all invoices for that month, which "will vary from month to month with transaction volume, the volatility of the currency pair, and conversion cost".support.remote.com, Remote FX rate
Deel Embedded	Three models: "Deel’s platform rebranded as yours", a hybrid, and "Build Deel’s APIs natively into your product", with developer documentation for employer and worker flows and webhooks.deel.com/solutions/embedded	Yes. "The Deel API Sandbox is a completely isolated testing environment", "pre-populated with sample data".developer.deel.com, Sandbox	Implementation support, yes: "solution engineering and implementation support across all models". A dedicated team for a phased rollout is not published.deel.com/solutions/embedded	On its partner page, yes: "revenue-sharing incentives". Its embedded page says "Commercials are based on how you package and monetize workforce capabilities for your customers".deel.com/partner-program	You do: "You own the customer relationship and first-line support. Deel supports second-line escalation".deel.com/solutions/embedded	A sentence, not a policy. Its pricing page says "Deel provides competitive exchange rates and multiple payment methods, ensuring your contractors and employees get paid efficiently in their preferred currency, with minimal fees". No rate, markup figure or FX policy for partner-sourced payroll on the pages read.deel.com/pricing

Every cell is the provider’s own published wording, read on 15 October 2026. Nothing a rival publishes has been trimmed or softened. Deel’s help centre could not be reached that day, so its FX cell is its pricing page alone.

Methodology

How we scored this comparison

Each provider is scored 1 to 5 on seven criteria, with no weighted total. Teamed leads the rows about people and the service model. That is why it is the pick for a platform that wants people behind the product. Deel and Remote lead public developer documentation outright and share the lead on the sandbox. Nobody wins the commercial row, because nobody publishes a rate. On FX, Teamed publishes the policy and the figure. Remote publishes the policy without a figure. Deel publishes a sentence.

Service model published: Whether the provider says, on its own pages, what the partner’s client sees: the provider’s portal restyled, the service built into the partner’s product, or both.
Who supports the partner’s end clients: Whether the provider’s own people speak to the partner’s clients when a hire needs a person, or the partner owns that support itself. Scored on what each provider publishes.
Sandbox with simulated or sample data: A test environment the partner’s engineers can build against before anything is live, and whether it is documented in public.
Dedicated team for rollout: Whether the provider publishes a dedicated team for the integration and rollout, and whether the rollout is phased.
Commercial model published: Whether the shape of the deal is public: revenue share, referral fees or a wholesale rate, minimums, and who invoices the end client. A published rate would score 5. None of the three publishes one.
FX policy published: Whether the provider publishes an FX policy for the partner’s clients’ payroll, and whether that policy carries a markup figure. A policy with the figure scores 5. A policy without one scores 3. A sentence with neither scores 2.
Public developer documentation: Reference documentation and pre-built components an engineer can read today without signing anything. Deel and Remote lead this row outright. Teamed scores low and says so.

How we gathered evidence

Every rival cell quotes the provider’s own page, read on 15 October 2026. For Remote: remote.com/embedded, remote.com/embedded/integration-api, remote.com/partners and developer.remote.com (Environment setup). For Deel: deel.com/solutions/embedded, deel.com/partner-program, developer.deel.com (embedded overview) and developer.deel.com (Sandbox). For FX: support.remote.com (Remote FX rate), remote.com/pricing and deel.com/pricing. Teamed’s claims come from teamed.global/partners/white-label-eor and the Teamed brand database, verified the same day. Teamed’s G2 rating is 4.8 out of 5. The rivals’ G2 ratings are not shown here, because they were not read from a live profile on the day. "Not published" means not on the pages listed.

Considered & excluded

The providers that publish a white-label or embedded EOR offer for software platforms on their own pages: Teamed, Remote Embedded and Deel Embedded, each scored at the same depth.

Other providers whose own pages describe a white-label offer: This list scores three providers at full depth. Two more describe a white-label offer on pages read on 15 October 2026. They are named here in their own words rather than scored. Playroll’s partner page offers a reseller model: "White-label Playroll so you own the client relationship end-to-end" (playroll.com/partners). Ascen’s home page offers staffing organisations a "White-label all-in-one platform" and an "API connection for staffing and gig platforms" (ascen.com). RemoFirst’s partner page describes a co-branded "Powered by RemoFirst" option and resellers, not a white label (remofirst.com/partner-program). Lano’s partner page is an affiliate programme (lano.io/become-a-partner). NEO’s and RemotePeople’s pages could not be read that day. Each joins the scored list, with its own wording and the date read, once its pages have been read in full.

How they score, criterion by criterion

Each column is a different priority. Pick the ones that matter to you, then read the write-ups below.

Provider	Service model published	Who supports the partner’s end clients	Sandbox with simulated or sample data	Dedicated team for rollout	Commercial model published	FX policy published	Public developer documentation
Teamed(us)	Leads	Leads		Leads	Leads	Leads
Remote Embedded			Leads				Leads
Deel Embedded

Scored 1–5 on each criterion from the published rubric above. The highlighted cell leads that column. Teamed is scored on exactly the same criteria as every other provider.

Teamed

Us, scored on the same rubric

Best for: a software platform with an existing client base that wants EOR inside its own product, under its own brand, with people who speak to its clients when a hire needs one.

Teamed runs the full employer of record service underneath a partner’s own platform. The partner sells EOR under its own brand: its own screens, its own client journey. Teamed is the legal employer, running contracts, payroll and compliance through an API. Inside your product, a provider’s hidden charge is your hidden charge. So Teamed’s FX policy for partners is zero FX markup.

The row this list turns on is who speaks to your clients once they are live. Teamed’s position is published. Where a hire needs a person, Teamed’s team speaks directly with the partner’s clients to confirm requirements and get the hire moving. Deel publishes the opposite. Remote publishes support for the partner, not the partner’s clients. A dedicated Teamed team runs a phased rollout with your tech team. Your engineers get partner API access and a sandbox with simulated EOR data.

Teamed’s weakness is the row Deel and Remote win outright. There is no self-serve public developer documentation today. The partner API is set up with Teamed’s integration team, and what each flow moves is published as a ledger with its blank cells showing. The commercial model is revenue share, agreed per partner. No percentage or wholesale rate is published. Teamed employs for 1,000+ growing teams and is rated 4.8 out of 5 on G2.

Countries: 187+ reach for the employer of record service
Entity model: Teamed is the legal employer, through its local employing entity
Onboarding: A phased rollout with a dedicated Teamed team; no duration published
Contractors: Not published for the white-label offer
Pricing: Not published. Set in the partnership agreement · verified 2026-10-15
G2: 4.8/5

Strengths

Teamed’s team speaks directly with your clients where a hire needs a person. It is the one row where both rivals publish the opposite.
A dedicated Teamed team supports a phased rollout with your tech team. Partners get API access, a sandbox with simulated EOR data and guidance on the APIs.
Zero FX markup, published as policy with the figure. The rivals publish no markup figure on the pages read.
The service lives in your platform, with your own screens and client journey. It is not a Teamed portal with your logo on it.

Watch-outs

No self-serve public developer documentation or pre-built components today. Partner API access is set up with Teamed’s integration team, and Deel’s and Remote’s developer sites go further.
No partner rate, revenue-share percentage or minimum is published. The commercial terms are agreed per partner.
The partner API ledger is published at the level of four flows today. The field-level detail is confirmed with your tech team before you build, so an engineer cannot scope the build from the page alone.

Source: teamed.global/partners/white-label-eor

Remote Embedded

Best for: a platform whose engineers want published pre-built flows and an embedded API to build from today, with a dedicated Remote team for the implementation. Remote publishes no support for the partner’s own clients on the pages read.

Remote publishes three ways in on its embedded pages: "White Label, pre-built Flows and an Embedded API". They cover EOR, global payroll and contractor management, so a partner can "deliver global employment services fully under their own brand". The models are documented in public. That is why Remote scores top on the service-model row and on developer documentation. An engineer can read the integration API pages and the Partners environment guide without signing anything.

The rollout support is published too. Remote describes "a dedicated team supporting you from implementation through to go-to-market outcomes". Its developer site documents a Partners environment "designed specifically for API partners", for "development, integration, and testing". A phased rollout is not published. The support that is published is for the partner, not the partner’s clients: "a direct connection to our product and engineering teams". Who speaks to your clients when a hire needs a person is not on the pages read.

On commercials, Remote publishes the shape and not the rate. Its partner page names "options like revenue sharing, referral bonuses, discounts for your customers". Its Embedded pages say nothing on money. Remote publishes its FX policy as a fixed monthly Remote FX rate, without a markup figure. Its pricing FAQ adds that it sets "one rate for each monthly billing cycle" and that "that rate remains locked for the cycle".

Countries: Not published for the embedded offer on the pages read
Entity model: Remote is the legal employer under the partner’s brand
Onboarding: A dedicated team "from implementation through to go-to-market outcomes"; no phases or duration published
Contractors: Yes: contractor management is one of the embedded products
Pricing: Not published. Set in the partnership agreement · verified 2026-10-15

Strengths

Three published models, "White Label, pre-built Flows and an Embedded API", so a partner can choose how deep to build.
Public developer documentation and a documented Partners environment "designed specifically for API partners", readable before any agreement.
A dedicated team published for the implementation, "from implementation through to go-to-market outcomes".
The embedded offer spans EOR, global payroll and contractor management. A partner can add more than one product under its brand.

Watch-outs

Support for the partner’s clients is not published. The support described is for the partner, "a direct connection to our product and engineering teams".
No partner rate or minimum is published, and the FX policy gives no markup figure. The partner page names revenue sharing and referral bonuses as options, not terms.
A phased rollout is not published, so a partner cannot tell from the pages how go-live is staged.

Source: remote.com/embedded

Deel Embedded

Best for: a platform that wants to choose between a rebranded Deel portal and a native API build, read the developer documentation first, and own first-line support for its own customers.

Deel publishes the clearest menu of the three. Its embedded page offers three models: "Deel’s platform rebranded as yours", a hybrid, and "Build Deel’s APIs natively into your product". Developer documentation for employer and worker flows and webhooks sits on developer.deel.com. That public documentation is why Deel scores top on developer documentation and on the service-model row. Its embedded developer overview says the model allows compliant employment in 150 or more countries (Deel’s own figure, written on its page with a plus sign).

The sandbox is published in full: "The Deel API Sandbox is a completely isolated testing environment", "pre-populated with sample data". Implementation help is published as "solution engineering and implementation support across all models". A dedicated team for a phased rollout is not. On support, Deel is explicit that the partner owns it: "You own the customer relationship and first-line support. Deel supports second-line escalation". That is the opposite of Teamed’s published position, and it is the row that decides this list.

On money, Deel publishes a principle and not a price: "Commercials are based on how you package and monetize workforce capabilities for your customers". Its partner page adds "revenue-sharing incentives". On FX, its pricing page says it "provides competitive exchange rates" with "minimal fees". No rate, markup figure or FX policy for partner-sourced payroll is published on the pages read.

Countries: Compliant employment in 150 or more countries, Deel’s own figure on its embedded developer overview (developer.deel.com, read 15 October 2026)
Entity model: Deel is the legal employer under the partner’s brand
Onboarding: "Solution engineering and implementation support across all models"; no phases or duration published
Contractors: Not published for the embedded offer on the pages read
Pricing: Not published. Set in the partnership agreement · verified 2026-10-15

Strengths

Three published models, from "Deel’s platform rebranded as yours" to "Build Deel’s APIs natively into your product". A partner can start shallow and go deeper.
Public developer documentation for employer and worker flows and webhooks, readable before any agreement.
A documented sandbox, "a completely isolated testing environment", "pre-populated with sample data".
"Solution engineering and implementation support across all models", published for every model.

Watch-outs

The partner owns first-line support for its own customers: "You own the customer relationship and first-line support. Deel supports second-line escalation".
No partner rate, minimum or FX markup figure is published on the pages read. Commercials "are based on how you package and monetize workforce capabilities for your customers".
A dedicated team for a phased rollout is not published. The published help is implementation support.

Source: deel.com/solutions/embedded

Why the shortlist matters

Behind every line item is a real person, in a real place.

The fee, the FX and the support model are not abstractions. They decide whether the person you hired in Barcelona or Rome is paid right, on time, by someone who knows their employment law. That is what the ranking is really measuring.

What each stakeholder evaluates

Criterion	Legal	Finance	People Ops	Security
Who supports your clients once they are live	Ask who the employment contract names, and who answers your client when a hire stalls on a document.	Support you run yourself is a cost line in your product. Deel publishes that the partner owns first-line support. Teamed publishes that its team speaks with your clients where a hire needs a person.	A hire that needs a person is where adoption is won or lost inside your product.	Fewer hand-offs between your support and the provider’s means fewer places client data changes hands.
What your engineers can read today	Ask whether the documentation you are building against is public and versioned, or shared under the agreement.	Public documentation shortens scoping. Deel and Remote publish theirs. Teamed sets up partner API access with its integration team.	A sandbox with sample or simulated data lets the product team test flows before any client is live. All three publish one.	Ask what the sandbox contains and how test data is separated from live data.
What the deal costs	Ask for the commercial model in writing: revenue share, referral fee or wholesale rate, minimums, and who invoices the end client.	None of the three publishes a partner rate. Ask each for the FX markup on your clients’ payroll in writing. Teamed publishes zero FX markup. Remote publishes a monthly FX rate without a markup figure. Deel publishes a sentence about competitive rates with minimal fees.	A charge your customer cannot see on the invoice is still a charge inside your product.	Ask who collects payment from the end client and where that data sits.

Decision checklist

If you want EOR inside your own product with people behind it, who speak to your clients when a hire needs a person, choose Teamed.
If your engineers want public, self-serve developer documentation and pre-built components today, Deel and Remote publish theirs.
If you want the provider’s portal rebranded as yours, with your customer logging in to it, Deel publishes that model explicitly.
If you will run first-line support for your own customers and want the provider as second line, that is Deel’s published model.
Whichever you choose, ask for the commercial model, the minimums, the FX markup and who invoices the end client, in writing. None of the three publishes a rate.

Email this to legal

Honest take

When Deel or Remote is the better choice.

Your engineers want public, self-serve developer documentation and pre-built components they can read and build against today. Deel and Remote publish theirs. Teamed sets up partner API access with its integration team.
You want the provider’s own portal restyled with your logo rather than a service built into your product. Deel publishes that model as "Deel’s platform rebranded as yours".
You plan to own first-line support for your own customers and want the provider only as second-line escalation. That is Deel’s published model.

Teamed leads the rows about people and the service model, not the developer-documentation row. A platform whose first question is "what can we read today" should pick on that row.

Frequently asked questions

Which EOR providers have an API to embed employer of record in our product?
Three publish one for platforms. Deel documents employer and worker flows and webhooks on developer.deel.com, with a sandbox "pre-populated with sample data". Remote publishes an Embedded API, pre-built Flows and a Partners environment on developer.remote.com. Teamed gives partners API access set up with its integration team, with webhooks, real-time data flows in both directions and a sandbox with simulated EOR data. It is not a self-serve public developer API. If reading the documentation before you sign is your first test, Deel and Remote pass it today.
How did we score them?
Each provider is scored 1 to 5 on seven criteria. They are: service model published, who supports the partner’s end clients, a sandbox with simulated or sample data, a dedicated team for rollout, commercial model published, FX policy published, and public developer documentation. There is no weighted total. Every rival cell quotes the provider’s own page, read on 15 October 2026. The rivals keep every row they win.
Who supports your clients once they are live?
It depends on the provider, and it is the row this list turns on. Teamed publishes that where a hire needs a person, its team speaks directly with the partner’s clients. Deel publishes the opposite: "You own the customer relationship and first-line support. Deel supports second-line escalation". Remote publishes support for the partner, "a direct connection to our product and engineering teams". It publishes nothing for the partner’s clients on the pages read.
What does none of them publish?
A partner rate. None of the three publishes a revenue-share percentage, a wholesale per-employee rate or a minimum. Remote names "options like revenue sharing, referral bonuses, discounts for your customers". Deel says "Commercials are based on how you package and monetize workforce capabilities for your customers". Teamed says revenue share, agreed per partner. The pricing article explains how the market prices white-label EOR and what to ask for in writing.
Is white-label EOR the same as embedded EOR?
Yes, the same arrangement under two names. Deel and Remote call it embedded EOR. Buyers who search for it, and Teamed, say white-label EOR. The glossary term sets out both meanings.

Common questions

Which EOR provider is best for a software platform that wants to sell EOR under its own brand?
For a platform that wants white-label EOR built into its own product, with people behind it, Teamed is the best choice. Its specialists speak to your clients when a hire needs a person, a dedicated team runs a phased rollout, and it charges zero FX markup. Deel and Remote publish deeper public developer documentation. Deel’s model has you own first-line support. None of the three publishes a partner rate.
Do Deel and Remote offer white-label EOR?
Yes, as embedded EOR. Deel offers a rebranded portal, a hybrid or a native API build, with the partner owning first-line support. Remote offers White Label, pre-built Flows and an Embedded API with a dedicated implementation team. Both publish developer documentation and a sandbox. Neither publishes a partner rate, and neither publishes an FX markup figure.

For the buying committee

Share with your team

Send this page to legal, finance, or HR for review. They will see the same statutory data and source citations you did.

The honest path

Want this scored for your countries?

Tell us your headcount and where you're hiring. A real HR or legal expert sends back a quote and a like-for-like breakdown. No demo, no deck.

Talk to an expert

Harry, sales specialist at Teamed — Harry · Sales

Mollie, sales specialist at Teamed — Mollie · Sales