Cross-Border Hiring, UK Mid-Market Employer Guide to EU Pay Transparency

Picture this: You're a UK-based scale-up with 200 employees, posting a senior developer role without a salary range. A brilliant candidate in Berlin applies, you hire them through an Employer of Record (EoR), and six months later you're facing a discrimination claim under Germany's implementation of the EU Pay Transparency Directive. The lack of upfront salary disclosure has created legal exposure you never saw coming.

This scenario isn't hypothetical anymore. The EU Pay Transparency Directive is reshaping how companies must approach cross-border hiring, and UK employers expanding into European markets face a complex web of disclosure obligations that vary by country and employment structure. Whether you're hiring directly, through subsidiaries, or via EoR arrangements, understanding these rules can help protect your business from compliance risks while potentially improving your talent acquisition strategy.

Key Takeaways:

• UK companies hiring EU-based workers face local transparency obligations regardless of their UK headquarters location
• Salary disclosure requirements vary significantly across EU member states, with different timelines and thresholds
• Using an EoR doesn't eliminate transparency obligations - it often creates shared compliance responsibilities
• Mid-market firms (100-500 employees) may trigger reporting thresholds sooner than expected when counting global headcount
• Non-compliance risks include financial penalties, discrimination claims, and damage to employer brand

Does the EU Pay Transparency Directive Reach UK Employers Hiring Into Europe

The EU Pay Transparency Directive, which came into force in June 2023, requires member states to implement comprehensive pay transparency measures by June 2026. Despite Brexit, this directive can still impact UK companies in significant ways, especially after the EU Court validated wage-setting directives in November 2025.

The key principle is straightforward: it's the "place of work" that determines which country's rules apply, not where your company is headquartered. When you hire someone based in Germany, France, or Spain, you become subject to that country's implementation of the directive, regardless of your UK registration.

This means UK employers with cross-border operations often find themselves navigating multiple transparency regimes simultaneously. A London-based fintech hiring developers in Berlin, account managers in Paris, and customer support staff in Madrid may need to comply with three different sets of disclosure requirements.

The directive covers several key areas that directly affect hiring practices:

• Mandatory salary ranges in job advertisements or before interviews
• Prohibition on asking candidates about their salary history
• Employee rights to request pay information and explanations for pay decisions
• Regular pay gap reporting for larger employers

For mid-market companies (typically 200-2,000 employees), these obligations can trigger earlier than expected. Many countries count all employees within a corporate group, including those hired through EoR arrangements, when determining reporting thresholds.

Why Mid-Market Companies Should Disclose Salary Ranges

While compliance drives the immediate need for transparency, smart mid-market employers are discovering that salary disclosure can actually strengthen their competitive position in European markets.

‍

Mid-market companies face unique challenges that make transparency particularly valuable. Unlike enterprise organizations with dedicated legal teams, they need streamlined approaches that work across multiple countries without requiring extensive resources. Unlike startups, they're large enough to face meaningful regulatory scrutiny and financial penalties.

The operational efficiency gains often surprise HR leaders. When salary ranges are clear from the start, hiring managers spend less time on unproductive interviews with candidates whose expectations don't align. Finance teams can budget more accurately when compensation parameters are established upfront.

Directive Scope for Establishment, Place of Work and EoR Arrangements

Understanding exactly when and how the directive applies requires clarity on three key concepts: establishment, place of work, and how third-party employment arrangements fit within the framework.

UK Entity Hiring EU-Based Employees

When a UK company directly employs someone based in an EU member state, that worker's physical location determines which transparency rules apply. This creates obligations even without a local legal entity.

Consider a practical example: A Manchester-based software company hires a senior product manager who works remotely from her home in Amsterdam. Despite having no Dutch entity, the company must comply with Netherlands' implementation of the directive for this role. This includes providing salary ranges before interviews and ensuring the job posting meets local disclosure requirements.

The complexity increases when roles involve travel or hybrid arrangements. Generally, the worker's primary work location drives compliance obligations, but some countries have specific rules for mobile workers or those splitting time between locations.

EU Entity Hiring UK-Based Employees

The reverse scenario creates different dynamics. If your UK company has established subsidiaries in EU countries, those entities must comply with local transparency rules when hiring within their jurisdiction, even for UK-based positions that report into the EU office.

This commonly affects financial services firms with European regulatory entities. A Dublin-based subsidiary of a London investment firm must follow Irish transparency requirements when hiring compliance officers, even if those officers will primarily work with UK operations.

Third-Party EoR Structures Across 180+ Countries

Using an EoR doesn't eliminate transparency obligations, it redistributes them. Both the client company and the EoR provider typically share responsibility for compliance, though the specific allocation varies by provider and jurisdiction.

Most EoR agreements specify that clients remain responsible for job posting content and candidate communications, while the EoR handles local employment law compliance and payroll processing. This means you'll likely need to ensure your job advertisements meet local transparency requirements, even when the EoR manages the actual employment relationship.

The shared responsibility model requires clear communication between client and provider. When Teamed supports EoR arrangements, we help clarify these responsibilities and can guide clients through country-specific disclosure requirements to support compliance across multiple jurisdictions.

Key Disclosure Obligations Once You Hit 100 Employees

The 100-employee threshold appears in many EU countries' implementations, but how you count employees can be more complex than expected for companies with international operations.

Most countries calculate thresholds based on total employees within the corporate group, including subsidiaries and, in some cases, workers hired through EoR arrangements. A UK company with 80 direct employees, 25 workers through various EoRs in Europe, and 15 employees in a German subsidiary may find itself subject to reporting requirements in multiple jurisdictions.

‍

Salary Range in Job Ads

Compliant salary ranges must be specific enough to be meaningful while reflecting the actual compensation you're prepared to offer. Ranges like "competitive salary" or "up to €80,000" typically don't meet requirements.

Compliant examples include:

• "€65,000 - €75,000 annual salary plus benefits package valued at €8,000"
• "£45,000 - £55,000 base salary (total compensation €55,000 - €65,000)"
• "CHF 90,000 - CHF 110,000 depending on experience and qualifications"

Non-compliant approaches often include:

• Vague references to "competitive compensation"
• Ranges so broad they provide no meaningful guidance (€30,000 - €100,000)
• Omitting currency or failing to specify whether figures include bonuses

Transparency Before Interview

Most countries require disclosure of pay range and criteria before the first substantive interview. This goes beyond just stating a number - you may need to explain how pay is determined and what factors influence positioning within the range.

Candidates also gain rights to understand pay structures. They can ask about criteria used for pay decisions, typical progression paths, and how their compensation compares to similar roles. Preparing hiring managers for these conversations helps ensure consistent, compliant responses.

Annual Pay Gap Reporting

Larger employers must regularly analyze and report on pay gaps, typically broken down by gender and sometimes by other protected characteristics, particularly relevant given women represent 34.8% of EU managers. This requires collecting and maintaining detailed compensation data across all locations and employment types.

The reporting often includes median pay gaps, mean pay gaps, and explanations for significant differences. Some countries require publication of this data, while others limit sharing to employee representatives or regulatory authorities.

Risks of Posting UK Roles Without Pay Bands Then Hiring Through an EoR

Equal Pay Claims and Financial Penalties

Individual employees can file discrimination claims if they believe the lack of upfront transparency contributed to unequal treatment. These claims can be particularly challenging to defend when similarly situated candidates received different information or treatment based on their location.

Class-action style claims are also emerging in some jurisdictions, where groups of employees challenge systemic practices around pay transparency. The financial exposure can be significant, especially when combined with regulatory penalties from national enforcement agencies.

Enforcement approaches vary significantly across Europe. Germany tends toward individual complaint mechanisms, while some Nordic countries have more proactive regulatory oversight. France combines both approaches with additional works council involvement in larger organizations.

Employer Brand and Talent Pipeline Damage

The reputational impacts often exceed immediate financial costs. In competitive talent markets, transparency failures can quickly spread through professional networks and online employer review platforms.

Common brand impacts include:

• Decreased application rates as word spreads about opaque hiring practices
• Negative reviews on Glassdoor, LinkedIn, and local job platforms
• Longer time-to-hire as quality candidates become more selective
• Higher compensation demands as candidates factor in perceived risk

The damage can be particularly acute in specialized fields where professionals know each other and share experiences. A poorly handled transparency issue with one senior developer can affect your ability to attract others in that community.

Corrective Back-Pay and Admin Costs

When transparency violations are identified, remediation often requires comprehensive pay audits across affected populations. This means analyzing historical compensation decisions, identifying potential disparities, and calculating appropriate adjustments.

The administrative burden multiplies across jurisdictions. Different countries have different requirements for how corrections must be calculated, documented, and implemented. Currency fluctuations can complicate back-pay calculations for roles that have changed locations or compensation structures.

Additional costs often include updating job posting templates, retraining hiring managers, implementing new approval processes, and potentially re-posting roles that were filled without proper transparency.

Roll-Out Timeline for France, Germany, Spain and Nordic Markets

Implementation timelines and specific requirements vary significantly across major European markets, creating a complex compliance landscape for companies operating in multiple countries.

‍

France

France has been a transparency pioneer, implementing comprehensive requirements ahead of the EU directive. The country's approach links pay transparency to its existing gender pay index, creating additional reporting obligations for mid-market employers.

French employers must include salary ranges in job postings and cannot ask about salary history during interviews. The country also requires detailed annual reporting on pay equity measures, including action plans to address identified gaps.

Works councils play a significant role in French transparency requirements, with enhanced consultation rights on compensation policies and individual pay decisions in larger organizations.

Germany

Germany's implementation timeline extends to the full June 2026 deadline, but draft legislation suggests comprehensive requirements similar to other major markets. The German approach emphasizes employee information rights and systematic pay transparency.

German employees gain strong rights to request information about pay criteria, comparison data for similar roles, and explanations for pay decisions. Employers must respond within specific timeframes and provide detailed justifications.

The country's co-determination system means works councils will likely have enhanced roles in transparency implementation, particularly around collective agreements and company-wide pay policies.

Spain

Spain implemented broad transparency requirements in 2022, ahead of the EU directive. Spanish companies must publish salary ranges for all positions and maintain detailed pay equity records.

The Spanish approach includes mandatory pay equity plans for companies over 100 employees, with specific requirements for identifying, analyzing, and addressing pay gaps. Regular audits and public reporting create additional compliance obligations.

Regional variations exist within Spain, with some autonomous communities implementing additional requirements or enforcement mechanisms.

Nordics

Nordic countries generally had strong transparency norms before the directive, but formal requirements vary significantly between Sweden, Denmark, and Norway.

Sweden requires detailed pay surveys and proactive gap analysis, with lower thresholds (25+ employees) than most EU countries. Denmark emphasizes collective bargaining integration, while Norway focuses on systematic reporting and public disclosure.

The Nordic approach often includes enhanced parental leave and benefits transparency, reflecting broader social policy integration with employment law.

Six Immediate Actions for UK People and Finance Leaders

Preparing for EU transparency requirements requires systematic planning across multiple functions. These six steps can help establish a foundation for compliance while potentially improving your hiring effectiveness.

1. Map Cross-Border Hiring Channels

Start with a comprehensive audit of all EU hiring activities. Document every country where you employ people, whether through direct employment, subsidiaries, or EoR arrangements.

Create a matrix showing current headcount by location and employment type. Include contractors who might be reclassified as employees, as these relationships can affect threshold calculations and compliance obligations.

Identify decision-makers for each hiring channel. Who approves job postings? Who conducts interviews? Who makes final compensation decisions? Understanding these workflows helps determine where transparency requirements must be integrated.

2. Benchmark Market-Aligned Pay Ranges

Gather current salary data for each role and location where you hire. Local compensation surveys, industry reports, and specialized benchmarking services can provide the detailed data needed for compliant ranges, especially critical with 4.0% hourly labour cost growth across the EU in Q2 2025.

Factor in total compensation, not just base salary. Many countries require disclosure of benefits, bonuses, and other variable elements. Currency considerations become important for roles that might relocate or change reporting structures.

Build ranges that reflect your actual hiring intentions. Artificially narrow ranges that don't match your flexibility can create legal exposure, while overly broad ranges may not meet compliance requirements.

3. Update Job Advert Templates

Standardize templates that include compliant salary disclosure language for each target market. Consider local preferences for how ranges are presented and what additional information candidates expect.

Include clear currency specifications and total compensation explanations. Specify whether figures are gross or net, annual or monthly, and how variable compensation is calculated.

Test templates with local hiring managers and candidates to ensure clarity and effectiveness. What works in London may not translate directly to Berlin or Stockholm.

4. Align EoR Agreements With Local Rules

Review existing EoR contracts to understand transparency responsibilities. Many agreements written before widespread transparency requirements may not clearly allocate compliance obligations.

Clarify data sharing arrangements needed for reporting requirements. If you're responsible for pay gap analysis, ensure your EoR can provide necessary compensation data in required formats.

Establish clear communication protocols for job postings, interview processes, and candidate communications. Misalignment between client and EoR practices can create compliance gaps.

5. Prepare Pay Gap Data Sets

Build data collection and analysis capabilities for annual reporting requirements. This often requires integrating information from multiple payroll systems, EoR providers, and local entities.

Define consistent job categories and comparison groups across locations. Different countries may have different requirements for how roles are grouped and analyzed for pay equity purposes.

Establish regular review cycles and data validation processes. Pay gap reporting often requires historical data, so starting data collection early helps ensure compliance when reporting deadlines arrive.

6. Train Hiring Managers on Range Discussions

Coach managers on how to discuss compensation transparently and consistently. This includes explaining how ranges are determined, what factors influence positioning, and how progression typically works.

Prepare responses to common candidate questions about pay criteria, benefits, and career progression. Consistent messaging helps avoid compliance issues while supporting effective candidate experience.

Practice scenarios where candidates challenge ranges or request additional information. Understanding rights and obligations helps managers respond appropriately while maintaining positive hiring relationships.

Common Pitfalls and How Teamed Advises Clients to Avoid Them

Even well-intentioned companies can stumble on transparency requirements due to the complexity of cross-border operations and evolving regulatory landscapes.

Overlooking EoR Headcount in Thresholds

Many companies count only direct employees when calculating reporting thresholds, missing workers hired through EoR arrangements. This can lead to unexpected compliance obligations when combined headcount crosses regulatory thresholds.

Teamed helps clients understand how different countries treat EoR workers in threshold calculations. We maintain detailed records that support accurate headcount reporting and can advise on timing considerations when approaching threshold limits.

Regular headcount audits become essential as you scale. What starts as a simple direct employment model can quickly become complex when contractors convert to employees or new EoR relationships are established.

Relying on Legacy UK Pay Policies

UK-centric compensation approaches often don't translate effectively to European markets with different legal requirements, cultural expectations, and economic conditions.

Successful transparency implementation typically requires localizing pay policies to reflect market conditions, legal requirements, and cultural norms. A one-size-fits-all approach from London rarely works across diverse European markets.

Teamed's country specialists can guide policy adaptation that maintains consistency with overall company values while meeting local requirements and expectations.

Ignoring Local Currency Benchmarking

Posting ranges in GBP for Berlin-based roles, or failing to account for purchasing power differences, can create compliance issues and candidate experience problems, particularly when minimum wages vary from 878 to 1,992 PPS after adjusting for purchasing power across the EU.

Local currency posting requirements vary by country, but presenting compensation in terms candidates understand improves application quality and reduces confusion during negotiations.

Regular benchmarking becomes essential as exchange rates fluctuate and local market conditions change. Annual reviews help ensure ranges remain competitive and compliant.

Talk to Teamed for Strategic Clarity on Cross-Border Pay Compliance

Navigating EU pay transparency as a UK employer doesn't have to mean choosing between growth speed and compliance quality. The regulatory landscape will continue evolving, but companies that build transparent, systematic approaches to cross-border hiring often find themselves better positioned for sustainable international expansion.

Teamed's advisory approach helps mid-market companies understand these complex requirements across 180+ countries. Our specialists can guide you through jurisdiction-specific disclosure obligations, EoR arrangement structuring, and compliance strategy that scales with your growth.

Whether you're evaluating your first European hire or consolidating multiple employment relationships across the continent, talk to the experts for strategic counsel on building compliant, effective international hiring processes.

FAQs About EU Pay Transparency for UK Employers

What triggers the 100-employee threshold across multiple entities?

Most EU countries count all employees across the corporate group, including subsidiaries and workers hired through EoR arrangements. This means your UK headcount, German subsidiary staff, and EoR workers in France may all contribute to threshold calculations that trigger reporting requirements in multiple jurisdictions.

Does remote work change the place-of-work test?

Generally, the worker's primary physical work location determines which country's transparency rules apply. A remote hire working from their home in Germany triggers German disclosure requirements, regardless of where your company is headquartered or which entity employs them.

Are bonuses and equity awards covered by the Directive?

Yes, most implementations cover total compensation including bonuses, equity, and other variable elements. Job postings should reflect full compensation packages, not just base salary, and ranges should account for typical bonus and equity values in meaningful ways.

What happens if an EU country accelerates its own timeline?

Member states can implement stricter or earlier requirements than the directive mandates. Companies should monitor implementation in their target markets, as some countries may accelerate deadlines or expand scope beyond minimum EU requirements.

What is mid-market?

Mid-market typically refers to companies with 200-2,000 employees or £10M-£1B revenue. These organizations face unique cross-border compliance challenges because they're large enough to trigger regulatory requirements but often lack the dedicated legal resources that enterprise companies maintain for international employment law.or