Hiring Sales in Financial Services: Managing Risk Guide

Compliance

Financial Services Sales Hiring: Managing Compliance Risk For Mid-Market Companies

Building a revenue team across Europe sounds straightforward until you hit the reality of MiFID II, FCA fit-and-proper tests, and BaFin tied-agent requirements. What started as hiring a few quota-carrying salespeople in London and Frankfurt suddenly becomes a maze of individual registrations, bonus cap variations, and local substance rules that can derail your expansion timeline.

Mid-market financial services firms—those scaling from 200 to 2,000 employees—face a particularly challenging scenario. You're large enough to attract regulatory scrutiny but often lack the dedicated compliance resources that enterprise firms take for granted. One misstep in employment model selection or licensing requirements can trigger fines, restrict client onboarding permissions, or damage the investor confidence that fuels your growth trajectory.

Key Takeaways

Before diving into the complexities of regulated sales hiring, here are the strategic choices and outcomes that matter most for cross-border expansion:

  • Strategic hiring models compared in one place: Contractor, EOR, and local entity options mapped to regulatory risk, speed, and control requirements across European markets.
  • Mid-market triggers for switching from EOR to entity: Team size thresholds, payroll volume benchmarks, and client-onboarding permission needs that drive timing decisions.
  • Europe-specific licence and bonus rules decoded: FCA, BaFin, and AMF approval processes plus bonus cap variations that shape role design and compensation planning.
  • Five-step blueprint to hire fast without fines: Map obligations, select the right model per market, localise incentives, run regulatory checks, and monitor rule changes with expert guidance.

The Compliance Stakes Of Hiring Sales In Financial Services

Financial services sales roles often require regulated permissions and individual accountability under regimes such as the UK FCA, Germany's BaFin, and France's AMF. These frameworks govern who can market, advise, and onboard clients, and how firms supervise those individuals.

Mid-market companies expanding into multiple EU markets typically encounter fragmented rules on licensing, bonus caps, client communications, and reporting. This creates cumulative compliance exposure during rapid hiring phases when speed-to-market pressure is highest.

Consider a UK fintech opening Germany and France. They might face tied-agent supervision obligations in Germany while needing AMF registration for sales staff in France. A payments scale-up switching from EORs to entities could discover that local substance expectations require direct employment for client-facing teams, forcing a costly model transition mid-expansion.

Regulatory fines and licence loss

Breaches can trigger restrictions on activities, suspension, or revocation of permissions. This disrupts live sales pipelines, limits new client onboarding capabilities, and forces costly remediation efforts that can extend for months.

Licence issues often undermine distribution agreements and partner confidence, delaying market entry timelines and elongating sales cycles when revenue teams are already under pressure to deliver growth.

Brand damage and funding risk

Compliance incidents raise red flags during investor due diligence processes, potentially extending deal timelines and compressing valuation multiples at critical funding rounds.

Reputational damage reduces enterprise customer trust, increasing win-loss rates and adding procurement scrutiny that can double sales cycle lengths in competitive markets.

Contractor, EOR Or Entity, Which Model Fits A Regulated Sales Team?

Each employment model carries distinct regulatory implications, speed considerations, and compliance requirements that can significantly impact your expansion strategy.

Model Regulatory implications Speed to hire Compliance requirements
Contractor (freelancer) High misclassification risk for quota-carrying, supervised roles. Contractors often cannot hold required registrations under firm oversight, limiting their ability to conduct regulated activities. Fast initial setup, but potentially slow if regulators challenge employment status or permission structures. Limited employer controls make it difficult to enforce conduct rules, implement clawback provisions, and maintain required reporting standards.
EOR (Employer of Record) Provides employee status through a third party, which can work for supporting roles while potentially reducing administrative HR costs by 30-50%. For regulated front-office positions, requires careful mapping of supervision responsibilities and permission structures. Faster than entity establishment, with onboarding typically completed within weeks while regulatory approvals run in parallel. Requires documented supervision frameworks, conduct training programs, and aligned bonus and record-keeping systems. Some markets may still expect local substance for client-facing work.
Local entity (own subsidiary/branch) Offers the best alignment with supervision expectations, accountability frameworks, and local substance requirements. Enables direct registrations and streamlined regulatory reporting. Slowest initial setup due to entity establishment, payroll configuration, and registration processes, typically requiring 2-4 months. However, provides fastest long-term scaling for compliant operations. Full responsibility for regulatory reporting, remuneration governance, and oversight systems with direct control over all processes.

Misclassification and MiFID passporting

Quota-carrying sales roles with exclusivity arrangements, set working hours, and direct supervision typically indicate employment rather than contracting relationships. Misclassification can trigger tax penalties, social security obligations, and labour law violations.

MiFID II passporting for investment services often relies on firm-level permissions that extend across EU/EEA markets. Employment status matters because supervised individuals must operate within the permissioned firm's governance structure. Contractors outside this perimeter usually cannot conduct regulated activities under the firm's permissions.

Payroll and variable compensation controls

Regulated roles may require malus provisions, clawback mechanisms, and ratio caps on variable compensation. EOR providers may support these terms both contractually and operationally, while entities can integrate them directly into remuneration policies and regulatory reporting systems.

Reporting obligations vary significantly across jurisdictions. Some require detailed remuneration disclosure, risk alignment attestations, and individual employee tracking. Systems must capture award events, deferral periods, and clawback triggers to meet regulatory requirements.

Markets like the UK (SYSC/Remuneration Codes) and EU CRD/IFR regimes impose different structural requirements. Plan design and documentation must align with local frameworks on a market-by-market basis.

Speed to hire versus local substance rules

EOR arrangements can support early market testing and non-advisory prospecting activities while regulatory approvals progress through official channels, with providers typically completing onboarding within 7-21 days.

The shift to entity structures typically becomes necessary when client-facing onboarding, local oversight requirements, or rising headcount triggers substance expectations. These include local management presence, physical premises, and direct operational control.

Mid-Market Triggers To Move From EOR To Entity

Practical thresholds help identify when establishing a local entity becomes both strategically sound and regulatory necessary. Consider overall market commitment levels, required regulatory permissions, and cost efficiency curves as operations scale.

Headcount threshold of 10 quota carriers

Larger sales teams attract increased regulatory attention regarding governance frameworks, training programs, and supervision effectiveness. Beyond approximately 10 sales FTEs, some firms may find it increasingly challenging to demonstrate effective local management and maintain proper audit trails through EOR arrangements, depending on regulatory expectations.

This often pushes firms toward entity establishment to evidence direct oversight capabilities and meet regulator expectations for substantial local operations.

Annual payroll exceeding €2 million

Above approximately €2 million in annual payroll costs, EOR fees and fragmented administrative processes often exceed the total cost of operating a local entity with integrated control systems.

Higher payroll volumes also increase remuneration reporting complexity and create greater need for consistent deferral and clawback administration across the employee base.

Need for local client onboarding permissions

When sales activities evolve from marketing and lead generation to engaging in regulated activities—such as suitability assessments, order reception, or client onboarding—regulators typically expect permissions to be tied to the employing and supervising firm.

This requirement usually necessitates establishing a local entity or registered branch structure to maintain proper regulatory alignment.

Europe's Toughest Rules For Front-Office Hiring Explained

Each major European jurisdiction maintains specific requirements that can significantly impact hiring strategies and operational models for financial services firms.

United Kingdom FCA fit and proper tests

The Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR) applies broadly, with relevant sales roles potentially classified as Certified Persons or Senior Managers. Conduct Rules apply to most financial services employees.

Requirements include comprehensive fitness and propriety assessments, regulatory reference checks, criminal and credit background verification, and role-specific training completion. Approved roles require Form A submission via the FCA's Connect system.

Timeline considerations include 2-4 weeks for preparation activities such as screening and reference collection, followed by FCA assessment periods that can extend several weeks depending on role complexity and individual circumstances.

Ongoing obligations include annual certification processes, conduct breach reporting requirements, and remuneration code alignment for applicable roles.

Germany BaFin tied-agent requirements

Tied agents operate on behalf of licensed investment firms and must maintain proper registration while the principal firm bears full responsibility for supervision and compliance oversight.

Employment structures typically require individuals to operate within the supervising firm's direct control framework. Using contractor arrangements or third-party employers can create challenges for meeting oversight obligations.

Key obligations include written policy frameworks, comprehensive training programs, ongoing monitoring systems, complaints handling procedures, and communication recording where applicable. Agents must be listed in public regulatory registers.

France AMF registration for sales staff

Certain sales and advisory roles require AMF accreditation, particularly those involving investment advice (Conseiller en investissements financiers) and investment services activities.

The registration process requires employer attestation, thorough background screening, professional competence evidence, and completion of mandatory training programs.

Ongoing requirements include continuing education obligations, conduct standard adherence, remuneration control compliance, and documented supervision with regular monitoring activities.

Five Steps To Build A Compliant Cross-Border Sales Team

This sequenced approach provides clear deliverables, realistic timelines, and defined ownership for building compliant international sales operations.

1. Map licence obligations by role and market

Deliverable: Comprehensive role-by-role compliance matrix covering required activities, permission structures, and supervision frameworks.

Process: Confirm whether roles involve marketing, advisory, or onboarding activities. Identify firm-level versus individual approval requirements. Engage specialist legal counsel for complex jurisdictions or novel role structures.

Timeline and resources: 2-3 weeks with Legal/Compliance leadership and external advisory inputs.

2. Select the right employment model per country

Deliverable: Model selection memorandum for each target market, comparing contractor, EOR, and entity options aligned to regulatory activities and risk tolerance.

Process: Apply comparison criteria including regulatory fit, scaling horizon, cost implications, speed requirements, and local substance expectations.

Timeline and resources: 1-2 weeks with HR/Finance coordination and Compliance sign-off.

3. Localise incentive plans and claw backs

Deliverable: Country-specific bonus plan structures incorporating malus provisions, clawback mechanisms, deferral requirements, and ratio compliance.

Process: Align structures to FCA, CRD, and IFR requirements. Establish approval workflows and reporting mechanisms. Configure payroll and HRIS system fields to support complex compensation structures.

Timeline and resources: 3-4 weeks requiring Compensation, Legal, and Payroll team coordination.

4. Run background and regulatory checks

Deliverable: Complete screening documentation and regulator submission packages for each new hire.

Process: Obtain regulatory references, conduct criminal and credit background checks, complete fit-and-proper attestations, and prepare application forms with supporting evidence.

Timeline and resources: 2-6 weeks depending on jurisdiction complexity and role seniority levels.

5. Monitor rule changes with an advisory partner

Deliverable: Quarterly regulatory monitoring reports with impact assessments and recommended actions.

Process: Assign clear ownership responsibilities, subscribe to regulatory update services, and establish review cadence with external advisory partners. Update internal policies and compensation plans based on regulatory changes.

Timeline and resources: Ongoing quarterly review cycle with dedicated internal and external resources.

Hidden Cost Drivers, Bonuses, FX And Social Charges

Finance leaders need comprehensive budget planning that accounts for European regulatory complexity and operational variations.

Bonus cap variations across Europe: EU prudential regimes can impose variable-to-fixed compensation ratios and require deferral mechanisms. Planning must accommodate different caps and disclosure requirements by country and entity classification.

FX exposure on multi-currency payroll: Currency volatility can significantly impact net compensation levels and bonus fairness perceptions. Consider hedging strategies, functional currency alignment, and treasury workflow optimization for cross-border team management.

Social security surcharges in high-tax markets: Employer cost obligations vary dramatically across European markets, with countries like France, Italy, and Belgium imposing substantial additional charges. Total employer burden modeling should include mandatory benefits and sector-specific surcharges beyond base compensation levels.

How Teamed Advises Financial Services Firms In 180+ Countries

Teamed can support financial services firms by providing strategic guidance before operational execution, helping navigate the complex intersection of employment models and regulatory compliance across global markets.

Strategic counsel first, execution once clear

We can help map sales roles to regulatory permission requirements, evaluate employment model options per market, and design remuneration governance frameworks before establishing entities or implementing EOR arrangements.

This approach can support more informed decision-making and potentially reduce compliance risks during international expansion phases.

Fair and transparent pricing for growth stages

Our pricing structure often aligns with different scaling phases, aiming to avoid enterprise-level overhead while enabling multi-market compliance capabilities for mid-market firms.

Talk to the experts

Complex hiring decisions in regulated markets can benefit from strategic consultation. Talk to the experts to explore how Teamed might support your financial services expansion strategy.

FAQs About Hiring Regulated Sales Teams

What licences do individual salespeople need in each market?

Licence requirements vary significantly across European markets, with some requiring individual registrations whilst others permit supervision under firm licences. Strategic advisory support can help navigate these jurisdiction-specific requirements during hiring planning phases.

How long does an FCA approved person application take?

FCA approved person applications typically require several weeks for processing, depending on role complexity and individual circumstances. Planning ahead with regulatory timeline guidance can help prevent hiring delays.

Can I pay EU sales bonuses in USD?

Currency restrictions and reporting requirements vary across European markets, with some jurisdictions requiring local currency payments for regulatory compliance. Advisory guidance can help ensure compensation structures meet local requirements.

How much control does BaFin require for a tied agent?

BaFin requires substantial oversight and control mechanisms for tied agents, including compliance monitoring and management systems. These supervision obligations often influence employment model selection for German operations.

What is mid-market?

Mid-market companies typically range from 200-2,000 employees with revenue between £10 million to £1 billion, representing approximately 17% of total employment across Europe. These scaling businesses often need sophisticated employment guidance without enterprise-level complexity or cost structures.or

Financial Services Sales Hiring: Managing Compliance Risk For Mid-Market Companies

Building a revenue team across Europe sounds straightforward until you hit the reality of MiFID II, FCA fit-and-proper tests, and BaFin tied-agent requirements. What started as hiring a few quota-carrying salespeople in London and Frankfurt suddenly becomes a maze of individual registrations, bonus cap variations, and local substance rules that can derail your expansion timeline.

Mid-market financial services firms—those scaling from 200 to 2,000 employees—face a particularly challenging scenario. You're large enough to attract regulatory scrutiny but often lack the dedicated compliance resources that enterprise firms take for granted. One misstep in employment model selection or licensing requirements can trigger fines, restrict client onboarding permissions, or damage the investor confidence that fuels your growth trajectory.

Key Takeaways

Before diving into the complexities of regulated sales hiring, here are the strategic choices and outcomes that matter most for cross-border expansion:

  • Strategic hiring models compared in one place: Contractor, EOR, and local entity options mapped to regulatory risk, speed, and control requirements across European markets.
  • Mid-market triggers for switching from EOR to entity: Team size thresholds, payroll volume benchmarks, and client-onboarding permission needs that drive timing decisions.
  • Europe-specific licence and bonus rules decoded: FCA, BaFin, and AMF approval processes plus bonus cap variations that shape role design and compensation planning.
  • Five-step blueprint to hire fast without fines: Map obligations, select the right model per market, localise incentives, run regulatory checks, and monitor rule changes with expert guidance.

The Compliance Stakes Of Hiring Sales In Financial Services

Financial services sales roles often require regulated permissions and individual accountability under regimes such as the UK FCA, Germany's BaFin, and France's AMF. These frameworks govern who can market, advise, and onboard clients, and how firms supervise those individuals.

Mid-market companies expanding into multiple EU markets typically encounter fragmented rules on licensing, bonus caps, client communications, and reporting. This creates cumulative compliance exposure during rapid hiring phases when speed-to-market pressure is highest.

Consider a UK fintech opening Germany and France. They might face tied-agent supervision obligations in Germany while needing AMF registration for sales staff in France. A payments scale-up switching from EORs to entities could discover that local substance expectations require direct employment for client-facing teams, forcing a costly model transition mid-expansion.

Regulatory fines and licence loss

Breaches can trigger restrictions on activities, suspension, or revocation of permissions. This disrupts live sales pipelines, limits new client onboarding capabilities, and forces costly remediation efforts that can extend for months.

Licence issues often undermine distribution agreements and partner confidence, delaying market entry timelines and elongating sales cycles when revenue teams are already under pressure to deliver growth.

Brand damage and funding risk

Compliance incidents raise red flags during investor due diligence processes, potentially extending deal timelines and compressing valuation multiples at critical funding rounds.

Reputational damage reduces enterprise customer trust, increasing win-loss rates and adding procurement scrutiny that can double sales cycle lengths in competitive markets.

Contractor, EOR Or Entity, Which Model Fits A Regulated Sales Team?

Each employment model carries distinct regulatory implications, speed considerations, and compliance requirements that can significantly impact your expansion strategy.

Model Regulatory implications Speed to hire Compliance requirements
Contractor (freelancer) High misclassification risk for quota-carrying, supervised roles. Contractors often cannot hold required registrations under firm oversight, limiting their ability to conduct regulated activities. Fast initial setup, but potentially slow if regulators challenge employment status or permission structures. Limited employer controls make it difficult to enforce conduct rules, implement clawback provisions, and maintain required reporting standards.
EOR (Employer of Record) Provides employee status through a third party, which can work for supporting roles while potentially reducing administrative HR costs by 30-50%. For regulated front-office positions, requires careful mapping of supervision responsibilities and permission structures. Faster than entity establishment, with onboarding typically completed within weeks while regulatory approvals run in parallel. Requires documented supervision frameworks, conduct training programs, and aligned bonus and record-keeping systems. Some markets may still expect local substance for client-facing work.
Local entity (own subsidiary/branch) Offers the best alignment with supervision expectations, accountability frameworks, and local substance requirements. Enables direct registrations and streamlined regulatory reporting. Slowest initial setup due to entity establishment, payroll configuration, and registration processes, typically requiring 2-4 months. However, provides fastest long-term scaling for compliant operations. Full responsibility for regulatory reporting, remuneration governance, and oversight systems with direct control over all processes.

Misclassification and MiFID passporting

Quota-carrying sales roles with exclusivity arrangements, set working hours, and direct supervision typically indicate employment rather than contracting relationships. Misclassification can trigger tax penalties, social security obligations, and labour law violations.

MiFID II passporting for investment services often relies on firm-level permissions that extend across EU/EEA markets. Employment status matters because supervised individuals must operate within the permissioned firm's governance structure. Contractors outside this perimeter usually cannot conduct regulated activities under the firm's permissions.

Payroll and variable compensation controls

Regulated roles may require malus provisions, clawback mechanisms, and ratio caps on variable compensation. EOR providers may support these terms both contractually and operationally, while entities can integrate them directly into remuneration policies and regulatory reporting systems.

Reporting obligations vary significantly across jurisdictions. Some require detailed remuneration disclosure, risk alignment attestations, and individual employee tracking. Systems must capture award events, deferral periods, and clawback triggers to meet regulatory requirements.

Markets like the UK (SYSC/Remuneration Codes) and EU CRD/IFR regimes impose different structural requirements. Plan design and documentation must align with local frameworks on a market-by-market basis.

Speed to hire versus local substance rules

EOR arrangements can support early market testing and non-advisory prospecting activities while regulatory approvals progress through official channels, with providers typically completing onboarding within 7-21 days.

The shift to entity structures typically becomes necessary when client-facing onboarding, local oversight requirements, or rising headcount triggers substance expectations. These include local management presence, physical premises, and direct operational control.

Mid-Market Triggers To Move From EOR To Entity

Practical thresholds help identify when establishing a local entity becomes both strategically sound and regulatory necessary. Consider overall market commitment levels, required regulatory permissions, and cost efficiency curves as operations scale.

Headcount threshold of 10 quota carriers

Larger sales teams attract increased regulatory attention regarding governance frameworks, training programs, and supervision effectiveness. Beyond approximately 10 sales FTEs, some firms may find it increasingly challenging to demonstrate effective local management and maintain proper audit trails through EOR arrangements, depending on regulatory expectations.

This often pushes firms toward entity establishment to evidence direct oversight capabilities and meet regulator expectations for substantial local operations.

Annual payroll exceeding €2 million

Above approximately €2 million in annual payroll costs, EOR fees and fragmented administrative processes often exceed the total cost of operating a local entity with integrated control systems.

Higher payroll volumes also increase remuneration reporting complexity and create greater need for consistent deferral and clawback administration across the employee base.

Need for local client onboarding permissions

When sales activities evolve from marketing and lead generation to engaging in regulated activities—such as suitability assessments, order reception, or client onboarding—regulators typically expect permissions to be tied to the employing and supervising firm.

This requirement usually necessitates establishing a local entity or registered branch structure to maintain proper regulatory alignment.

Europe's Toughest Rules For Front-Office Hiring Explained

Each major European jurisdiction maintains specific requirements that can significantly impact hiring strategies and operational models for financial services firms.

United Kingdom FCA fit and proper tests

The Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR) applies broadly, with relevant sales roles potentially classified as Certified Persons or Senior Managers. Conduct Rules apply to most financial services employees.

Requirements include comprehensive fitness and propriety assessments, regulatory reference checks, criminal and credit background verification, and role-specific training completion. Approved roles require Form A submission via the FCA's Connect system.

Timeline considerations include 2-4 weeks for preparation activities such as screening and reference collection, followed by FCA assessment periods that can extend several weeks depending on role complexity and individual circumstances.

Ongoing obligations include annual certification processes, conduct breach reporting requirements, and remuneration code alignment for applicable roles.

Germany BaFin tied-agent requirements

Tied agents operate on behalf of licensed investment firms and must maintain proper registration while the principal firm bears full responsibility for supervision and compliance oversight.

Employment structures typically require individuals to operate within the supervising firm's direct control framework. Using contractor arrangements or third-party employers can create challenges for meeting oversight obligations.

Key obligations include written policy frameworks, comprehensive training programs, ongoing monitoring systems, complaints handling procedures, and communication recording where applicable. Agents must be listed in public regulatory registers.

France AMF registration for sales staff

Certain sales and advisory roles require AMF accreditation, particularly those involving investment advice (Conseiller en investissements financiers) and investment services activities.

The registration process requires employer attestation, thorough background screening, professional competence evidence, and completion of mandatory training programs.

Ongoing requirements include continuing education obligations, conduct standard adherence, remuneration control compliance, and documented supervision with regular monitoring activities.

Five Steps To Build A Compliant Cross-Border Sales Team

This sequenced approach provides clear deliverables, realistic timelines, and defined ownership for building compliant international sales operations.

1. Map licence obligations by role and market

Deliverable: Comprehensive role-by-role compliance matrix covering required activities, permission structures, and supervision frameworks.

Process: Confirm whether roles involve marketing, advisory, or onboarding activities. Identify firm-level versus individual approval requirements. Engage specialist legal counsel for complex jurisdictions or novel role structures.

Timeline and resources: 2-3 weeks with Legal/Compliance leadership and external advisory inputs.

2. Select the right employment model per country

Deliverable: Model selection memorandum for each target market, comparing contractor, EOR, and entity options aligned to regulatory activities and risk tolerance.

Process: Apply comparison criteria including regulatory fit, scaling horizon, cost implications, speed requirements, and local substance expectations.

Timeline and resources: 1-2 weeks with HR/Finance coordination and Compliance sign-off.

3. Localise incentive plans and claw backs

Deliverable: Country-specific bonus plan structures incorporating malus provisions, clawback mechanisms, deferral requirements, and ratio compliance.

Process: Align structures to FCA, CRD, and IFR requirements. Establish approval workflows and reporting mechanisms. Configure payroll and HRIS system fields to support complex compensation structures.

Timeline and resources: 3-4 weeks requiring Compensation, Legal, and Payroll team coordination.

4. Run background and regulatory checks

Deliverable: Complete screening documentation and regulator submission packages for each new hire.

Process: Obtain regulatory references, conduct criminal and credit background checks, complete fit-and-proper attestations, and prepare application forms with supporting evidence.

Timeline and resources: 2-6 weeks depending on jurisdiction complexity and role seniority levels.

5. Monitor rule changes with an advisory partner

Deliverable: Quarterly regulatory monitoring reports with impact assessments and recommended actions.

Process: Assign clear ownership responsibilities, subscribe to regulatory update services, and establish review cadence with external advisory partners. Update internal policies and compensation plans based on regulatory changes.

Timeline and resources: Ongoing quarterly review cycle with dedicated internal and external resources.

Hidden Cost Drivers, Bonuses, FX And Social Charges

Finance leaders need comprehensive budget planning that accounts for European regulatory complexity and operational variations.

Bonus cap variations across Europe: EU prudential regimes can impose variable-to-fixed compensation ratios and require deferral mechanisms. Planning must accommodate different caps and disclosure requirements by country and entity classification.

FX exposure on multi-currency payroll: Currency volatility can significantly impact net compensation levels and bonus fairness perceptions. Consider hedging strategies, functional currency alignment, and treasury workflow optimization for cross-border team management.

Social security surcharges in high-tax markets: Employer cost obligations vary dramatically across European markets, with countries like France, Italy, and Belgium imposing substantial additional charges. Total employer burden modeling should include mandatory benefits and sector-specific surcharges beyond base compensation levels.

How Teamed Advises Financial Services Firms In 180+ Countries

Teamed can support financial services firms by providing strategic guidance before operational execution, helping navigate the complex intersection of employment models and regulatory compliance across global markets.

Strategic counsel first, execution once clear

We can help map sales roles to regulatory permission requirements, evaluate employment model options per market, and design remuneration governance frameworks before establishing entities or implementing EOR arrangements.

This approach can support more informed decision-making and potentially reduce compliance risks during international expansion phases.

Fair and transparent pricing for growth stages

Our pricing structure often aligns with different scaling phases, aiming to avoid enterprise-level overhead while enabling multi-market compliance capabilities for mid-market firms.

Talk to the experts

Complex hiring decisions in regulated markets can benefit from strategic consultation. Talk to the experts to explore how Teamed might support your financial services expansion strategy.

FAQs About Hiring Regulated Sales Teams

What licences do individual salespeople need in each market?

Licence requirements vary significantly across European markets, with some requiring individual registrations whilst others permit supervision under firm licences. Strategic advisory support can help navigate these jurisdiction-specific requirements during hiring planning phases.

How long does an FCA approved person application take?

FCA approved person applications typically require several weeks for processing, depending on role complexity and individual circumstances. Planning ahead with regulatory timeline guidance can help prevent hiring delays.

Can I pay EU sales bonuses in USD?

Currency restrictions and reporting requirements vary across European markets, with some jurisdictions requiring local currency payments for regulatory compliance. Advisory guidance can help ensure compensation structures meet local requirements.

How much control does BaFin require for a tied agent?

BaFin requires substantial oversight and control mechanisms for tied agents, including compliance monitoring and management systems. These supervision obligations often influence employment model selection for German operations.

What is mid-market?

Mid-market companies typically range from 200-2,000 employees with revenue between £10 million to £1 billion, representing approximately 17% of total employment across Europe. These scaling businesses often need sophisticated employment guidance without enterprise-level complexity or cost structures.or

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Take a look
at the latest articles