The Ultimate Guide to Global People Strategy for Mid-Market Companies with RPO and EoR

Building a global team can feel like navigating a maze blindfolded. One day you're celebrating your first hire in Germany, the next you're panicking about French labour laws you've never heard of. Meanwhile, your board is asking pointed questions about your "global people strategy," and you're not entirely sure what that means beyond "hire good people everywhere."

Here's the reality: a global people strategy isn't just about finding talent across borders. It's about creating a coherent plan for how you hire, employ, and manage people across countries while balancing growth speed with compliance confidence. Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO) and Employer of Record (EoR) services can be powerful tools within that strategy, but only when you understand how they fit together and when to use each one.

Key Takeaways

A global people strategy is your joined-up plan for hiring, employing, and managing people across countries. RPO and EoR are tools within that plan, not ends in themselves.

Mid-market companies (200-2,000 employees) often hire across five or more countries and face fragmented compliance decisions without unified strategic guidance. This challenge is increasingly common, with over 60% of small to mid-sized enterprises adopting EoR solutions to manage tax, legal, and payroll risks across borders.

RPO strengthens your global recruitment strategy and talent acquisition capabilities. EoR enables compliant employment where no local entity exists.

Real value comes from matching contractors, EoR, or entities to each country and growth stage, guided by independent advice rather than vendor sales pitches.

Europe requires particularly careful compliance and entity decisions due to strong worker protections and complex regulatory frameworks.

What A Global People Strategy Is And How RPO And EoR Fit

Your global people strategy is the master plan for managing employees across different countries. It covers everything from workforce planning and hiring to onboarding, development, and eventually saying goodbye, all while keeping your business goals and risk appetite in mind.

Think of it as the blueprint that answers: Where will we hire? How will we employ people in each market? What compliance risks are we willing to accept? How do we maintain consistency while respecting local requirements?

RPO (Recruitment Process Outsourcing) is when an external partner manages part or all of your recruitment process, from sourcing candidates to making offers and sometimes onboarding. They act as an extension of your talent team, often bringing specialised expertise in specific markets or roles.

EoR (Employer of Record) is when a third party becomes the legal employer, handling payroll, contracts, and compliance while you direct the day-to-day work. It's one form of global EoR services that enables you to employ people without establishing a local entity.

Think of these as complementary tools, not competitors. They're different parts of the same global recruitment and employment system. RPO's primary purpose is managing the recruitment process, with you remaining the legal employer (via entity or EoR). EoR's primary purpose is managing the employment relationship, with the third-party provider becoming the legal employer.

Consider a mid-market SaaS company expanding across Europe. They might use RPO for international recruitment to build consistent pipelines across markets, then employ those hires through EoR in countries where they don't have entities. This approach can help them test markets quickly while maintaining compliance with European labour laws, which can be particularly strict about ad hoc hiring arrangements.

Teamed often works with companies to map which model makes sense in which country, keeping decisions strategy-led rather than vendor-led.

How RPO And EoR Together Drive Global Growth For Mid-Market Companies

Use RPO and EoR strategically and you'll enter new markets faster, worry less about compliance, and give your board the clear cost projections they love.

RPO elevates your global talent acquisition strategy by bringing expanded sourcing reach in new markets, consistent employer branding across countries, improved candidate experience and communication, and standardised international onboarding processes.

EoR enables cross-border hiring and global hiring compliance by providing legal employment where no entity exists, local payroll and benefits administration, compliance with country-specific labour laws, and simplified exit strategies if market entry doesn't work.

Put them together and you've got a winning formula: RPO finds great people, EoR employs them compliantly. This combo works especially well when you want to test the waters in Europe or APAC without spending months and money setting up legal entities. In fact, EoR platforms have accelerated global hiring speed by 52% while improving compliance tracking.

Your CFO and VP People will love this model because it delivers predictable costs (EoR fees are typically fixed monthly amounts versus uncertain entity establishment and ongoing compliance costs), known recruiting capacity (RPO provides dedicated recruitment resources without adding permanent headcount), faster market entry (you can start hiring within weeks rather than months), and risk mitigation (both models transfer specific compliance responsibilities to specialised providers).

As one of our clients recently told us: "Our board doesn't care whether someone is on EoR or an entity. They care that we can show a defensible choice between the options and explain our rationale to auditors."

For a 200-2,000 employee firm entering Germany or France, this might look like: RPO builds the candidate pipeline while EoR employs the first few hires. This gives you time to assess market traction before making entity establishment decisions.

Choosing Between Contractors EoR And Entities In Global Hiring

Know when to use contractors, EoR, or entities and you'll strike the right balance between risk, control, timing, and cost.

Contractors are independent workers who invoice for services. They offer flexibility and speed but carry misclassification risk if the work relationship looks employee-like to local authorities.

EoR provides flexible employment where no entity exists. It's well-suited for medium-term or strategic roles where you need employee-level control and loyalty.

Local entities are full subsidiaries offering maximum control and brand presence. They require setup effort, ongoing governance, and dedicated compliance management.

When comparing these options: contractors remain self-employed and can be hired within days with limited control but high misclassification risk, best suited for project work. EoR uses the EoR provider as legal employer, takes 1-2 weeks to hire with high control and low misclassification risk, best suited for strategic roles. Entities make your company the legal employer, take months to set up with maximum control and no misclassification risk, best suited for long-term presence.

Decision criteria typically include expected duration of the relationship, anticipated headcount per country, regulatory risk tolerance, strategic importance of the market, and internal compliance capacity.

Teamed often recommends a graduation path: start with contractors for project-based work, move to EoR for critical roles requiring employee-level engagement, then establish entities when you reach scale and stability.

Use contractors when work is genuinely project-based or short-term, you need specific expertise for defined deliverables, and local laws clearly permit independent contractor relationships.

Use EoR when you need 1-10+ employees in a country, the role requires medium to long-term commitment, and you want compliant employment without entity complexity.

Use an entity when you're committed to long-term market presence, you expect significant local headcount growth, and customer or regulatory requirements favour local employers.

In Europe, this decision framework becomes particularly important. Some European countries treat long-term contractors as employees by default, creating back-pay and penalty risks. For example, you might use contractors for short-term projects in the Netherlands while employing permanent staff through EoR in Germany as you assess entity establishment timing.

When Mid-Market Companies Should Use RPO In Global Recruitment Strategy

RPO can take different forms, from full recruitment outsourcing to project-based support for specific regions or role families.

Signs you might need RPO include recurring hiring bottlenecks across multiple countries, difficulty sourcing candidates for niche or technical roles, inconsistent candidate experience between markets, unpredictable agency spend without strategic oversight, weak employer brand in key target markets, and internal recruitment team stretched thin by growth demands.

RPO isn't just another recruitment agency. It's an embedded partnership where they share your processes, technology, and success metrics. Instead of one-off placements, RPO providers help you build better employer branding and communicate with candidates at scale.

How RPO plays nicely with EoR and entities: RPO sources candidates in new markets where early employment happens through EoR, RPO partners with your local entities where they exist to maintain consistent processes, and RPO can help you test market demand before committing to permanent local recruitment teams.

Consider a mid-market technology company hiring engineers and sales professionals across Europe and North America. Project RPO might help stabilise their hiring in the UK, Germany, and France while they build internal capacity in their home market.

We'll help you figure out if you actually need RPO or if tweaking your processes or employment models would solve your hiring headaches better.

Make sure RPO strengthens your overall global people strategy. Don't let it become an expensive patch for deeper strategic problems.

When Mid-Market Companies Should Use EoR Instead Of Local Entities

Choosing between EoR and setting up an entity usually boils down to three things: timing, scale, and how committed you are to that market.

Why EoR makes sense: rapid hiring capability (often within 1-2 weeks), with EoR platforms reducing onboarding time by 41% compared to traditional methods, simplified compliance management, easier market exit or downsizing if needed, predictable monthly costs, and no requirement for local legal entity management.

When EoR works best: first few hires in a new country, testing product-market fit with local talent, project-based or time-limited market presence, and markets where entity establishment is complex or expensive.

When it's time to open your own entity: long-term commitment to the market (typically 3+ years), expected local headcount growth (often 10+ employees), customer or regulatory requirements for local employer presence, and desire for maximum control over employment terms and branding.

EoR might not always save you money per employee, but you'll know exactly what you're paying and face fewer risks early on. Set clear checkpoints to review when switching to an entity makes financial sense.

We regularly help clients build country-specific roadmaps with clear triggers (like headcount, revenue, or time milestones) for when to revisit the entity question.

Europe makes this decision even trickier. Setting up entities means dealing with heavy admin, and countries like France and Italy have works councils and strict labour laws to navigate. Starting with EoR lets you learn the local employment rules before diving into direct compliance responsibilities.

Questions to ask every year about each EoR country: Are we still treating this as a market test, or have we committed to long-term presence? Has our local headcount reached a threshold where entity economics make sense? Do our local customers or partners expect us to have a local legal presence? Are there regulatory or tax advantages to establishing an entity? Do we have the internal capacity to manage local compliance and governance?

Managing Compliance Risk In Europe With EoR And Local Entities

European employment law can be particularly complex, with strong worker protections and significant variation between countries.

Watch out for these European compliance risks: strong worker protection laws with extensive notice periods and severance requirements, collective bargaining agreements that may apply automatically, mandatory benefits and social security contributions, strict working time and holiday regulations, and data privacy requirements under GDPR.

Don't forget about contractor misclassification rules that vary significantly between countries, permanent establishment risk if local activities exceed certain thresholds, and works councils and employee representation requirements in larger operations.

How EoR keeps you compliant in Europe: in-country legal expertise manages contracts and benefits, local specialists handle regulatory changes and compliance updates, established relationships with local authorities and benefits providers, and clear separation between your business operations and employment obligations.

Once you set up European entities, compliance and governance responsibilities move in-house. You need clear ownership for HR, payroll, and legal obligations per country. Regular monitoring of regulatory changes becomes your responsibility. Works councils and employee representation may become relevant at scale.

When using EoR in Europe, the EoR owns contract compliance, tracks regulatory changes, and provides a simplified exit process. When using a local entity in Europe, you own contract compliance, track regulatory changes yourself, and face complex closure procedures.

We'll help you figure out which European markets work better with EoR versus entities, and guide you through moving employees over when you're ready to level up.

Consider Germany and France, both with high employee protections and complex regulatory frameworks. Many mid-market firms rely on a single internal counsel without local employment law specialists. EoR can provide that local expertise while you focus on building your business.

Building A Scalable Global People Operating Model For Companies With 200 To 2,000 Employees

Your operating model brings together all the moving parts: processes, technology, vendors, and governance structures that handle everything from workforce planning to recruitment, onboarding, payroll, performance reviews, and offboarding across different countries.

Why fragmentation occurs: multiple EoR providers with different processes and systems, separate local payroll systems that don't integrate, inconsistent recruitment approaches between markets, and ad hoc vendor selection without strategic oversight.

When things get fragmented, you end up with compliance holes, wasted money, and frustrated employees.

What goes into a unified model: one strategic advisor who understands your entire global footprint, a core EoR partner for markets where you don't have entities, clear contractor guidelines and approval processes, standardised onboarding experience across employment models and countries, and integrated technology that provides visibility across all markets.

Who owns what: People team owns strategy and vendor relationships, Finance team owns cost management and entity decisions, Legal team owns compliance oversight and risk assessment, with clear escalation paths for complex situations.

At different lifecycle stages, ownership and tools vary: workforce planning is owned by People and Finance using HRIS and forecasting tools across all employment models. Recruitment is owned by People and RPO using ATS and RPO partners across all models. Onboarding is owned by People, EoR, and Entity using HRIS and local systems for EoR or entity employment. Payroll is owned by Finance, EoR, and Entity using payroll systems for EoR or entity employment. Offboarding is owned by People and Legal using HRIS and local compliance across all models.

What usually goes wrong: multiple systems requiring duplicate data entry, inconsistent employee experience between countries, unclear ownership when issues arise, and difficulty getting consolidated reporting across markets.

What good looks like: single source of truth for all employee data, consistent processes with local flexibility where needed, clear vendor accountability and performance metrics, and streamlined reporting for board and audit purposes.

We regularly audit operating models to spot where your current RPO and EoR setup helps or hurts your strategy. Then we design something simpler that actually scales.

If you're a typical mid-market company operating in the UK, Germany, Netherlands, and some non-European markets, you probably need one global framework that bends for local needs without breaking your overall strategy.

Designing Global Talent Acquisition Strategy Across 180 Countries

Your talent acquisition strategy needs to match your employment models, scale globally, and still respect what makes each local market unique.

The essentials: workforce planning that anticipates hiring needs by market and role, employer branding that translates across cultures while maintaining consistency, sourcing strategies adapted to local talent markets and preferences, assessment processes that comply with local employment laws, offer management that reflects local employment models and benefits, and smooth handover to onboarding and employment operations.

How to prioritise: Which roles and markets are most critical to business success? How do contractor, EoR, and entity models shape candidate expectations? What local compliance requirements affect your recruitment process?

Keeping the candidate experience consistent: clear communication about legal employer and employment model, transparent benefits and compensation information, consistent interview and assessment processes, and smooth transition from recruitment to onboarding.

Staying flexible by region: European markets may require local language capabilities and cultural alignment. Some emerging markets may need more education about remote or hybrid work arrangements. Regulatory requirements can affect how you collect candidate information and conduct assessments.

For each component of talent acquisition, consider key questions and the impact of employment model. For sourcing, ask where you find talent and note that EoR may limit some benefits offerings. For assessment, ask how you evaluate fairly and note that local laws affect permissible questions. For onboarding, ask how you integrate new hires and note that different systems exist for EoR versus entity employment.

We'll help you line up your employment models with how you position yourself to talent. That way, you can actually deliver on what you promise during hiring. Happy candidates stick around longer.

Most mid-market companies start by rolling out in their priority European markets first. Then they tweak the approach for other regions based on what worked and what didn't.

Using Project RPO And Global EOR Services To Tackle Recruitment Challenges

Project RPO gives you a focused solution for specific hiring pushes that also feeds valuable insights into your long-term global people strategy.

Project RPO is a time-limited or scope-limited engagement designed for specific initiatives like regional sales expansion, product launch hiring, or clearing recruitment backlogs.

Problems it solves: low brand awareness in new markets, limited internal screening and assessment capacity, multi-country launch coordination, seasonal or cyclical hiring surges, and specialised skill requirements in specific markets.

Combining project RPO with EoR: RPO builds candidate pipeline and manages recruitment process, EoR provides compliant employment for successful hires, combined approach enables market testing before long-term commitments, and lessons learned inform decisions about permanent recruitment teams and entity establishment.

When this combo really shines: new country launch (use project RPO to hire initial sales team via EoR before deciding on entity establishment), product line scale-up (rapidly hire engineering team across multiple countries for new product development), and seasonal expansion (handle temporary increases in customer support or sales capacity).

Consider a company entering the German market with an aggressive sales hiring plan. Project RPO can help them hire 5-8 sales professionals over six months, with EoR handling employment while they assess market traction and entity establishment timing.

For different challenges, project RPO and EoR play distinct roles. For new market entry, project RPO handles local sourcing and branding while EoR provides compliant employment. For skills shortages, project RPO manages specialised recruitment while EoR handles benefits and retention. For rapid scaling, project RPO provides process and capacity while EoR manages legal and administrative requirements.

We'll help you define the right scope for project RPO, set up governance that works, and capture insights that make your overall global people strategy stronger.

Make sure your project-based solutions teach you something valuable. Don't let them turn into expensive experiments that lead nowhere.

Governance Metrics And ROI For RPO And EoR In Mid-Market Companies

Good governance helps you prove value and keep the board happy without drowning in metrics and reports.

How to structure governance: clear ownership across People, Finance, and Legal teams, regular review meetings (monthly or quarterly) to assess performance, documented decision-making criteria for model selection and vendor changes, and audit-ready documentation for compliance and strategic rationale.

RPO metrics worth tracking: time to hire compared to internal baseline, candidate satisfaction scores and feedback, hiring manager satisfaction with quality and process, cost per hire versus previous agency or internal costs, and offer acceptance rates and early retention.

EoR metrics to watch: time to onboard new employees, payroll accuracy and processing timeliness, number and severity of compliance queries or issues, total cost of employment compared to entity projections at scale, and employee satisfaction with benefits and support.

Measuring your return includes quantitative measures (direct cost savings, reduced time to productivity, avoided compliance penalties) and qualitative measures (reduced compliance anxiety, fewer internal distractions, confident market entry and exit options).

How AI and tech can help: monitor regulatory changes across markets, identify patterns in recruitment or employment data, surface potential compliance risks or cost anomalies, and automate routine reporting and documentation.

But remember, you need experienced advisors to make sense of what AI tells you and craft the final strategy. Technology supports decisions, but complex employment strategy still needs human wisdom. While over 70% of RPO providers now use AI-based technologies to optimize candidate sourcing and screening, complex employment strategy still needs human wisdom.

Different stakeholders care about different things. The VP People cares about quality and efficiency, tracking metrics like time to hire and candidate satisfaction. The CFO cares about cost and predictability, tracking cost per hire and total employment cost. The Head of Legal cares about compliance and risk, tracking compliance incidents and audit readiness.

In Europe, you'll need tighter governance and crystal-clear documentation of your RPO spending and EoR usage by country. Your board and regulators will thank you.

How Teamed Advises On Global People Strategy For Regulated Industries

We specialise in helping mid-market companies in regulated industries build global people strategies that actually make sense, without the usual growing pains and operational mess.

Our focus: Mid-market firms (200-2,000 employees) in regulated sectors like financial services, healthcare, defence, and technology, where employment decisions carry material compliance weight and strategic consequences.

How we work: map the right mix of contractors, EoR, and entities for each country based on your growth trajectory and risk tolerance, provide deep European expertise, including works councils, sector-specific regulations, and cross-border compliance requirements, and combine strategic counsel with operational execution so you can implement decisions quickly and confidently.

What you get: strategic guidance on employment model selection before you commit to expensive decisions, execution capabilities across 180+ countries with in-market legal expertise informing every recommendation, unified advisory relationship that evolves with you from contractors to EOR to entities, and 24/5 access to specialists when complex situations arise.

What our clients typically achieve: strategic clarity on entity establishment timing and jurisdiction selection, consolidated vendor relationships that reduce complexity and improve accountability, defensible compliance posture that satisfies auditors and board members, and faster, lower-risk market testing and expansion.

As one client recently told us: "Teamed doesn't just execute our decisions - they help us make better decisions in the first place. That's the difference between a vendor and an advisor."

From our London headquarters, we bring legal expertise spanning 180+ countries and have guided over 1,000 companies through their global employment challenges. Companies stick with us because they value the partnership, not just the services.

If you're looking for independent guidance rather than vendor sales pitches, you can talk to the experts and discover how strategic employment advisory can support your growth without the compliance anxiety.

Frequently Asked Questions About Global People Strategy With RPO And EoR

How do we combine RPO and EoR in different regions without confusing managers and candidates?

Create one global playbook that spells out when RPO handles hiring and when EoR manages employment. Give managers and candidates simple templates that explain who does what and who the legal employer is in each country. Clear, consistent messaging prevents confusion before it starts.

How should we plan the transition from EoR employees to local entities?

Take it step by step: run legal and tax reviews, tell employees what's changing, prepare new contracts, and sync up timing with your EoR provider. Line everything up with payroll cycles and audit needs for smooth sailing. With good planning, most transitions wrap up in just 1-2 pay periods.

When does an entity become more efficient than EoR in European countries?

It depends on how many people you'll hire, how long you're staying, and local regulations. Most mid-market companies review this quarterly or twice a year to check if they've hit the scale and commitment level that justifies an entity. The rough rule of thumb? 10+ employees with a 3+ year horizon often tips the scales, though every country is different.

How do we present our global people strategy to investors and the board?

Connect the dots between your employment choices and your growth goals, risk management, and cost control. Show simple visuals that map out where you're using RPO, EoR, contractors, and entities, explaining why each makes sense. Keep the focus on strategic wins, not operational weeds.

How should finance and legal be involved in global people strategy decisions?

Bring them in early, especially when you're entering new markets, choosing EoR providers, or thinking about entities. Set up regular meetings where People, Finance, and Legal review employment decisions together using agreed criteria. This stops last-minute surprises and keeps everyone on the same page.

What is mid-market?

Usually companies with 200-2,000 employees or about £10m-£1bn in revenue. They're big enough to need serious global employment help but haven't reached the enterprise scale where they have dedicated international HR teams.

How can AI support global employment decisions without replacing human judgment?

AI is great at spotting regulatory changes, finding risk patterns in your employment data, and organizing information to help you decide. But you still need experienced advisors to interpret what it all means and craft your strategy. Complex employment decisions require understanding business context, regulatory subtleties, and strategic trade-offs that AI just can't handle yet.

‍