Ultimate CFO Guide: Board Packs for Mid-Market Expansion 2025

Your board wants to approve the German entity. They're just waiting for you to prove you've thought through what happens when payroll goes wrong at 11pm on a Friday, or when the Finanzamt sends a compliance notice you don't understand.

This guide walks you through exactly what CFOs present to secure entity approval without delays, from strategic rationale and five year P&L models to permanent establishment traps and director liability clauses that keep board members awake at night. You'll see the documentation boards expect, the mistakes that trigger endless follow-up questions, and how mid-market companies navigate the CapEx vs OpEx decision when expanding across Europe.

Key Takeaways

What a Board Pack Means for Mid-Market Expansion

A board pack is the comprehensive documentation set that CFOs present to secure approval for significant business decisions in this case, establishing legal entities in new markets. For mid-market companies scaling from 200 to 2,000 employees, expansion mistakes at this stage are expensive to reverse.

The board expects a complete picture: why this market, why now, what it costs, what could go wrong, and how you'll execute. You're not selling a vision, you're presenting a risk-adjusted business case that demonstrates you've thought through the operational reality of running payroll, managing compliance, and employing people under foreign labour law.

Mid-market boards often include investors or advisors without deep operational experience in international expansion. They'll approve what feels rigorous and reject what feels rushed. Your board pack bridges that gap.

Core Documents the Board Expects Before Approving a New Entity

The difference between a board pack that gets approved in one meeting versus one that triggers endless follow up questions comes down to completeness. Boards don't want to discover risks later, they want to see you've already identified and planned for them.

1. Strategic Rationale One-Pager

Start with the commercial justification. Why does this market matter to revenue growth, and why does it require a legal entity rather than contractors or EOR arrangements?

For a professional services firm expanding into Germany, this might include access to a talent pool of 500,000 engineers, proximity to three major clients representing £12 million in pipeline, and competitive pressure from rivals already established locally. Include the hiring plan, how many employees in year one, what roles, and what revenue they'll support.

The board cares about whether this entity accelerates growth or simply adds operational complexity. Make that distinction clear.

2. Country Specific Compliance Statement

This section addresses the regulatory obligations you're taking on. In Germany, that includes works council requirements once you hit certain employee thresholds, co-determination laws, and strict termination procedures. In Ireland, it's statutory director rules and personal liability for directors if payroll taxes aren't remitted correctly.

For defence or financial services companies, compliance gets more complex. You'll want to address data residency requirements, security clearances for local staff, and sector specific licensing. A UK-based defence contractor setting up in Germany, for instance, faces ITAR compliance, German export control laws, and NATO security protocols.

The board wants confidence you understand what you're signing up for, and that you've budgeted for the legal and compliance resources to manage it.

3. Five-Year P&L and Cash-Flow Model

Present the financial reality in GBP or Euros, broken down by setup costs, ongoing operational expenses, and revenue contribution. The board wants to see when this entity becomes cash-flow positive and what assumptions underpin that timeline.

‍

Include sensitivity analysis. What happens if hiring takes three months longer than planned? What if the first client deal slips? Boards appreciate CFOs who've stress-tested their assumptions.

4. Risk Register and Mitigations

Every international expansion carries risk. The board expects you to name them and explain how you'll manage them.

For financial services firms, regulatory risk includes licensing delays that prevent you from operating. Mitigation means beginning the licensing process in parallel with entity setup, not after.

5. Implementation Roadmap

Boards want a realistic timeline from approval to operational readiness.

‍

Mention your onboarding capability. If you're using a partner with 24-hour onboarding, that accelerates hiring once the entity is live. If you're building everything in-house, factor in recruitment time for local HR and finance staff.

Mid-Market Financial Model CapEx vs OpEx Comparison

The entity vs EOR decision fundamentally shapes your financial model and risk profile. Traditional entity setup is a CapEx-heavy approach, you're building infrastructure upfront. EOR is OpEx, you're paying for flexibility and speed.

For mid-market CFOs, this trade-off matters because boards scrutinise capital allocation. Spending £100,000 to set up an entity in Germany makes sense if you're hiring 20+ employees and staying for years. It's harder to justify for an experimental market entry with three employees.

Germany Sample Cost Stack

Setting up a GmbH (limited liability company) in Germany costs approximately £45,000-£65,000 in year one, broken down as follows:

Ongoing annual costs include statutory audits (£15,000-£20,000), tax filings (£8,000-£12,000), and compliance management. Add local HR and finance staff if you're managing payroll in-house, typically another £60,000-£80,000 per year.

Compare that to EOR: £400-£450 per employee per month, or approximately £48,000-£54,000 annually for 10 employees. EOR arrangements typically require less upfront capital and may reduce the need for statutory audits or permanent infrastructure.

Singapore Sample Cost Stack

Singapore offers faster setup, typically 4-6 weeks, but comes with different cost structures. Entity registration runs £6,000-£9,000, but you'll want a local registered address (£3,000-£5,000 annually) and a resident director if your board doesn't include one (£12,000-£18,000 annually).

Employment Pass requirements add complexity. If your hires don't qualify for passes, common in early-stage operations, you'll want EOR arrangements anyway, negating the entity's purpose.

The trade-off here is speed and simplicity versus control. Singapore's regulatory environment is transparent, but the operational overhead for a three-person team often doesn't justify entity setup.

SaaS vs Financial Services Sensitivity

Industry matters significantly. A SaaS company hiring engineers in Germany faces standard employment law and relatively straightforward compliance. Setup costs and timelines fall on the lower end of ranges.

Financial services firms face materially higher costs. Licensing requirements in Germany can take 6-12 months and cost £100,000+ in legal and advisory fees. You'll want local compliance officers, regulatory reporting systems, and potentially MiFID II or GDPR-specific controls before you can operate.

Defence contractors face even longer timelines due to security clearances and export control approvals. One defence spent 18 months establishing their German entity because NATO security protocols required facility inspections and personnel vetting before operations could begin.

Factor industry specific variables into your board pack. The board wants to understand why your timeline or costs might differ from a standard playbook.

Permanent Establishment and Other European Compliance Traps

Permanent establishment (PE) risk is the tax landmine most mid-market companies don't see coming, with German courts ruling in 2024 that even a shared office with a lockable drawer can trigger PE status.

The threshold varies by country, but common triggers include having employees working in-country for extended periods, maintaining an office or fixed place of business, or conducting sales activities that create "dependent agent" status. Germany and France are particularly aggressive in PE enforcement.

Germany Payroll Tax Thresholds

Germany's 183 day rule creates PE risk if contractorsGermany's 183 day rule creates PE risk if contractors or employees spend more than 183 days working in Germany within any 12 month period. Even if they're employed by your UK entity, their physical presence can trigger German tax obligations.

Once triggered, you're liable for German corporate income tax, trade tax, and employer social security contributions retroactively. We've seen companies face €200,000+ in unexpected liabilities because they didn't track employee days carefully.

Mitigation starts with day-tracking systems and clear policies on business travel, noting that home offices generally don't create PE unless the employer controls the premises.

If you're planning extended work in Germany, EOR arrangements can help reduce some permanent establishment (PE) risks by establishing a local employment relationship. However, PE exposure depends on the specific business activities and how local tax authorities interpret your presence.

Ireland Statutory Directors Rules

Irish law requires every company to have at least one director who is resident in the European Economic Area. If you're a UK company post-Brexit, this means appointing an Irish or EU-resident director or posting a €25,000 bond.

The catch: Irish directors face personal liability for unpaid payroll taxes and social security contributions. If your company fails to remit PAYE correctly, Revenue can pursue directors personally. This isn't theoretical, Revenue actively enforces director liability, and we've seen directors face five-figure personal assessments.

The solution involves either appointing a professional director service (£12,000-£18,000 annually) or ensuring your finance team has bulletproof payroll controls and director indemnity insurance. Your board pack might want to address this explicitly boards don't like surprises about personal liability.

Spain Labour-Council Obligations

Spain requires works councils (comités de empresa) once you reach 50 employees, with elected employee representatives who are consulted on major business decisions including restructuring, working conditions changes, and redundancies.

This fundamentally changes your operational flexibility. Decisions that take days in the UK can take months in Spain due to consultation requirements. Terminations become significantly more complex and expensive, statutory redundancy payments can reach 33 days' pay per year of service, and unfair dismissal claims are common.

For mid-market companies used to UK employment flexibility, Spain's labour protections feel restrictive. Your board wants to understand this before approving entity setup, particularly if the growth plan involves rapid scaling and potential restructuring.

Step-By-Step Timeline From Board Sign-Off to First Payroll

Once the board approves your entity setup, execution speed determines when you can actually hire. Mid-market CFOs often underestimate how long administrative processes take particularly in European jurisdictions where government agencies operate on their own timelines.

Here's the realistic sequence for a German entity setup, assuming no major complications.

1. Board Resolution Filing

Your board resolution approving the entity gets formally documented and, in some jurisdictions, notarised. In Germany, the notary reviews your articles of association, verifies identity documents for directors, and files with the commercial register (Handelsregister).

This typically takes 1-2 weeks but can stretch to 4 weeks if documents require translation or if the notary's schedule is full. Budget £5,000-£8,000 for notary fees and translations.

2. Bank Account Opening

You can't complete entity registration without depositing share capital, which requires a German bank account. German banks are notoriously slow to open accounts for foreign companies, expect 3-6 weeks and extensive due diligence.

They'll request corporate documents, proof of business activity, director identification, and often a face to face meeting in Germany. For financial services or defence companies, add another 2-4 weeks for enhanced due diligence.

Some CFOs try to accelerate this by using international banks with German operations (HSBC, Barclays), but even those take 4+ weeks. Factor this into your timeline it's often the critical path item.

3. Statutory Registrations

Once your entity is registered and capitalised, you'll want tax numbers, VAT registration, and social security registrations. In Germany, this involves the Finanzamt (tax office), Berufsgenossenschaft (accident insurance), and Krankenkasse (health insurance).

Each registration can take 2-4 weeks, though some can proceed in parallel. You can't run payroll until completion, attempting to do so creates compliance violations and potential penalties.

Engage local accountants or payroll specialists who know the process. Trying to navigate German bureaucracy from London without local expertise typically doubles the timeline.

4. First Employee Contract

German employment contracts require specific clauses around working time, holiday entitlement, notice periods, and data protection. Standard UK contracts won't comply with German law, you'll want localised templates reviewed by German employment lawyers.

Contracts get provided in German (English versions are supplementary) and include works council notification clauses even if you don't yet have a works council. Budget £2,000-£3,000 per contract for legal review if you're drafting your first German contracts.

5. Payroll Go Live

Your first payroll run requires all statutory registrations complete, employment contracts signed, and payroll systems configured with German tax and social security rules. German payroll is complex mit includes income tax, solidarity surcharge, church tax (if applicable), and multiple social security contributions.

Errors in first payrolls are common and create compliance headaches. Late or incorrect social security remittances trigger penalties and can affect employees' benefit entitlements. This is where specialist support matters whether that's a local payroll bureau or a platform with built-in compliance for German payroll.

Once payroll runs successfully, you're operationally live. But expect the first 2-3 months to involve ongoing adjustments as you fine tune processes and address issues that only emerge in practice.

👉 Tip: Using a partner with rapid onboarding processes can help accelerate hiring once your entity is operational.

CFO Due-Diligence Checklist for EOR and Entity Partners

Choosing the wrong employment partner creates the exact problems you're trying to avoid, compliance failures, operational disruption, and board-level headaches. Mid-market CFOs face particular risk because you lack the procurement teams and vendor management resources that enterprise companies deploy.

Your due diligence determines whether a partner simplifies expansion or becomes another vendor to manage.

Legal Entity Ownership Structure

Understand who legally employs your people and where liability sits. Some EOR providers use third-party entities or partner networks, creating unclear accountability when issues arise. Others own their entities in each country, giving you direct recourse.

Ask: "If there's a payroll error or compliance failure, who is legally responsible?" The answer ought to be unambiguous. Shared liability models or partner networks often mean finger-pointing when problems occur.

For entity management partners, verify they have in country legal expertise and can provide locally qualified advice. A UK law firm offering German employment contracts drafted by UK solicitors creates compliance risk.

Data Security Accreditation

Employment data includes sensitive personal information, financial details, and in some cases, security clearances. For defence and financial services companies, data security isn't optional, it's a regulatory requirement and contractual obligation.

ISO 27001 certification provides baseline assurance that your partner has implemented proper information security controls. For defence contractors, you may want additional certifications like Cyber Essentials Plus or industry specific accreditations.

Ask about data residency. Where is employee data stored, and does it remain within the jurisdiction where they work? GDPR requires that personal data of EU employees stays within the EU unless specific safeguards are in place. Partners who store all data in US-based systems create compliance exposure.

Fair and Transparent Pricing Model

Mid-market budgets can't absorb surprise fees or opaque pricing structures. You want to know exactly what you're paying per employee, per month, with no hidden charges for routine services.

Beware of pricing that seems too good to be true, it usually is. EOR services priced at £200-£250 per employee often exclude statutory benefits, payroll processing fees, or compliance support. You'll discover the real cost when invoices arrive.

Compare total cost of ownership.

For entity setup, get fixed price quotes for the full scope registration, statutory compliance, ongoing support. Hourly billing creates budget uncertainty and misaligned incentives.

Specialist Access SLAs

When payroll fails or a compliance question arises, you want answers within hours, not days. Chatbot support and ticket queues don't cut it for mid-market companies managing board expectations and regulatory deadlines.

Look for partners offering named specialists, actual people who know your business and can make decisions. 24/5 human support means someone answers the phone when your German employee calls with a payroll question at 4pm UK time (5pm in Germany).

Ask about escalation paths. If your account manager can't resolve an issue, how quickly can you reach someone who can? Enterprise vendors often have multiple escalation tiers that add days to resolution. Mid-market companies want faster paths to expertise.

How a Single Platform Simplifies Multi-Entity Reporting

Managing employment across multiple countries and multiple vendors creates reporting chaos. Your finance team spends hours reconciling invoices, chasing data, and building consolidated reports for board meetings. This is the operational tax that vendor sprawl imposes.

A unified platform eliminates this by consolidating contractors, EOR arrangements, and owned entities in one system. You get single-source reporting, consolidated invoicing, and audit-ready data without manual reconciliation.

Consolidated Invoices in GBP

Instead of managing separate invoices from contractors platforms, EOR providers, and local payroll bureaus, each in different currencies with different payment terms, you receive one invoice in GBP covering all employment costs.

This simplifies accruals, budgeting, and variance analysis. Your FP&A team can track employment costs by country, department, or cost centre without building complex allocation models across multiple vendor systems.

For board reporting, consolidated invoicing means you can present total employment costs with confidence, rather than caveating that "we're still reconciling three vendor invoices."

Audit-Ready Data Exports

Auditors want employment records, payroll journals, tax filings, and statutory compliance documentation. When information lives across multiple systems and vendors, gathering audit evidence becomes a multi-week project.

A unified platform aims to provide audit trails and standardised data exports for multiple countries, making it easier to access employment contracts, payroll registers, tax remittance confirmations, and compliance certifications with a few clicks.

This matters particularly for financial services and defence companies facing regular compliance audits. The ability to produce complete, accurate employment records on demand reduces audit costs and eliminates findings related to incomplete documentation.

Contractor to Employee Conversion Without Re-Onboarding

Many mid-market companies start with contractors, convert successful ones to EOR arrangements, and eventually bring them onto owned entities as headcount grows. Each transition typically means re-onboarding, new contracts, new systems, new payroll setup.

On a unified platform, transitions happen in the background. The employee's profile, payment details, and work history carry forward. You're changing the employment model, not the employment relationship.

This eliminates the friction that causes companies to delay transitions. We've seen companies keep contractors on contractor status longer than optimal because the re-onboarding burden feels too high. A seamless platform removes that barrier.

👉 Example: Professional services firms often convert contractors to employees once they've worked 6-12 months and proven their value. On separate platforms, this means terminating the contractor relationship, onboarding as a new employee, and losing historical data. On Teamed, it's a status change that takes minutes, not weeks.

Common Mistakes That Delay Board Approval

Even well prepared board packs can stall if they trigger concerns the CFO didn't anticipate. Here are the patterns we see repeatedly in mid-market expansion plans.

Under-Estimating Local Director Liability

Many CFOs present entity setup as a straightforward corporate structure decision without addressing director liability. Then a board member asks, "Who's personally liable if we get German payroll taxes wrong?" and the conversation derails.

In Ireland, France, Germany, and other European jurisdictions, directors may face personal liability for unpaid employment taxes under certain circumstances. This isn't theoretical, tax authorities actively pursue directors when companies fail to remit correctly.

Your board pack might want to address this upfront: who will serve as local directors, what indemnity protections are in place, and what controls ensure payroll compliance. If you're using professional director services, explain the cost and why it's worthwhile.

Ignoring Currency Conversion Risk

A German entity with costs in Euros and revenue in GBP faces currency exposure that can materially impact your P&L. A 10% EUR/GBP movement translates directly to 10% variance in your employment costs when reported in GBP.

Boards want to know you've thought about this. Natural hedging through Euro-denominated revenue is ideal but not always possible. Forward contracts, currency options, or accepting the exposure as part of doing business in Europe are all valid approaches, but you want an approach.

Presenting a financial model that assumes static exchange rates without acknowledging currency risk suggests incomplete planning. Add a sensitivity analysis showing P&L impact at different exchange rates.

Late Vendor Onboarding Paperwork

Entity setup timelines assume your vendors (banks, payroll providers, compliance advisors) respond promptly. In reality, vendor onboarding often takes longer than the legal entity registration itself.

Banks want extensive due diligence. Payroll bureaus require corporate documents, director information, and signed service agreements before they'll begin setup. Compliance advisors require detailed scope discussions and engagement letters.

Start vendor selection and onboarding before board approval if possible, or immediately after. Waiting until your entity is registered to begin vendor conversations adds 4-8 weeks to your timeline.

Your board pack might want to acknowledge vendor lead times and show you've factored them into your implementation roadmap. This demonstrates operational maturity and reduces the risk of missed hiring deadlines.

Your Next Move With 24-Hour Onboarding and 180+ Country Coverage

Entity setup decisions shape your company's operational flexibility for years. Get it right, and you've built infrastructure that scales cleanly from 10 employees to 100. Get it wrong, and you're managing compliance crises, vendor sprawl, and board questions about why international expansion is taking so long.

The CFOs who succeed treat this as a strategic platform decision, not a tactical vendor selection. They're looking for partners who eliminate the forced choice between speed and compliance, who can handle contractors today, EOR tomorrow, and owned entities next year without requiring platform migrations or operational disruption.

This is where Teamed's unified approach matters. We've built the employment platform that mid-market companies don't outgrow, handling contractors, EOR, and entity management on one system across 180+ countries. When you're ready to graduate from EOR to owned entities, your employees stay in place whilst we support your compliance efforts, guide you through contract updates, and assist with payroll changes in the background.

Our 24/5 specialists handle the complex cases, works councils, collective agreements, and regulatory edge cases that require human judgment. We've been in global employment long enough to understand the compliance pitfalls that catch mid-market companies, and we're nimble enough to adopt technology that delivers real value without the hype.

For defence, financial services, and professional services companies expanding across Europe, we solve for the toughest use cases. If we can handle German works councils, Irish director liability, and Spanish labour protections, the rest is straightforward.

Talk to our specialists about building your board pack with confidence and operational infrastructure that scales with your ambitions.

FAQs About Board Packs for Entity Set-Up

What is the ideal board pack length for entity approval?

Aim for 15 pages of core content with detailed appendices available on request. Boards want comprehensive information presented concisely executive summary on page one, key decisions and risks by page three, detailed financials and implementation plans following. Longer packs risk losing board attention; shorter packs suggest incomplete planning.

How early do board pack documents get distributed before the meeting?

Distribute board packs at least five business days before the meeting, ideally seven. This gives directors time to review properly, formulate questions, and seek clarification on complex points before the meeting. Last minute distribution often leads to deferred decisions whilst the board seeks additional information.

Can we approve multiple European entities in one board resolution?

Yes, though it's often cleaner to approve them separately if timing or circumstances differ materially. A single resolution can authorise entity setup in Germany, France, and Ireland if the strategic rationale, financial model, and risk profile are similar. However, if one market is immediate and another is contingent on client wins, separate resolutions give you flexibility to proceed independently.

Who signs the foreign bank account mandate for new entities?

The entity's appointed directors sign bank mandates, as they have legal authority over the entity's operations. If you're using professional director services, they'll sign based on your instructions. Some banks accept dual signature arrangements requiring both local directors and parent company officers, providing additional control whilst maintaining local compliance.

What data privacy clauses appear in employment contracts?

European employment contracts require GDPR compliant data processing clauses explaining what personal data you'll collect, how it will be used, where it will be stored, and employees' rights regarding their data. Contracts reference your privacy policy and specify the legal basis for processing (typically contract performance and legal obligation). For defence and financial services roles involving security clearances, additional consent clauses for background checks and ongoing monitoring are standard.