Teamed vs Boundless
Teamed vs Boundless: your own entity via GEMO, or a Europe-first EOR
These are two different products. Boundless is a Europe-first Employer of Record, plus a contractor product, and it does not build or run your own entity. Its EOR is the way to hire without one, and it is part of Payoneer's stack since January 2026. Teamed runs EOR too, and then builds and runs the entity you own through GEMO, in 100+ countries on the same system, with proactive crossover advice and no employee re-onboarding. Choose on whether you want to avoid running a company of your own, or build one and be told when the time is right.
1,000+ companies advised
- 100+
- Countries where GEMO builds and runs the entity you own. Same platform as EOR, no re-onboarding.
- 187+
- Countries Teamed reaches for EOR, through 57 owned entities plus vetted in-country partners.
- 4.8
- Teamed G2 rating. Boundless also 4.8 on G2.
Disclosure
Teamed produced this comparison and is one of the two providers in it. We score what a buyer actually weighs when the choice is between building your own entity and hiring through an EOR that keeps you off that route. We name where Boundless leads: the lower published EOR base, its Europe-first depth, and the Payoneer payments convergence. We don't claim to be the cheapest, and we don't claim to win every column.
Teamed or Boundless: build and run your own entity, or hire through a Europe-first EOR?
These are two different products. Boundless is a Europe-first Employer of Record, plus a contractor product, and it does not build or run your own entity. Its EOR is the way to hire without one, and it is part of Payoneer's stack since January 2026. Teamed runs EOR too, and then builds and runs the entity you own through GEMO, in 100+ countries on the same system, with proactive crossover advice and no employee re-onboarding. Choose on whether you want to avoid running a company of your own, or build one and be told when the time is right.
The short version
- These are two different products. Boundless is a Europe-first EOR, plus a contractor product. It does not build or run your own entity. Teamed does both.
- On the EOR base, Boundless is lower, from EUR175 per employee per month billed in euros against Teamed's $599 flat. Compare the all-in cost, not the sticker.
- Teamed GEMO builds and runs the entity you own in 100+ countries on the same system as your EOR, and models the month your own entity beats EOR per country.
- Boundless is part of Payoneer since January 2026. If you already run payments through Payoneer and want to hire in Europe without your own entity, that convergence is a real advantage.
At a glance
Teamed
Rated 4.8 on G2
Best for: companies ready to build and run their own entity, on the same system as their EOR, with proactive advice on when the crossover arrives, across 100+ countries.
Boundless
Rated 4.8 on G2
Best for: companies that want to hire in Europe through an EOR without running an entity, with a lower published base and Payoneer payments in one stack.
Shared by both: EOR employment through owned or partner entities · compliant payroll and employment contracts · real HR and legal experts with country-specific depth
| Where it matters | Who leads | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Headline EOR price | Boundless | Boundless publishes an EOR base from EUR175 per employee per month, about $199, billed in euros. Teamed is $599 flat. On the entry-product sticker, Boundless is lower, and that gap is worth weighing first. |
| Building and running your own entity | Teamed | Teamed GEMO sets up and runs the entity you own in 100+ countries, on the same system as your EOR. Boundless has no entity-setup product. Its EOR is the way to hire without running a company of your own. |
| Crossover modelling | Teamed | Teamed models the month your own entity beats EOR per country and flags it. Boundless does not publish crossover modelling, and its EOR is positioned to keep you off the entity route entirely. |
| Cost clarity | Teamed | Teamed itemises every line and absorbs FX at zero markup, with the applied rate shown against the mid-market reference. The deposit and exit terms are set out before you sign. Boundless prices in euros and does not publish its conversion terms on the website. |
| Support | Draw | Both put real people on the account, so this is close. Boundless gives a dedicated account manager, rated well on G2 for responsiveness. Teamed gives direct HR and legal experts on every plan, with Ted, its AI layer, handling the routine so you reach a person faster. |
| Compliance and in-country coverage | Teamed | Teamed publishes how it delivers compliance: its own entities in 57 countries, DLA Piper as global counsel, and the best in-country partners on top where a jurisdiction needs them. Boundless describes Europe-first coverage but does not publish the owned-versus-partner split. |
| Coverage breadth | Teamed | Teamed reaches 187+ countries for EOR. Boundless runs direct EOR in roughly 28 to 31 countries, reaching 110+ markets through partners and 160+ for contractors. For a footprint beyond Europe, Teamed's owned-entity spread is wider. |
| European EOR depth | Draw | Boundless is Europe-first, serving 21 European countries directly with strong local jurisdiction knowledge per G2 reviewers. Teamed owns entities across key European markets too. In Europe, the two are close. |
| Payments integration | Boundless | Boundless is part of Payoneer's financial stack since January 2026, so EOR and payments converge for Payoneer users. Teamed is independent and connects to the payments and payroll tools you already run. |
Teamed on G2
Who Teamed is for
Teamed is for companies at or approaching the point where their own entity beats EOR, that want the same team to build and run it, and to be told when the crossover arrives. If you are hiring across several countries and want the whole path, contractor to EOR to your own entity, on one system, this is the fit.
Not the right fit if
- Companies that want to hire in Europe without running a company of their own. That is what an EOR is for, and Boundless is a credible Europe-first one with a lower published base. Get the conversion, deposit and exit terms in writing, then compare the all-in cost.
- Companies below the crossover point in every country. EOR is almost certainly the right model. Consider Teamed EOR at $599 flat with FX at zero markup, and revisit your own entity when a country passes roughly 10 to 15 employees.
- Teams that already run payments through Payoneer and want everything on one provider. Boundless inside the Payoneer stack converges EOR and payments. If that convergence is the priority, it fits better.
Find your pick in 20 seconds
| If you are… | Start with | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Ready to build and run your own entity, in Europe or beyond | Teamed GEMO | Builds and runs your entity in 100+ countries on the same system as your EOR, with no re-onboarding. |
| Want to hire in Europe through an EOR, no entity of your own | Boundless | A Europe-first EOR with a lower published base, now inside the Payoneer payments stack. |
| Not sure yet whether you need your own entity | Teamed | Start on EOR. Teamed models the crossover per country and tells you when the maths flip. |
| Already run international payments through Payoneer | Boundless | EOR and payments converge on one provider for Payoneer users. |
What is the Teamed vs Boundless comparison?
Entity management and EOR are two different products, and this comparison spans both. An Employer of Record (EOR) legally employs your people through its own entity or a vetted local partner, so you can hire in a country before you have a company there. Setting up and running your own entity is the opposite move: you become the direct employer, which tends to win on cost once your headcount in a country passes the crossover point, roughly 10 to 15 full-time employees in most European markets.
Boundless sells an EOR and a contractor product. It does not build or run your own entity. Its own site frames the EOR as the way to hire without setting up a company, and since January 2026 it has been part of Payoneer's financial stack. Teamed sells both sides. Its EOR reaches 187+ countries through 57 owned entities plus vetted in-country partners, and its Global Entity and Employment Operations (GEMO) then builds and runs the entity you own in 100+ countries, on the same platform, with no employee re-onboarding.
Every EOR delivers through a mix of owned entities and vetted partners, Teamed and Boundless both. What differs is whether you can see the structure. Teamed publishes three layers: its own legal entities in 57 countries, DLA Piper as global counsel for a consistent standard across borders, and the best in-country partners on top where a jurisdiction needs them. Boundless describes Europe-first coverage, but does not publish a clean owned-versus-partner split.
So the honest read is that these are two answers to different questions. If you want to hire in Europe without running a company of your own, Boundless is a credible EOR with a lower published base and Payoneer payments in one stack. If you want to build and run your own entity, or to be told when EOR stops being the right model and then make the move on the same system, that is what Teamed is for.
Two different products
These aren't the same product scored side by side. Boundless is a Europe-first EOR, plus a contractor product. It doesn't set up or run your own entity, and its own site frames the EOR as the way to hire without one. Teamed runs EOR too, and then builds and runs the entity you own through GEMO on the same system. So the real question isn't which is better in the abstract. It's whether you want to avoid running a company of your own, or build one and be told when the time is right.
| Detail | Teamed | Boundless |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | EOR across 187+ countries, plus GEMO, which builds and runs the entity you own in 100+ countries on the same system. | A Europe-first EOR and a contractor product. No product that sets up or runs your own entity. |
| The move it is built for | Hire on EOR now, then graduate to your own entity when the crossover arrives, with no employee re-onboarding. | Hire without setting up a company of your own. Boundless positions its EOR as the alternative to running an entity. |
Name the outcome you want
If the goal is to avoid running a company of your own, an EOR is the answer, and Boundless is a credible one in Europe. If the goal is to build and run your own entity, ask which provider actually does that. Only one in this comparison does.
Pricing and cost clarity
On the EOR base, Boundless is lower. It publishes from EUR175 per employee per month, about $199 or GBP149, billed in euros. Teamed is $599 flat. If the sticker on the entry product decides it, that decision is made. But the base is only part of the bill. Boundless prices in euros and doesn't publish its conversion terms, and entity setup isn't one of its products to price at all. Teamed itemises every line, absorbs FX at zero markup with the applied rate shown against the mid-market reference, and sets the deposit and exit terms out before you sign.
| Detail | Teamed | Boundless |
|---|---|---|
| EOR base | $599 USD / £479 GBP per employee per month, flat. No annual commitment required. | From EUR175 per employee per month, about $199 or GBP149, billed in euros. Employer taxes and mandatory benefits are billed on top. |
| What sits around the fee | Every line itemised. FX absorbed at zero markup, shown against the mid-market reference. The deposit is one month of salary, refundable. No onboarding or offboarding fees, though leaving within the first three months may incur a fee. | Priced in euros. The conversion terms are not published on the website. Ask for them in writing before you sign. |
See the all-in number
A lower base billed in another currency can land higher once conversion, deposit and exit terms are counted. Ask both for the full contract, not the pricing page, and model them on the same basis.
Your own entity and the crossover
This is where the two diverge most. Teamed models the month your own entity beats EOR per country and flags it, then builds and runs the entity in 100+ countries on the same system, with no re-onboarding. Boundless doesn't build your entity at all. Its EOR keeps you off the entity route, which is a legitimate choice, but it means the crossover decision and the entity build are yours to arrange elsewhere.
| Detail | Teamed | Boundless |
|---|---|---|
| When to move | Models the crossover month per country and tells you when your own entity beats EOR. | No crossover modelling published. The EOR is positioned to keep you off the entity route. |
| Making the move | Builds and runs your entity in 100+ countries on the same system, with no re-onboarding of existing employees. | No entity-setup product. Moving to your own entity means arranging it with another provider. |
Ask before you sign
Ask whether your provider will tell you when your own entity beats EOR, and whether it can build and run that entity on the same system. Advice you get before you need it beats working it out afterward.
Coverage and European depth
Two different shapes. Boundless is Europe-first: it runs direct EOR in roughly 28 to 31 countries, 21 of them in Europe, reaches 110+ markets through partners, and its contractor product reaches 160+. In its core European markets, that depth is real. Teamed reaches 187+ countries for EOR through 57 owned entities plus vetted in-country partners, and publishes which of your countries fall on each side. For a European-only footprint, the two are close. For a footprint that runs beyond Europe, Teamed's owned-entity spread is wider.
| Detail | Teamed | Boundless |
|---|---|---|
| Global reach | EOR across 187+ countries through 57 owned entities plus vetted in-country partners. GEMO builds your own entity in 100+. | Direct EOR in roughly 28 to 31 countries, 110+ markets through partners, contractor product in 160+. |
| European depth | Owned entities across key European markets, with DLA Piper as global counsel and the best in-country partners on top. | Europe-first by design, with 21 European countries served directly and strong local jurisdiction knowledge per G2 reviewers. |
Ask what's behind the flag
For each country you hire in, ask whether the employer is an entity the provider owns or an in-country partner, and who handles a contested case. A coverage number is just a list of countries.
Payments, independence and support
Boundless is part of Payoneer's financial stack, so if you already move money through Payoneer, EOR and payments converge on one provider. That's a genuine advantage for a Payoneer shop. Teamed is independent and connects to the payroll and HR tools you already run rather than replacing them. On support, both put real people on the account: Boundless a dedicated account manager rated well on G2, Teamed direct access to HR and legal experts on every plan, with Ted, its AI layer, handling the routine so you reach a person faster.
| Detail | Teamed | Boundless |
|---|---|---|
| Payments | Independent. Connects to the payments and payroll tools you already run. | Part of Payoneer's stack since January 2026. EOR and payments converge for Payoneer users. |
| Support | HR and legal experts on all plans, no tier to unlock, with Ted handling the routine. People approve every outcome. | Dedicated account manager per engagement, rated well on G2 for responsiveness. |
Weigh your payments stack
If your payments already run through Payoneer, the converged workflow is a real saving. If not, independence and clean connectors to the tools you run may matter more. Name your stack and ask what connects today.
Why the comparison matters
Behind every line item is a real person, in a real place.
The fee, the FX and the support model are not abstractions. They decide whether the person you hired in Barcelona or Rome is paid right, on time, by someone who knows their employment law. That is the comparison worth running.
What each stakeholder evaluates
| Criterion | Legal | Finance | People Ops | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EOR now, or your own entity | Ask the provider to model the crossover month in every country where you hire or plan to. Teamed does this as standard and flags the point when your own entity beats EOR on cost. Boundless does not build your entity, so past the crossover you would arrange the setup with another provider and run two relationships. The crossover varies by salary mix and country, typically 10 to 15 employees in most European markets. | At $599 per employee per month, twelve EOR employees cost about $86,000 a year in platform fees alone. Once a country passes the crossover point, a registered local entity plus bookkeeping, accounting and annual filings can undercut that. Teamed models the exact figure for your salary mix and market. Boundless does not build the entity, so that comparison is yours to run. | The transition from EOR to your own entity is the moment employees move from their employer of record to your company. GEMO handles the migration on the same platform, so employees keep their existing payroll history and continuity. Because Boundless has no entity product, that move would happen with a different provider, which creates a fresh employment setup and a gap in institutional records. | Your own entity gives you full control over data residency and employment contracts in that country. Ask both providers where employee data is stored during any transition, who holds the employer-of-record status between EOR exit and entity activation, and whether your audit trail stays continuous. |
| One path, or two providers | GEMO is designed to remove the legal handover risk: contracts, obligations and data move within a single system. Building your entity with a separate provider means terminating the EOR relationship, issuing new employment contracts under the new entity, and onboarding employees on a new system. That creates two legal events in the same payroll cycle. Ask your legal team how they want to handle the gap. | Running EOR with one provider and entity setup with another creates reconciliation overhead across two invoice cycles, two contract relationships, and two support queues. GEMO puts this on one platform and one invoice. That is not a trivial operational saving if you are managing entities across three or more countries at once. | For your employees, a visible change of employer is disruptive even if the practical difference is small. GEMO keeps the administrative record intact, which matters most for long-tenure employees or those approaching a statutory benefit threshold such as enhanced redundancy or long-service leave. | Two vendor relationships mean two sets of data-processing agreements, two postures to audit, and two sets of credentials for HR admins to manage. Combining EOR and the entity build on one platform narrows the surface and simplifies your data-governance audit trail. |
| Where you actually hire | If your hiring roadmap runs beyond Europe, confirm your EOR provider covers those countries directly. Teamed reaches 187+ countries and builds your own entity in 100+. Boundless runs direct EOR in roughly 28 to 31 countries and is Europe-first. A mismatch between your provider and your actual geography creates a second-vendor risk at scale. | Locking in a Europe-first EOR creates a re-procurement risk when your hiring plan extends to Latin America, Southeast Asia or Africa. Teamed's wider footprint means you are less likely to outgrow the coverage. Model your three-year hiring plan before you commit. | A single provider covering your full footprint is operationally simpler than running country-specific vendors. Know your roadmap. If you expect entities in several regions within 24 months, a Europe-first provider adds complexity at the point you least want it. | Data-residency requirements vary between Europe, the US, Singapore and Latin America. Confirm per country how each provider handles employee-data storage, legal basis, and sub-processor relationships for markets outside its core footprint. |
How Teamed takes you from EOR to your own entity
Most transitions take eight to twelve weeks. The incorporation paperwork is the fast part. The operational plan, employee communications, and payroll-calendar alignment take longer. GEMO handles all of it on the same system as your EOR.
Step 1
Model the crossover
Teamed models the month your own entity beats EOR in the target country. You see the exact headcount, salary mix and cost comparison before you commit to setup.
Step 2
Incorporate the entity
GEMO registers the entity, appoints directors, opens a local bank account, and files the initial compliance requirements. Teamed handles the in-market filings.
Step 3
Migrate employees from EOR
Your employees move from the Teamed EOR employer to your new entity on the same platform. No new onboarding flow, no gap in payroll records, no re-signed contracts unless local law requires them.
Step 4
Run ongoing employment operations
GEMO manages payroll, benefits, employment-law advisory and compliance on the same system going forward. One platform, one support team, one invoice.
Dyke Yaxley · UK chartered accountancy
100% audit capacity added. Zero entity setup.
- Audit capacity in 2024
- +100%
- Compliance issues across the engagement
- 0
- South Africa hires, both retained
- 2
- Entity setup required at this stage
- None
Challenge
Dyke Yaxley, a UK chartered accountancy with over a century of history, was turning down audit work in 2024. Local UK talent supply for qualified auditors had not kept pace with client demand. Cross-border hiring felt legally involved for a firm whose brand sits on compliance discipline.
Approach
Dyke Yaxley partnered with Teamed to hire two qualified audit professionals in South Africa via EOR. Teamed handled the South African employment-law side end-to-end: compliant contract, local payroll, statutory tax obligations, and onboarding logistics. No entity setup, no South African legal counsel on retainer, no permanent-establishment exposure.
Result
Both hires exceeded expectations on technical work, client satisfaction and cultural fit. Audit capacity doubled in 2024. Zero compliance issues across the engagement. The firm went from declining new audit work to confidently taking on additional clients. Building their own entity via GEMO is the next step on the same platform when the maths flip.
Interactive tool
Model the entity crossover in your target country
Enter your headcount and salary mix. The crossover calculator shows the month your own entity beats EOR on cost, per country. Weighing an EOR base like Boundless against building your own entity? Model the all-in cost at your real headcount, not the headline.
Decision checklist
- Choose Teamed to build and run your own entity. GEMO sets it up and operates it in 100+ countries on the same system as your EOR, with no employee re-onboarding.
- Choose Teamed for proactive crossover advice. Teamed models the month your own entity beats EOR per country and tells you when to move.
- Choose Teamed for cost clarity. Every line itemised, FX absorbed at zero markup and shown against the mid-market reference, deposit and exit terms set out before you sign.
- Choose Boundless if you want a Europe-first EOR with a lower published base, and you would rather hire without running a company of your own.
- Choose Boundless if you already run payments through Payoneer and want EOR and payments converging on one provider.
Honest take
When Boundless is the better choice
- Choose Boundless if you want to hire in Europe through an EOR and would rather not run a company of your own. Its published base is lower than Teamed's, and its Europe-first depth is real. Model both all-in first.
- Choose Boundless if you already run international payments through Payoneer. The combined workflow of EOR and payments on one provider is a genuine operational simplification, and that is not a theoretical benefit for a company whose payments sit in Europe.
- Choose Boundless if your entire footprint will stay in its core European markets and a dedicated account manager is the support model you want. If the market is European and you are not building your own entity, it is a credible choice.
Teamed leads on building and running your own entity, cost clarity, global coverage and the proactive crossover advisory that tells you when to move. It doesn't lead on the published EOR base or Payoneer payments convergence, and this page says so. If Boundless's all-in cost works for you and a Europe-first EOR is what you need, it may be the right call. We'd rather say that than win a deal that's wrong for both sides.
Questions to ask any EOR before you sign
- 1Do you set up and run my own entity, or only employ my people through your EOR? If only EOR, who builds the entity when I outgrow it?
- 2Will you model the month my own entity beats EOR per country, and tell me proactively, or do I work it out myself?
- 3When my employees move from EOR to my own entity, do they keep their contract and payroll history, or do they re-onboard?
- 4What currency will I be billed in, and will you show the applied conversion rate against a public reference on every invoice?
- 5In each country I hire in, is the employer an entity you own or an in-country partner, and who handles a contested case?
Frequently asked questions
Does Boundless set up your own entity?
No. Boundless sells an Employer of Record product and a contractor product. It does not build or run your own legal entity, and its own site positions the EOR as the way to hire in a country without setting up a company of your own. If you want to establish and run your own entity, that is a different product. In this comparison, Teamed GEMO is the one that does it, building and running the entity you own in 100+ countries on the same system as your EOR.What is Teamed GEMO?
GEMO stands for Global Entity and Employment Operations. It is Teamed's service for setting up your own legal entity in a target country and then running the ongoing employment operations on the same platform as your EOR. The scope covers building and running your own entity in 100+ countries. When your employees move from EOR to your new entity, they don't re-onboard: their payroll history, contract records and benefits continuity carry across within the same system.When should I move from EOR to my own entity?
The crossover point depends on your headcount and salary mix per country. As a rough guide, EOR stays cheaper than your own entity below roughly 10 to 15 full-time employees in most European markets. Above that, the cumulative per-seat EOR fee approaches the fixed cost of entity registration, a local director where required, bookkeeping, and annual compliance filings. Teamed models this crossover per country as a standard part of the advisory relationship, and then builds the entity on the same system. Boundless does not build the entity, so past the crossover you would arrange it elsewhere.Is Teamed cheaper than Boundless?
Not on the published EOR base. Boundless starts from EUR175 per employee per month, about $199, billed in euros, and Teamed is $599 flat, so on the headline Boundless is lower. We say so. What the headline doesn't cover is the conversion cost, the deposit and exit terms, and the fact that Boundless prices in euros without publishing its conversion methodology. Teamed absorbs conversion at zero markup on the fee, shows the applied rate against the mid-market reference, and itemises every line. Get both sets of terms in writing, model them on the same basis, then decide. The point isn't that Teamed is lower. It's that you see the whole number.Can Boundless take me from EOR to my own entity?
Not on its own. Boundless employs your workers as the employer of record, handling contracts, payroll and compliance under its own entity, and its contractor product covers freelancers. There is no Boundless product that sets up and runs your own company, so moving to your own entity means arranging that with a separate provider and running a cutover between two relationships. Teamed avoids that friction: GEMO runs the entity build on the same platform as the EOR, so the move is an in-platform transition rather than two vendor engagements.Is Boundless still independent after the Payoneer acquisition?
Boundless is no longer independent. It became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Payoneer (NASDAQ: PAYO) when the acquisition closed on January 20, 2026. Boundless continues to operate under its own brand and leadership team. For some buyers the Payoneer connection is a benefit: if you already run international payments through Payoneer, the convergence of EOR and payments on one financial provider is a genuine operational simplification. For others, particularly those with procurement policies that require vendor independence, the Payoneer ownership is worth raising with your legal or compliance team.How long does it take Teamed to set up my entity?
Entity setup timelines vary by country and entity type. A UK limited company typically completes in two to four weeks. A Singapore private limited company typically takes two to three weeks. Some European markets can take six to ten weeks where notarisation and commercial-register steps are involved. The full operational setup, payroll, benefits and employment contracts under the new entity, adds time on top of the legal registration. For most markets, the total GEMO transition from EOR to a fully operational entity takes eight to twelve weeks. Teamed maps the timeline per country at the start of the engagement.
Common questions
Teamed vs Boundless, which builds and runs my own entity?
Teamed. Boundless is a Europe-first Employer of Record, plus a contractor product, and it does not set up or run your own entity. Its own site positions the EOR as the way to hire in a country without establishing a company of your own. Teamed runs EOR too, across 187+ countries through 57 owned entities plus vetted in-country partners, and then GEMO builds and runs the entity you own in 100+ countries on the same platform, with no employee re-onboarding. Teamed also models the month your own entity beats EOR per country and flags it. So if the outcome you want is your own entity, or advice on when to move to one, Teamed is the provider in this comparison built to do it. If the outcome you want is to hire in Europe through an EOR without running an entity, Boundless is a credible answer, and if you already use Payoneer, its payments convergence is a real benefit.Is Boundless cheaper than Teamed for EOR in Europe?
On the published base, yes. Boundless starts from EUR175 per employee per month, about $199, billed in euros, against Teamed's $599 flat, so for straightforward European EOR the Boundless sticker is lower. What the sticker leaves out is the conversion cost, the deposit and exit terms, and, because Boundless prices in euros, the conversion methodology, which it does not publish. Teamed itemises every line, absorbs FX at zero markup, and shows the applied rate against the mid-market reference. Boundless also does not build your own entity, so if your headcount in a country is heading past the crossover point, the cheaper base is only cheaper until you outgrow EOR. Model both all-in, and factor in where you are going, not just where you are today.
For the buying committee
Share with your team
Send this page to legal, finance, or HR for review. They will see the same statutory data and source citations you did.
Before you decide, model the crossover.
Share your headcount and target countries. A real HR or legal expert sends back the month your own entity becomes cheaper than EOR, with GEMO quoted alongside. No demo, no commitment.
The honest path
Want the Boundless comparison run on your numbers?
Tell us your headcount and where you're hiring. A real HR or legal expert sends back a like-for-like breakdown with the FX shown against mid-market. No demo, no deck.
