Teamed vs Native Teams
Teamed vs Native Teams, scored on nine dimensions
Teamed is a focused global employment system. Contractor, EOR, your own entity, all on one stack. It leads on cost clarity, support and in-country compliance, and it advises you on the right model wherever you start. Native Teams publishes a lower base, from $99, and runs a broad mobile-first payments platform with multi-tier contractor payments. Choose on whether the sticker and the payments breadth beat clarity and depth.
1,000+ companies advised
- $599
- Teamed flat fee per employee per month. Every line on the invoice is itemised.
- 24-48h
- Teamed time to first payroll in straightforward markets.
- 4.8
- Teamed G2 rating for service.
Disclosure
Teamed produced this comparison and is one of the two providers in it. We score what a buyer actually weighs. We name where Native Teams leads: the lower published base, from $99, and its multi-tier contractor payments on a mobile-first platform. We don't claim to be the cheapest, and we don't claim to win every column.
Teamed vs Native Teams: which one should you choose in 2026?
Teamed is a focused global employment system. Contractor, EOR, your own entity, all on one stack. It leads on cost clarity, support and in-country compliance, and it advises you on the right model wherever you start. Native Teams publishes a lower base, from $99, and runs a broad mobile-first payments platform with multi-tier contractor payments. Choose on whether the sticker and the payments breadth beat clarity and depth.
The short version
- Compare the all-in cost, not the sticker. Native Teams' base is lower, from $99. But it doesn't set out onboarding, minimum term, offboarding or termination. Teamed itemises every line.
- Teamed is a focused global employment platform, contractor to EOR to your own entity on one system. It doesn't replace your HRIS. It connects to the systems you already run. Native Teams runs a broad mobile-first payments platform.
- You reach a real HR or legal expert when it matters. Not a chatbot, not a ticket queue.
- Whatever you start with, contractor, EOR or an entity, Teamed advises you on the model that fits, and tells you when to change.
At a glance
Teamed
Rated 4.8 on G2 for service
Best for: fast-growing companies with an international footprint that want global employment run properly, real HR and legal experts they can reach, and advice on the right model wherever they start.
Native Teams
Rated 4.9 on G2
Best for: teams that want the lowest published base, from $99, or the broadest multi-tier contractor payments on a mobile-first payments platform.
Shared by both: contractor and EOR on one platform · broad global coverage · entity setup offered as a product · human support included on every plan
| Where it matters | Who leads | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Headline price | Native Teams | Native Teams publishes an EOR base from $99 per employee per month. Teamed is $599 flat. On the sticker, Native Teams is lower, and that gap is real. Only one tier is shown, and higher configurations go to a custom quote, so confirm the $99 applies to your salary band before you weigh it. |
| Cost clarity | Teamed | The base is only part of the bill. Native Teams doesn't set out onboarding, minimum term, offboarding or termination on its pricing page. Teamed itemises every line. FX is absorbed at zero markup, with the applied rate shown against the mid-market reference. The exit terms are set out before you sign. The point isn't a lower price. It's that you see the whole number. |
| Support | Teamed | Native Teams is well rated on G2, at 4.9, and provides human support via live chat, email and an account manager. Teamed leads on the hard cases. You reach an HR or legal expert directly on every plan, with no support tier to unlock, where Native Teams publishes no support-tier structure. On a contested exit or an audit, that access is what counts. |
| Platform | Teamed | Two products, two buyers, and this one goes to Teamed on fit. Native Teams runs a broad, mobile-first payments platform, with a multi-currency wallet, expense cards and real-time tracking. Teamed is a focused global employment platform, contractor to EOR to your own entity on one system, and it connects to the HRIS and payroll you already run. Native Teams publishes no live integrations directory, nativeteams.com/integrations returns a 404, and HRIS connectors are roadmap-only. |
| Employment intelligence | Teamed | Teamed runs Ted, an AI layer inside the platform. It handles the routine, so you're seen fast. It learns from patterns across customers, so a problem solved once is solved for everyone. It flags law changes and the crossover point before they reach you. Real people approve every outcome. Native Teams doesn't frame this as a capability. |
| Compliance and in-country coverage | Teamed | Teamed delivers compliance in layers, and publishes how. Its own entities in 57 countries. DLA Piper as global counsel for cross-border consistency. Specialist in-country partners on top where a jurisdiction needs them. The best answer isn't always an owned entity. Sometimes it's the right in-country partner, and Teamed shows you which stands behind each country. Native Teams describes broad coverage, but doesn't publish how it's delivered. |
| Coverage breadth | Draw | Teamed publishes 187+ countries. Native Teams markets broad global coverage without a published country count. Both mix owned entities and partners. The totals shouldn't decide it. What matters is the model behind the countries you actually hire in. |
| Onboarding speed | Teamed | Teamed publishes 24 to 48 hours to first payroll in straightforward markets. Native Teams doesn't publish a time to first payroll. Ask both for theirs in your countries. It varies by jurisdiction more than by vendor. |
| Path to your own entity | Draw | Both offer entity setup as a product. Teamed does it via GEMO in 100+ countries on the same system, with proactive per-country crossover modelling and no re-onboarding. Native Teams offers Entity Management from $149 per month, with expert-led setup and a published EOR-to-entity crossover path. If you want the advice built in and the entity run on the same system, Teamed. If a lower-cost entity-setup product is enough, Native Teams. |
Teamed on G2
Who Teamed is for
Teamed is built for the forgotten middle. Fast-growing companies with an international footprint that want their global employment run properly, an HR or legal expert they can reach, and advice on the right model wherever they start. If you're hiring at senior salary bands across several countries and want to know what you're signing, this is your fit.
Not the right fit if
- Teams where the lowest published base is the deciding factor. Look at Native Teams itself, from $99, and confirm the rate applies at your salary band. Get the pre-funding and exit terms in writing, then compare the real all-in cost.
- Teams that want multi-tier contractor payments on a mobile-first platform. Native Teams runs three contractor plans from $19, with a multi-currency wallet, expense cards and real-time tracking. If contractor payments breadth is the priority, it fits better.
- Teams in a single-market, low-headcount test. Hiring one or two people in one country, with no entities on the horizon? The most self-serve tool will be fastest. Teamed earns its keep once the complexity is real.
Find your pick in 20 seconds
| If you are… | Start with | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest published base is the only criterion | Native Teams | From $99 per employee per month, the lowest published EOR base in the category. Confirm it applies at your salary band, and read the full contract first. |
| Multi-tier contractor payments on a mobile-first platform | Native Teams | Three contractor plans from $19, with a multi-currency wallet, expense cards and real-time tracking. A genuine product strength. |
| Contractor, EOR and your own entity unified on one system, run properly | Teamed | One system across the whole lifecycle, with real HR and legal experts and advice on the right model wherever you start. |
| A 1,000-plus seat enterprise wanting the widest owned-entity governance | G-P or Papaya Global | Built for enterprise scale and owned-entity breadth. |
What is the Teamed vs Native Teams comparison?
An Employer of Record (EOR) legally employs your people in a country through its own entity or a vetted local partner. It issues the contract, runs payroll, remits income tax and statutory contributions, and carries the employer obligations while you direct the work. You can hire compliantly in a market before you have a legal entity there.
Native Teams publishes an EOR base from $99 per employee per month, the lowest published base in the category, though only one tier is shown and higher configurations go to a custom quote. It runs a broad, mobile-first payments platform, with a multi-currency wallet, expense cards and multi-tier contractor payments. Teamed is flat at $599. It is a focused global employment system, not a payments platform: contractor to EOR to your own entity on one stack, connecting to the tools you already run rather than replacing them.
Every EOR delivers through a mix of owned entities and vetted in-country partners, Teamed and Native Teams both. What differs is whether you can see the structure. Teamed publishes three layers: its own legal entities in 57 countries, DLA Piper as global counsel for a consistent standard across borders, and specialist in-country partners on top where a jurisdiction needs them. The best answer isn't always an owned entity. Sometimes the right in-country partner gives you better local depth, and Teamed shows you which stands behind each country. Native Teams describes broad coverage, but doesn't publish how it's delivered.
The two are built for different buyers. If the published base or the breadth of the payments platform decides it, Native Teams is the stronger answer. If you want global employment run properly by people you can reach, with advice on the right model wherever you start, that is what Teamed is for.
Pricing
Native Teams' base is lower, from $99 against Teamed's $599. If the sticker decides it, that decision is made. But the number that lands on your account is the all-in one, and that's where Native Teams goes quiet. Onboarding, a minimum term, offboarding, termination: none of it is set out on the pricing page, and only one EOR tier is shown. Teamed itemises every line. It absorbs FX at zero markup, with the applied rate shown against the mid-market reference. The exit terms are set out before you sign. The point isn't that Teamed is lower. It's that you can see the whole cost.
| Detail | Teamed | Native Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Published base | $599 USD / £479 GBP per employee per month, flat. No annual commitment required. | From $99 per employee per month. Only one tier is shown; higher configurations go to a custom quote. Confirm it applies at your salary band. |
| What sits around the fee | Every line itemised. FX absorbed at zero markup, shown against the mid-market reference. The deposit is one month, refundable, and the exit terms are in the contract. No setup fees. | Onboarding, minimum term, offboarding and termination costs aren't set out on the pricing page. The conversion methodology isn't published. |
See the all-in number
Model both on the same basis before you decide. A lower base with unclear onboarding, notice and exit terms can land above a higher base that itemises everything. Ask both for the full contract, not the pricing page.
Support
Access to a person is close, and we say so. Native Teams is rated 4.9 on G2 and provides human support via live chat, email and an account manager. Teamed gives direct access to HR and legal experts on all plans, with no support tier to unlock, and is rated 4.8 for service. The gap shows on the hard cases, and on smaller accounts, where a general queue can leave you waiting. Native Teams publishes no support-tier structure. Behind Teamed's people sits Ted, its AI layer. It handles the routine so you're seen fast, and flags issues before they land. A real person approves every outcome.
| Detail | Teamed | Native Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Reaching a person | HR and legal experts on all plans. No support tier to unlock. No queue as the default first response. | Human support via live chat, email and an account manager. No published support-tier structure. |
| What the system does for you | Ted handles the routine, learns from patterns across customers, and flags law changes and the crossover point early. People approve every outcome. | Responsive and well rated, but reactive by design. |
| Service rating | Rated 4.8 on G2 for service. | Rated 4.9 on G2 across roughly 210 reviews. |
On a hard case
The test isn't the average ticket. It's the contested exit or the audit. Ask both whether that goes to a real HR or legal expert who knows your account, or into a queue.
Platform
This one goes to Teamed on fit, and we say where Native Teams is strong. Native Teams runs a broad, mobile-first payments platform, with a multi-currency wallet, expense cards and real-time tracking. That breadth is real. Teamed is a focused global employment platform. It does contractor, EOR and your own entity on one system, and it connects to the tools you already run rather than asking you to move into a new one. On live HRIS fit, Teamed leads: Native Teams publishes no live integrations directory, nativeteams.com/integrations returns a 404, and HRIS connectors are roadmap-only. Focused is the design, not a gap.
| Detail | Teamed | Native Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Shape | Focused global employment platform. Contractor to EOR to your own entity on one system. Connects to the HRIS and payroll you already run. | Broad, mobile-first payments platform with a multi-currency wallet, expense cards and real-time tracking. |
| Integrations | Integrates with the major HRIS and payroll platforms you already run. No rip-and-replace. | No live integrations directory. nativeteams.com/integrations returns a 404. HRIS connectors are roadmap-only. |
Name the systems you run
Teamed integrates with the tools you already use rather than replacing them. Tell both your stack, and ask what connects today, not what is on a roadmap.
Compliance
Every EOR runs on a mix of owned entities and in-country partners. What differs is whether you can see the structure. Teamed publishes it. Its own entities in 57 countries. DLA Piper as global counsel, holding a consistent standard across borders. Specialist in-country partners on top where a jurisdiction needs them. The best answer isn't always an owned entity. Sometimes the right in-country partner gives you better local depth, and Teamed shows you which stands behind each country. Native Teams describes broad coverage, but doesn't publish how it's delivered.
| Detail | Teamed | Native Teams |
|---|---|---|
| How compliance is delivered | Own entities in 57 countries, DLA Piper as global counsel, best in-country partners on top. The structure is published. | Broad coverage described, but the owned-versus-partner structure isn't published. |
| Depth on the hard cases | Real HR and legal experts with local employment-law experience handle contested terminations, consultations and audits directly. | Human support overall. Ask whether a given country is an owned entity or a partner, and who stands behind a contested case. |
A real example, India, April 2026
When India's new Labour Codes redefined what counts as wages, Teamed reviewed the impact across its client base, identified the affected employees, quantified each one's take-home impact, and briefed every affected client with the options before the first affected payroll ran. That is the proactive compliance Teamed is built for.
Read the full India case fileYour own entity
EOR is a stage, not the destination. Teamed advises you on the right model from your first hire onward, contractor, EOR or your own entity. It models the crossover per country and tells you when to move. Then it builds the entity and runs it on the same system, with no re-onboarding. Native Teams offers Entity Management from $149 per month, with expert-led setup and a published EOR-to-entity crossover path. It's a real product, which is why this is close. The difference is proactive modelling and a managed entity on the same system.
| Detail | Teamed | Native Teams |
|---|---|---|
| When to move | Models the crossover month per country and tells you when your own entity beats EOR. | Publishes an EOR-to-entity crossover path, expert-led, without proactive per-country modelling. |
| Making the move | Builds and runs your entity in 100+ countries on the same system, with no re-onboarding of existing employees. | Entity Management from $149 per month with expert-led setup. |
Ask before you sign
Ask your provider whether they'll tell you when to move to your own entity, and whether they can build it on the same system. Advice you get before you need it beats a guide you find afterward.
Why the comparison matters
Behind every line item is a real person, in a real place.
The fee, the FX and the support model are not abstractions. They decide whether the person you hired in Barcelona or Rome is paid right, on time, by someone who knows their employment law. That is the comparison worth running.
What each stakeholder evaluates
| Criterion | Legal | Finance | People Ops | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What you actually pay | Ask both for the currency-conversion policy, the pre-funding requirement and the exit terms in writing before signing. Native Teams publishes a base, but not a conversion methodology. Teamed absorbs conversion at zero markup on the fee, and sets the terms out before you sign. | A lower published base is a real saving. What a low base doesn't tell you is the conversion cost, the pre-funding, or the onboarding and exit terms. A mid-rate basis with an undisclosed spread can quietly add somewhere in the region of 1.5 to 3% on every salary conversion, so model it. The published base is a starting point, not a total. | Either way, your payroll team reconciles salary conversions every month. Ask what rate they will see on the invoice, and whether they can check it against a public reference. | A timestamped applied rate shown against a public mid-market reference is an auditable record. An undisclosed conversion methodology is not. |
| Support when it matters | A contested termination, a consultation or a tax-authority question needs a real employment-law expert. Ask whether one is available on your plan, or whether the support model defaults to a general queue. | Native Teams is rated 4.9 on G2, Teamed 4.8, so the headline is close. The difference is the hard case. Teamed gives direct expert access on all plans. Native Teams leads on self-serve payments breadth. | A real person when it matters, not a ticket queue. Ted sits behind the humans, handling the routine and flagging law changes and the crossover point early, with people approving every outcome. | A direct line to a real escalation contact beats an automated flow for incident handling. Know before you sign who you reach when something goes wrong at speed. |
| The path to your own entity | EOR is a transitional model. Ask whether the provider tells you when the crossover point arrives, and whether it can set up the entity on the same system without re-onboarding your employees. | Teamed models the crossover month when your own entity beats EOR, and flags it. Native Teams offers Entity Management from $149 per month, without proactive modelling. Ask whether your provider will tell you, or stay quiet. | A managed transition on the same system means your employees keep their contracts and their history. No re-onboarding, no gap in coverage. | Your own entity gives you full control over data residency and employment contracts in that country. Teamed sets it up in 100+ countries on the same system you already use. |
How switching from Native Teams to Teamed works
Most switches take four to six weeks. The operational plan is what takes time, not the paperwork. Teamed runs phased cutovers, so overlap is contained and employees never notice a gap.
Step 1
Bring your Native Teams invoice
Share your current Native Teams invoice. Teamed unbundles it line by line: gross salary, statutory at cost, platform fee, conversion residual. You see exactly where the two all-in numbers land.
Step 2
Map the operational plan
Teamed builds the cutover plan per country or per employee cohort: notice-period alignment, payroll-calendar sync, benefits continuity, employee communications. Nothing moves until the plan is agreed.
Step 3
Issue new contracts
New compliant employment contracts issue under Teamed. Employees receive their new payslip structure, with FX shown against mid-market, before the first pay cycle. No re-onboarding overhead.
Step 4
Close the Native Teams relationship
Teamed manages the Native Teams termination timeline and keeps you out of a double-billing period. Most EOR contracts are month-to-month or carry a notice period. Teamed maps the calendar.
Dyke Yaxley · UK chartered accountancy
100% audit capacity added. Zero entity setup.
- Audit capacity in 2024
- +100%
- Compliance issues across the engagement
- 0
- South Africa hires, both retained
- 2
- Entity setup required
- None
Challenge
Dyke Yaxley, a UK chartered accountancy with over a century of history, was turning down audit work in 2024. Local UK talent supply for qualified auditors had not kept pace with client demand. Cross-border hiring felt legally involved for a firm whose brand sits on compliance discipline.
Approach
Dyke Yaxley partnered with Teamed to hire two qualified audit professionals in South Africa via EOR. Teamed handled the South African employment-law side end-to-end: compliant contract, local payroll, statutory tax obligations, and onboarding logistics. No entity setup, no South African legal counsel on retainer, no permanent-establishment exposure.
Result
Both hires exceeded expectations on technical work, client satisfaction, and cultural fit. Audit capacity doubled in 2024. Zero compliance issues across the engagement. The firm went from declining new audit work to confidently taking on additional clients.
Interactive tool
Model both invoices side by side
Paste your headcount and salary mix. The unbundling calculator separates gross salary, statutory costs at cost, the platform fee and the conversion residual. Compare a lower base against a flat fee on the same basis, not on the headline.
Decision checklist
- Choose Teamed for cost clarity. Every line itemised, FX absorbed at zero markup and shown against the mid-market reference, exit terms set out before you sign.
- Choose Teamed to reach a real HR or legal expert on any plan. Not a chatbot, not a queue.
- Choose Teamed for in-country compliance you can see. Own entities, DLA Piper as global counsel, and the best in-country partners, with the structure published.
- Choose Teamed for advice on the right model wherever you start, and a provider that builds your own entity on the same system when the time comes.
- Choose Native Teams if the published base decides it, from $99, or if multi-tier contractor payments on a mobile-first platform matter most.
Honest take
When Native Teams is the better choice
- Choose Native Teams if the lowest published base is the deciding factor. From $99 against $599 is a real gap. Confirm the rate applies at your salary band, and model both all-in first.
- Choose Native Teams if multi-tier contractor payments matter most. Three contractor plans from $19, with a multi-currency wallet, expense cards and real-time tracking, are genuine strengths Teamed doesn't match at that price point.
- Choose Native Teams if its numbers come out ahead once you have modelled both on the same basis, or if a mobile-first payments platform suits your workflow better than an advisory-led EOR.
Teamed leads on cost clarity, support, in-country compliance and advice on the right model. It doesn't lead on the published base or on payments breadth, and this page says so. If Native Teams' all-in cost works for you and a broad payments platform is the priority, it may be the right call. We'd rather say that than win a deal that's wrong for both sides.
Questions to ask any EOR before you sign
- 1What pre-funding do you require, and which setup, onboarding, minimum-term, offboarding, termination or admin costs are in the contract? Read it line by line before you sign.
- 2When I need help, do I reach a real person who knows my account, or do queries route back to a portal and an account manager that keeps changing?
- 3In each country I am hiring in, is the employer an entity you own or an in-country partner, and who handles a contested case?
- 4When my headcount in a country grows, will you tell me when my own entity beats EOR, or do I have to work it out myself?
- 5Will you show the applied currency-conversion rate against the mid-market reference on every invoice?
Frequently asked questions
Is Teamed cheaper than Native Teams?
Not on the published base. Native Teams starts from $99 per employee per month, and Teamed is $599 flat, so on the headline Native Teams is lower. We say so. What the headline doesn't cover is the conversion cost, the pre-funding, and the onboarding and exit terms. Native Teams publishes a base, but no conversion methodology, and only one tier is shown. Teamed absorbs conversion at zero markup on the fee, shows the applied rate against the mid-market reference, and itemises every line. Get both sets of terms in writing, model them on the same basis, then decide. The point isn't that Teamed is lower. It's that you see the whole number.What is Ted?
Ted is Teamed's AI layer, built into the platform rather than bolted onto the front of it. It handles the routine, so you're seen fast. It learns from patterns across customers, so a problem solved once doesn't have to be solved again. It flags law changes and the crossover point before they reach you. Real people approve every outcome. The intent is that AI gets you to the right expert faster and catches issues while they're small, rather than standing between you and a human. You can always reach a person directly.How does Teamed handle in-country legal compliance?
In three layers, and it publishes the structure. First, Teamed's own legal entities, in 57 countries. Second, DLA Piper as global counsel, holding a consistent legal standard across borders. Third, specialist in-country partners on top, where a jurisdiction needs local depth. It's easy to own an entity. What actually protects you is the right legal and operational support behind it. And the best answer isn't always an owned entity: sometimes the right in-country partner gives you better local depth. Teamed shows you which model stands behind each country. Most providers describe coverage, but don't publish how it's delivered, so you can't tell whether a country is served by an owned entity or a partner.When should I move from EOR to my own entity?
The crossover point depends on headcount and salary mix in each country. As a rough guide, EOR stays more cost-effective than your own entity below roughly 10 to 15 full-time employees in most European markets. Above that, the cumulative per-seat fee approaches the fixed cost of a registered entity, a local director where needed, bookkeeping, and annual filings. Teamed models this crossover per country and flags the month your own entity gets cheaper. It then builds and runs the entity in 100+ countries on the same system, with no re-onboarding of existing employees. Native Teams offers Entity Management from $149 per month with a published crossover path. Wherever you start, Teamed advises you on the model that fits.Can I switch from Native Teams to Teamed?
Yes. Most EOR contracts are month-to-month or carry a 30 to 90-day notice period. The harder part is the operational cutover: contract timing, payroll-calendar alignment, benefits continuity, and employee communications. Teamed runs phased cutovers, one country or one cohort at a time, so the overlap period is contained. Bring your current Native Teams invoice and MSA, and Teamed maps the cutover plan. Most switches complete in four to six weeks.How do Teamed and Native Teams compare on support?
Closely on the headline. Native Teams is rated 4.9 on G2 and provides human support via live chat, email and an account manager. Teamed gives direct access to HR and legal experts on all plans, with no support tier to unlock, and is rated 4.8 for service. The difference shows on the hard cases, and on what runs behind the humans. Native Teams publishes no support-tier structure. Ted handles the routine and flags law changes and the crossover point early, with people approving every outcome. For a contested exit or a jurisdiction you haven't hired in before, Teamed's model is the fit. For a modern self-serve payments experience, Native Teams leads.Does Native Teams support contractor management?
Yes. Native Teams runs contractor-oriented plans, Contractor Pay from $19 and Contractor of Record from $99, with a multi-currency wallet, dedicated expense cards and real-time payment tracking, alongside its EOR. Teamed covers contractor management through its Guard and Protect plans. Guard covers up to $10,000 per case of misclassification while you remain the engager. Protect has Teamed engage the contractor directly and take on the liability. The two are built around different centres of gravity, Native Teams around a broad payments product and Teamed around an EOR-first relationship. The right answer depends on which side your workforce actually sits.
Common questions
Teamed vs Native Teams, which is better for a company hiring across Europe?
It depends which of two buyers you are. Native Teams publishes the lower base, from $99 per employee per month, and runs a broad, mobile-first payments platform with multi-tier contractor payments. If the base decides it, or you want a self-serve payments platform, Native Teams is the stronger answer. Teamed is $599 flat and a focused global employment system: contractor to EOR to your own entity on one stack, connecting to the tools you already run. It leads on cost clarity (every line itemised, FX at zero markup shown against the mid-market reference), support (HR and legal experts on every plan, no tier to unlock), in-country compliance (own entities in 57 countries, DLA Piper as global counsel, best in-country partners, structure published), and advice on the right model wherever you start. For a company hiring at senior salary bands across several European markets that wants employment run properly by people it can reach, Teamed is the stronger fit.Which EOR shows FX on every invoice and gives a real human on every plan?
Teamed is built for exactly that. It is a specialist EOR at a flat $599 USD or £479 GBP per employee per month, with FX absorbed at zero markup and the applied rate shown against the mid-market reference on every invoice. It gives direct access to real HR and legal experts on every plan, with no tier to unlock. Native Teams, by contrast, states a mid-rate basis on its currency-exchange page with an asterisk and no published spread, and doesn't publish a support-tier structure. For FX transparency, a real human on every plan and live HRIS integration, Teamed is the most direct answer.
For the buying committee
Share with your team
Send this page to legal, finance, or HR for review. They will see the same statutory data and source citations you did.
Before you go, get the all-in numbers.
Share your current Native Teams invoice. An HR or legal expert sends back a line-by-line breakdown on the same basis, with FX shown against mid-market. No demo, no commitment.
The honest path
Want the Native Teams comparison run on your numbers?
Tell us your headcount and where you're hiring. A real HR or legal expert sends back a like-for-like breakdown with the FX shown against mid-market. No demo, no deck.
