What is the difference between an EOR and setting up an entity via a law firm?

An EOR legally employs your people, runs payroll and carries the local-employer obligations in weeks, with no entity. A law firm entity setup incorporates a legal entity and hands it over; you then become the direct employer and need separate payroll and HR support. An EOR is faster and carries the obligations; the entity gives you direct legal control but requires more setup and ongoing admin.

Which has a lower total cost: EOR or law firm entity setup?

It depends on headcount. EOR has no setup cost and charges a per-employee monthly fee. Law firm entity setup costs professional fees plus registration charges upfront, then ongoing accounting, payroll and filing costs. At low headcount, EOR is usually lower in total. As permanent headcount grows, the entity can win on unit economics. Model the crossover per country.

How long does each option take before I can hire?

An EOR hires in weeks because the entity already exists. Law firm entity setup typically takes months before you can pay anyone. If speed matters, EOR is the only route that gets there in time. You can move to your own entity later.

What happens after the law firm sets up the entity?

The law firm hands over the registered entity and the engagement typically ends. You then need separate payroll, accountants and HR support to run ongoing employment operations. A managed entity provider like Teamed GEMO keeps running those operations after setup, which a law firm generally does not.

Can I move from an EOR to my own entity later?

Yes. EOR is a stage, not the destination. Teamed models the crossover per country and flags when your own entity wins. GEMO then builds and runs it in 90+ countries on the same system, migrating people with no re-onboarding. Because Teamed earns either way, the advice is not tied to keeping you on EOR.

Does Teamed do entity setup as well as EOR?

Yes. GEMO builds and runs entities in 90+ countries. Unlike a law firm that sets up the entity and hands it over, GEMO keeps running payroll, filings and HR operations on the same system, so employees migrate with no re-onboarding and no gap in operational support.

EOR vs Law firm entity setup

EOR vs law firm entity setup, an honest guide to employing in a new country

For small or uncertain headcount, an EOR wins on speed and upfront cost: a provider legally employs your people, runs payroll and carries the local-employer obligations in weeks, with no entity to incorporate. For a large, stable, permanent team needing direct legal ownership and full control of contracts, IP and data, law firm entity setup is the right route. Headcount, permanence and the degree of control you need decide it.

Talk to an entity setup expert Model your crossover point

Two routes, one decision

Weeks
An EOR puts compliant employment in place in weeks. Law firm entity setup typically takes months before you can pay anyone.: 90+
When entity setup is right, Global Entity & Employment Operations (GEMO) builds and runs your entity in 90+ countries on the same system you already use.: 4.8
Rated 4.8 on G2 for service. A real HR or legal expert on every plan, no AI bot wall for the situations that need a human.

Last reviewed 27 June 2026By Tom Price-Daniel, Co-founder, Teamed

EOR vs law firm entity setup, which route gives you compliant employment in a new country faster and at lower upfront cost?

At a glance

EOR

Best for: testing a market, hiring a small number of people quickly, or needing compliant employment before you know whether a permanent registered presence is justified. The EOR carries the local-employer obligations while you direct the work, with no entity, no law firm fees and no ongoing entity admin.

Law firm entity setup

Best for: a large, stable, permanent headcount in one country where you need direct legal ownership, full control of employment terms, bespoke IP assignment and data residency, and where the economics of your own entity are clearly better than the cumulative per-employee EOR cost.

Shared by both: compliant employment in the target country · local payroll and statutory contributions · the right structure can change as you scale

Where it matters	Who leads	Why
Time to first compliant hire	EOR	An EOR puts a compliant hire on the ground in weeks because the employing entity already exists. Law firm entity setup typically takes months: incorporation, tax registration, payroll registration and local banking must complete before you can pay anyone.
Upfront cost	EOR	An EOR has no setup or incorporation fees. Law firm entity setup involves professional fees for advice and filing plus government registration charges, both paid before a single employee is on payroll.
Who carries the local-employer obligations	EOR	Under an EOR the provider is the legal employer and carries local payroll, statutory filings and termination obligations. With law firm entity setup, those obligations sit with you in full from the first employee.
Control of contracts, IP and data	Law firm entity setup	Your own legal entity gives you direct control over bespoke employment terms, IP assignment clauses and where employee and payroll data sits. An EOR delivers compliant contracts within the provider framework, configurable but not fully bespoke.
Ongoing entity admin	EOR	An EOR absorbs payroll, statutory filings and compliance updates. Your own entity means retaining accountants, a local payroll provider and, in some jurisdictions, a resident director, in addition to any law firm fees for ongoing corporate maintenance.
Economics at large, stable headcount	Law firm entity setup	Once permanent headcount in a single country is large, the cumulative per-employee EOR fee passes the largely fixed cost of running your own entity. Past that crossover, direct ownership is the better unit economics.
Exit and reversibility	EOR	Ending an EOR engagement is mostly a notice period and a managed cutover. Winding down a registered entity is a formal deregistration with final filings, account closures and, where employees are involved, a transfer or termination process.
Permanence and market signal	Law firm entity setup	A registered entity signals a long-term commitment to the market, supports local banking, a registered office and a permanent footprint. An EOR is a temporary-to-medium-term structure, not a signal of permanence.

EOR on G2

Who EOR is for

This guide is for fast-growing companies with an international footprint who are weighing how to establish compliant employment in a new country: through an EOR or by setting up a legal entity via a law firm. If you want an honest decision framework rather than a one-sided pitch, this is for you.

Not the right fit if

Already have an entity and need payroll?. If the entity is already set up, what you need is a local payroll provider and HR support rather than an EOR or an entity project. Teamed runs payroll and employment operations for your own entity via GEMO in 90+ countries.

Find your pick in 20 seconds

If you are…	Start with	Why
Testing a new market or hiring fewer than five people in a country	EOR	Compliant hire in weeks, no entity, the obligations carried for you. Revisit when headcount grows.
Large, stable permanent headcount in one country	Own entity via law firm or managed provider	Past the crossover, the fixed entity cost beats the cumulative per-seat EOR fee, with full control of contracts, IP and data.
Growing across several countries, not sure where the line is	EOR now, model the crossover per country	Stay on EOR while headcount is small, and flip the countries where entity economics take over.
Need entity setup and ongoing employment operations from one partner	Teamed GEMO	GEMO builds and runs the entity in 90+ countries on the same system. A law firm hands you the keys; GEMO keeps running it.

What is EOR vs law firm entity setup?

An Employer of Record (EOR) and a law firm entity setup are two distinct routes to compliant employment in a country where you have no existing legal presence. The EOR route skips entity setup entirely. An Employer of Record legally employs your people in that country through its own entity or a vetted local partner, issues the employment contract, runs payroll, remits tax and statutory contributions, and carries the local-employer obligations while you direct the day-to-day work. There is no incorporation timeline, no resident director to appoint and no accounting firm to retain separately. The cost is a per-employee monthly fee, and compliant employment typically starts within weeks.

The law firm route is the direct ownership path. A firm with local practice advises on the right entity type for the jurisdiction, drafts and files the incorporation documents, and guides you through tax and payroll registration. Once registered, you are the direct employer and carry every obligation: compliant employment contracts, payroll, statutory filings and, where the law requires it, a resident director. Law firm professional fees and government registration charges are paid upfront. Once the entity is handed over, you still need a payroll provider, accountants and HR support, because a law firm sets up the entity but does not run the ongoing employment operations. The choice between the two turns on headcount, permanence and how much direct legal control you need in that country.

Speed and setup, how quickly can you start hiring?

The most common reason companies choose EOR over law firm entity setup is speed. When an EOR employs your hire, the entity already exists in that country, payroll and statutory registrations are in place, and onboarding can start within weeks of signing. Setting up a legal entity via a law firm means drafting and filing incorporation documents, registering for tax and payroll, opening local banking and, in many jurisdictions, appointing a resident director before you can pay a single employee. That process typically runs to months. If you need someone working soon, the EOR is the only route that gets there.

Detail	EOR	Law firm entity setup
Time to first compliant hire	Weeks. The employing entity already exists, so onboarding starts almost immediately once the engagement is signed.	Months. Incorporation, tax registration, payroll registration, local banking and, where required, a resident director must complete before payroll can run.
Setup work you do	Sign the EOR agreement and provide the hire details. The provider handles the in-country mechanics.	Instruct a law firm, provide company information, sign incorporation documents, open local banking, complete registrations.
Good fit when	You need someone on the ground within weeks, or you are still validating whether the market justifies a permanent presence.	You can plan months ahead, have confirmed large permanent headcount, and want a registered legal presence in that jurisdiction.

A practical read

If you have found the person and want them working next month, an EOR is the only option that gets there. You can always set up your own entity later, once headcount and certainty justify the investment in law firm fees and ongoing entity administration.

Cost structure, what you pay upfront and ongoing

The two models have opposite cost shapes. An EOR charges a per-employee monthly fee with no upfront setup cost. Law firm entity setup requires professional fees for legal advice and filing plus government registration charges, both paid before you can employ anyone. After that, the entity carries an ongoing cost of local accounting, annual filings and payroll administration. At low headcount, the per-seat EOR fee is usually lower than the sum of those entity costs. As permanent headcount in one country grows, the cumulative per-seat fee climbs toward the largely fixed entity cost. The crossing point is the crossover, and it is country-specific.

Detail	EOR	Law firm entity setup
Upfront cost	None. No setup fees, no incorporation fees. The first cost is the monthly per-employee fee once the hire is in place.	Law firm professional fees plus government registration charges. These vary significantly by jurisdiction and entity type.
Ongoing cost shape	Per-employee monthly fee, scales with headcount in the country.	Largely fixed: local accounting, payroll administration, annual filings and, where required, a resident director.
Better unit economics at	Low headcount. A handful of employees costs less on a per-seat EOR fee than the fixed cost of running an entity.	High, stable headcount. Past the crossover, the fixed entity cost is spread across many employees and beats the cumulative per-seat fee.

Model it per country

The crossover headcount varies widely by jurisdiction, so a rule of thumb will mislead you. Teamed models the crossover per country against your real salary mix and local entity costs. The crossover calculator gives a first read in a couple of minutes.

Open the crossover calculator

Risk and obligations, who is the legal employer?

Under an EOR, the provider is the legal employer in-country and carries the obligations of that role: compliant contracts, payroll, statutory contributions and terminations within local law. You direct the work; the provider holds the local-employer exposure. Once a law firm sets up your entity, those obligations transfer entirely to you from the first employee: employment law compliance, payroll accuracy, statutory filings and any director duties the jurisdiction imposes. Neither model removes local employment law. The difference is who holds it day to day. The exact allocation under any EOR sits in the Master Services Agreement. This is not legal advice.

Detail	EOR	Law firm entity setup
Legal employer	The EOR provider is the legal employer in-country and carries the local-employer obligations.	Your own entity is the direct employer. You carry every employer obligation from the first hire.
Payroll and statutory filings	Handled by the EOR provider within local law, including statutory contributions and the termination process.	You run compliance in-house or with retained local accountants and a payroll provider.
Ongoing employment-law expertise	The EOR coordinates involved cases with real HR and legal experts and local counsel.	You manage employment-law matters directly, or with external local counsel you retain separately.

The honest limit

No EOR removes local employment law, and no entity makes it simpler. An EOR moves where the obligation sits and provides the expertise to handle it. With your own entity, you need to retain that expertise separately, through a local HR team, accountants and, where required, external employment counsel. This is not legal advice.

Control, contracts, IP and data residency

This is where your own entity earns its keep. As the direct employer you design bespoke employment terms, control IP assignment clauses to your home company, choose your equity scheme structure and decide where employee and payroll data resides. Under an EOR you get compliant local contracts and standard benefits within the provider's framework rather than fully bespoke to your business. For most companies at small headcount in a new country, that framework is an advantage: less to build, lower exposure, faster to operate. For a large permanent team with involved IP arrangements or strict data-residency requirements, the control of your own entity becomes worth the overhead.

Detail	EOR	Law firm entity setup
Employment contracts	Compliant local contracts issued by the EOR provider, within its framework. Configurable but not fully bespoke.	Fully bespoke employment terms you design, own and can update at will.
IP assignment	Handled per country with legal support through the provider structure. Not a direct assignment to your home entity.	Direct assignment to your own entity, structured as your legal team specifies.
Data residency	Data sits within the EOR provider environment, with configurable residency options.	Full control of where employee and payroll data resides, on your own infrastructure or preferred provider.

Control follows scale

A handful of hires rarely need bespoke contracts or strict in-house data residency. A large, permanent local team often does, which is one reason the control argument and the entity crossover economics tend to point the same way.

Exit and reversibility, how easily can you change course?

Optionality matters when you are testing a new market. Leaving an EOR engagement is mostly a notice period and a managed cutover, so the cost of getting the market wrong is limited. Winding down a registered entity is a different undertaking: formal deregistration with final tax filings, closing local banking and payroll accounts, and, where employees are still in place, a transfer or termination process. It takes time, generates cost and ties up management attention. Match the model to how certain you are about the market. When certainty is low, EOR keeps optionality at a low cost.

Detail	EOR	Law firm entity setup
Ending the arrangement	Notice period and a managed cutover. Most EOR contracts run on 30 to 90-day notice.	Formal entity deregistration: final filings, account closures, employee transfers or terminations.
Cost of exit	Predictable: the notice-period fee and any offboarding costs set out in the contract.	Variable: deregistration filing fees, accountant time, potential employee severance and, in some jurisdictions, external legal counsel.
Reversibility	High. You can scale up, scale down or exit with relatively short notice.	Low. Setting up and winding down are both deliberate, time-consuming projects.

Keep optionality while it is low-cost

If you are unsure a market will last or headcount will grow, EOR keeps the exit cost low. You can commit to your own entity once headcount, permanence and certainty are all in place.

Why the comparison matters

Behind every line item is a real person, in a real place.

The fee, the FX and the support model are not abstractions. They decide whether the person you hired in Barcelona or Rome is paid right, on time, by someone who knows their employment law. That is the comparison worth running.

What each stakeholder evaluates

Criterion	Legal	Finance	People Ops	Security
Speed and headcount certainty	An EOR can establish compliant employment in weeks without an entity. If headcount is uncertain or the market is being tested, EOR limits your wind-down exposure compared to incorporating an entity.	Law firm entity setup involves professional fees upfront plus ongoing entity costs. At low headcount, the per-seat EOR fee is usually lower in total. Model the crossover per country before committing to incorporation.	EOR gets people working fast, with compliant contracts and benefits in place from day one. Your own entity is worth the wait only when you are committed to a permanent, large local team.	Under an EOR, employee and payroll data sits in the provider environment with configurable residency. Your own entity gives full control of where data resides.
Control and bespoke legal structure	Direct control of employment terms, IP assignment and data residency requires your own entity. An EOR provides compliant standard contracts within the provider framework, configurable but not fully bespoke.	Bespoke IP and data structures add cost whether via a law firm or an entity management provider. Weigh whether the legal specificity your team needs actually applies at your current headcount in that country.	Bespoke benefits design and equity scheme integration are more straightforward with your own entity. On EOR, these are handled within the provider framework, which covers most standard needs at small to mid headcount.	Strict data-residency requirements, where employee data must stay within the country or on your own infrastructure, are more straightforward to enforce via your own entity than through an EOR provider environment.
Ongoing operations after entity setup	A law firm sets up the entity but does not run ongoing employment operations. Once the entity is handed over, you need a payroll provider, accountants and HR support. Confirm who provides those before you sign.	The total cost of law firm entity setup is not just the incorporation fee. Add the ongoing cost of a local payroll provider, accountants and any retained HR or legal support. Compare the all-in number to the per-seat EOR fee at your headcount.	Through a managed entity provider such as GEMO, employees stay on their contracts and history during a transition from EOR. A law firm entity setup followed by separate payroll and HR partners means more handoffs and greater re-onboarding overhead.	Each additional vendor in the employment stack is a data-handling party. A law firm sets up the entity; a payroll provider holds wage data; an HR system holds employment records. An EOR or managed entity provider handles the full stack under one contract.

How to decide between EOR and law firm entity setup

The decision is a sequence, not a coin toss. Work through headcount, speed and control in order and the right structure for each country usually emerges from the facts.

Step 1
Confirm headcount and permanence
Decide how many people you plan to employ in this country and how permanent that headcount is. A handful of people in a market you are testing points toward EOR. A large, stable, permanent team points toward your own entity.
Step 2
Get the full cost of law firm entity setup
Ask the law firm for the total: professional fees for advice and filing, government registration charges and an estimate of the ongoing cost of accountants, payroll and any required resident director. That is the real cost to compare against the per-seat EOR fee at your headcount.
Step 3
Model the crossover
At what headcount does the cumulative per-seat EOR fee pass the fixed cost of your own entity? That is your crossover. Below it, EOR is usually the better structure. Above it, your own entity tends to win. Model it per country, not as a rule of thumb across your footprint.
Step 4
Ask who runs operations after setup
A law firm hands you the keys to an entity and you find your own payroll and HR. An EOR or a managed entity provider keeps running operations. Ask whether you want a single partner for setup and ongoing operations, or separate specialists.

Dyke Yaxley · UK chartered accountancy

100% audit capacity added. Zero entity setup or law firm fees.

Audit capacity added in 2024: +100%
Compliance issues across the engagement: 0
Employees hired via EOR, both retained: 2
Entity setup or law firm fees required: None

Challenge

Dyke Yaxley, a UK chartered accountancy with over a century of history, was turning down audit work in 2024. Local talent supply for qualified auditors had not kept pace with demand. Setting up a South African entity via a law firm for two hires made no economic sense: professional fees, registration costs and ongoing accounting would far outpace the per-employee EOR cost at that headcount.

Approach

Dyke Yaxley partnered with Teamed to hire two qualified audit professionals in South Africa via EOR. Teamed handled the South African employment side end-to-end: a compliant local contract, local payroll, statutory tax obligations and onboarding. No South African entity, no law firm fees, no ongoing entity admin and no local counsel on retainer.

Result

Both hires exceeded expectations on technical work, client satisfaction and cultural fit. Audit capacity doubled in 2024, with zero compliance issues across the engagement. EOR was clearly the right structure at this headcount, and the firm kept the option to revisit if the team in South Africa grows.

Read the full case study →

Interactive tool

Compare EOR cost vs entity setup cost at your headcount

Enter your headcount and salary mix in the target country. The crossover calculator shows where the cumulative per-seat EOR fee passes the fixed cost of running your own entity, so you can see whether EOR or entity setup is the right structure today.

Open the crossover calculator

Decision checklist

Use an EOR when you need compliant employment in weeks, have a small or uncertain headcount in the country, and want the provider to carry the local-employer obligations while you direct the work.
Use law firm entity setup when you have a large, stable, permanent headcount in one country, need full control of bespoke contracts, IP assignment and data residency, and the cumulative EOR cost has passed the fixed cost of your own entity.
Get the full cost of law firm entity setup before comparing. Add professional fees, government registration charges and the ongoing cost of accountants, payroll and any required resident director, not just the incorporation fee.
Ask who runs ongoing operations after the entity is set up. A law firm hands over the keys; a managed entity provider keeps running payroll, filings and HR operations for you.
Decide per country, not across your whole footprint. The same company can rightly run EOR in a market it is testing and its own entity in a country where headcount is large and permanent.

Email this to legal

Honest take

When law firm entity setup is the better choice

Choose law firm entity setup when you have a large, stable, permanent headcount in one country and the cumulative per-employee EOR fee has clearly passed the fixed cost of incorporation, accounting, payroll and annual filings.
Choose law firm entity setup when you need fully bespoke employment contracts, direct IP assignment to your home entity, or strict data-residency controls that a provider framework cannot deliver.
Choose law firm entity setup when a permanent registered presence in the market matters for your brand, local banking, a registered office or a long-term commitment to the country.

EOR is a stage, not the destination. When your own entity is genuinely the better structure, Teamed can still be the partner that builds and runs it for you via GEMO in 90+ countries, keeping employees on their contracts and history with no re-onboarding. A path off EOR, not just onto it.

Questions to ask any EOR before you sign

1How many people do you plan to employ in this country, and is that headcount permanent?
2How quickly do you need someone on the ground: weeks or months?
3What are the law firm professional fees plus government registration charges for this specific entity type and jurisdiction?
4Once the entity is set up, who will run payroll, statutory filings and HR operations, and at what ongoing cost?
5At what headcount does the cumulative per-seat EOR fee pass the fixed cost of the entity?
6Do you need bespoke IP assignment or data residency that a provider framework cannot deliver?
7If you start on EOR, which provider will tell you proactively when your own entity becomes the better structure?
8Can the entity setup provider also run the ongoing employment operations, or does entity handover leave you to find payroll and HR separately?
9What are the exit terms each way: EOR notice period versus winding down a registered entity?

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between an EOR and setting up an entity via a law firm?
An Employer of Record legally employs your people in the country through its own entity or a vetted local partner. It issues the contract, runs payroll, remits tax and statutory contributions, and carries the local-employer obligations while you direct the work, all in weeks and with no entity to incorporate. A law firm entity setup means engaging a firm with local practice to incorporate a legal entity in that country. Once it exists, you are the direct employer and carry every obligation: contracts, payroll, annual filings and, where required, a resident director. The law firm sets up the entity but does not run the ongoing employment operations, so you then need a payroll provider, accountants and HR support separately.
Which has a lower total cost: EOR or law firm entity setup?
It depends on headcount. An EOR has no upfront setup cost and charges a per-employee monthly fee. Law firm entity setup involves upfront professional fees for advice and filing plus government registration charges, followed by ongoing local accounting, payroll and annual filing costs. At low headcount, the per-seat EOR fee is usually lower in total than the fixed cost of the entity. As permanent headcount in one country grows, the cumulative per-seat fee can pass the fixed entity cost. The crossover point is country-specific, so it should be modelled per country against your actual salary mix and local entity costs rather than estimated with a rule of thumb.
How long does each option take before I can hire?
An EOR can put a compliant hire on the ground in weeks because the employing entity already exists. Setting up an entity via a law firm typically takes months: incorporation documents, tax and payroll registration, local banking and, where required, a resident director must all complete before you can pay your first employee. If you need someone working soon, an EOR is the only route that gets there in time. You can always move to your own entity later once headcount and certainty justify the investment.
What happens after the law firm sets up the entity?
The law firm hands over the registered entity: you receive the incorporation documents, tax registrations and, where applicable, a resident director appointment. You are then the direct employer and need to set up payroll, retain local accountants for annual filings, and put HR processes in place. A law firm is typically not in the business of running ongoing employment operations. This is the main practical difference from an EOR or a managed entity provider, which continues to run payroll, filings and HR after setup.
Can I move from an EOR to my own entity later?
Yes, and a good EOR provider helps you do it. EOR is a stage, not the destination. Teamed models the crossover per country and flags when your own entity becomes the better structure. When that point arrives, Global Entity & Employment Operations (GEMO) builds and runs your own entity in 90+ countries on the same system, migrating employees with no re-onboarding. Because Teamed earns whether you stay on EOR or move to a managed entity, the advice is not tied to keeping you on EOR, which is unusual in the category.
Does Teamed do entity setup as well as EOR?
Yes. Global Entity & Employment Operations (GEMO) is Teamed's entity build-and-run service. When your own entity becomes the better structure, GEMO incorporates and registers it in 90+ countries and then continues to run payroll, filings and HR operations on the same system you already use. Employees migrate with no re-onboarding. GEMO differs from a law firm entity setup in that it does not hand over the entity and leave: it keeps running the employment operations, so there is no gap between entity incorporation and having someone run the employment side.

Common questions

Should we use an EOR or set up our own entity via a law firm to hire in a new country?
It depends on headcount, speed and how committed you are to the market. Use an EOR when you need compliant employment in weeks, have a small or uncertain headcount in the country, and want someone else to carry the local-employer obligations. EOR is faster, has no setup cost and is easy to exit if the market does not pan out. Set up your own entity via a law firm or a managed entity provider when you have a large, stable, permanent headcount in one country, need full control of bespoke contracts, IP assignment and data residency, and the cumulative per-seat EOR fee has passed the fixed cost of your own entity. Get the full cost of entity setup before comparing: professional fees, registration charges and the ongoing cost of accountants, payroll and any required resident director. Ask who runs operations after entity handover, because a law firm sets up the entity but does not run the employment side.
Is there a way to get both entity setup and ongoing employment operations from one provider?
Yes. Teamed's Global Entity & Employment Operations (GEMO) service builds your entity in 90+ countries and then continues to run payroll, filings and HR operations on the same system. This differs from the typical law firm model, where incorporation is the deliverable and employment operations are left to you. GEMO also differs from a standalone EOR in that it gives you direct legal ownership of the entity rather than employing through the provider's entity. The result is that you get the control of your own entity without the operational gap between entity setup and having someone run the employment side.

For the buying committee

Share with your team

Send this page to legal, finance, or HR for review. They will see the same statutory data and source citations you did.

Not sure which route fits your headcount?

Share the country and the headcount. A real HR or legal expert comes back with which structure fits, a crossover read and, if entity setup is right, whether GEMO makes sense. No commitment.

The honest path

Want the Law firm entity setup comparison run on your numbers?

Tell us your headcount and where you're hiring. A real HR or legal expert sends back a like-for-like breakdown with the FX shown against mid-market. No demo, no deck.

Talk to an entity setup expert