--- title: "White-label EOR pricing and revenue share: how partners earn" description: "Three shapes: revenue share, a per-employee rate you mark up, and referral fees. On the pages read, Remote and Deel publish no rate. What Remote and Deel publish, and what Teamed offers." canonical: https://www.teamed.global/insights/white-label-eor-pricing-and-revenue-share datePublished: 2026-10-15T12:00:00.000Z --- **Three shapes exist: revenue share, a per-employee rate you mark up, and referral fees. On the pages read, Remote and Deel publish no rate. Teamed offers revenue share, with zero FX markup.** This page explains each shape. It quotes what Remote and Deel actually publish. And it says plainly what Teamed does and does not publish. This page answers what the deal will cost. It is written for the product or partnerships lead at a platform, and for the finance lead they bring to the second call. It carries no figures for revenue share or per-employee rates, from any provider. None is published, and a number written here would be a guess dressed as a fact. ## How do partners earn? In one of three ways. The shape decides what your customer pays and what you keep. Revenue share is one of the three shapes, and it is Teamed's. No percentage is published. Under a mark-up model, the provider charges the partner a per-employee rate. The partner sets its own price on top. The margin sits between two numbers the end customer never sees, which is where this model's problems start. Under a referral model, the partner introduces the customer. The provider contracts with the customer directly. The partner receives a fee or a share for the introduction, and its own product carries nothing. What a mark-up model does to your price is worth pausing on. Every cost the provider pushes into the rate lands on your side of the line: a conversion spread, a fee for a document, a charge for an exit. You either absorb it or pass it to a customer who cannot see where it came from. ## What do Remote and Deel publish about pricing? The shape, and not the rate. Remote's partner page offers "options like revenue sharing, referral bonuses, discounts for your customers". Its Embedded pages say nothing on money. Deel's embedded page says "Commercials are based on how you package and monetize workforce capabilities for your customers". Its partner page names "revenue-sharing incentives". All the pages were read on 15 October 2026. Neither company publishes a rate or a minimum, and neither publishes an FX markup figure, on the pages read. Remote does publish an FX policy. It is a fixed monthly "Remote FX rate" that "will vary from month to month with transaction volume, the volatility of the currency pair, and conversion cost" (support.remote.com, read 15 October 2026). Deel's pricing page says it "provides competitive exchange rates" with "minimal fees" (deel.com/pricing, read the same day). That is exactly as much as can be said. It is the honest baseline for every conversation you will have with either of them. ## Where does the Hidden Global Employment Tax hide in a partner deal? One layer further from the person paying it. The Hidden Global Employment Tax is everything a company pays for in global employment that is not the thing it actually wanted. In a direct arrangement the customer can at least read the invoice. In a partner arrangement the provider's charges sit inside your product. So a markup or a fee the provider adds is your fee to your customer, whether you set it or not. FX is the line that grows with volume. A conversion spread on every payslip, in every currency, compounds as your customers hire. None of them will ever see it as a line. Teamed's answer to that is the right structure for where you are, honest advice about where you are going, and what it really costs. For a partner, Teamed's policy is zero FX markup. If you want to see what a provider is taking on FX today, the [FX Transparency Calculator](/tools/unbundling-calculator) reads an EOR invoice. It shows the gap between the rate applied and the mid-market rate on the invoice date. ## What should you ask before you sign? Different questions from the ones that choose a model. These are the ones that decide whether the money works. What is the commercial shape: revenue share, a marked-up rate or referral? Is it in writing? Is there a minimum, a deposit, or a volume you have to reach before the share applies? Who contracts with the end customer? Who invoices them, and who collects payment? What is the FX policy on your customers' payroll? Is it a published rate, or a spread inside the conversion? What is the margin, if any, between what the provider charges and what your customer pays, and who takes it? And what happens to pricing, and to your customers' employees, if you leave? Does the provider go to them direct, and on what terms? A provider that answers all of those in writing is telling you what the deal costs. A provider that answers some of them is telling you where the rest is hidden. ## What does Teamed offer partners? Revenue share. No percentage is published. The partnership covers billing, funding, pricing, FX and fees, as well as onboarding, the payroll cycle and visa support. Teamed's FX policy for partners is zero FX markup. Pricing is part of what the partnership covers. ## What does Teamed not publish? A revenue-share percentage. Teamed publishes that it is revenue share, that it charges zero FX markup, and what the partnership covers. Teamed offers white-label EOR: it runs the full employer of record service behind a partner's own platform on revenue share, with zero FX markup. It publishes no revenue-share percentage. The [white-label EOR page](/partners/white-label-eor) sets out what the partnership includes.